Selfcoelum brasilianum Stossich, 1902
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4053.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5D898449-E50A-4F70-B82B-BF2281A95F12 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6108933 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/317187CD-FFFE-7701-BEB0-A7EC9DC989A9 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Selfcoelum brasilianum |
status |
comb. nov. |
S. brasilianum ( Stossich, 1902) n. comb.
Type host. Lesser yellowlegs, Tringa flaviceps (Gmelin) (Syn. Scolopax flaviceps Gmelin ) ( Charadriiformes : Scolopacidae ).
Type location. Specimens at the Berlin Museum collected from Brazil.
Additional hosts. NHMUK on-line Host-Parasite Database lists 17 avian host species under Cyclocoelum brasilianum Stossich, 1902 (see below).
Additional localities. NHMUK on-line Host-Parasite Database lists 5 localities and 19 references under Cyclocoelum brasilianum Stossich, 1902 (see below).
Previously proposed synonyms. Haematotrephus phaneropsolus Stossich, 1902 — Bashkirova (1950); Cyclocoelum halli Harrah, 1922 (= Harrahium halli [ Harrah, 1922]), Cyclocoelum nittanyense Zeliff, 1946 (= Haematotrephus nittanyense [ Zeliff, 1946])— Dubois (1959); Cyclocoelum halli (= Harrahium halli ), Corpopyrum brasilianum ( Stossich, 1902) — Joyeux & Baer (1927).
Remarks. In the original description of Cyclocoelum brasilianum Stossich, 1902 , only a body length and width were provided, but Stossich noted that “in Berlin, the jar bearing the label 2494 Monostomum mutabile Zeder , contained 4 specimens collected by Olfersin from the thorax and abdomen of Scolopax flaviceps (Ypanema in Brazil)”. Kossack (1911) redescribed this species based on what appears to be the same four specimens mentioned by Stossich (1902) housed in the Berlin Museum (No. 2494) that were apparently collected from Tringa flaviceps (Syn. Scolopax flaviceps ) from Ypanema, Brazil, and a specimen in the Wiener collection (No. 522) labelled as M. mutabile , which was collected from T. flaviceps also from Brazil. These specimens have a pretesticular ovary that forms a triangle with the testes (Haematotrephinae) ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 5 – 9 of Kossack 1911). Apparently, based on Kossack’s interpretation of C. brasilianum, Bashkirova (1950) moved this species to Haematotrephus . Later Kanev et al. (2002a) established Neohaematotrephus where the pretesticular ovary forms a triangle with the testes and the genital pore is prepharyngeal, with Neohaematotrephus brasilianum ( Stossich, 1902) as the type species. These authors apparently based this placement on the interpretations of this species by Kossack (1911) and later Bashkirova (1950); however, it is noteworthy that Kanev et al. (2002a) considered N. brasilianum to have the vitelline fields confluent posteriorly (Fig. 20.14), while Kossack (1911) and Bashkirova (1950) considered them not to be confluent. As originally described and illustrated by Stossich (1902), C. brasilianum (= Selfcoelum brasilianum n. comb.) has an intertesticular ovary that forms a triangle with the testes (Cyclocoelinae), a postpharyngeal genital pore and vitelline fields that are not confluent posterior, placing it in Selfcoelum , and in our opinion it is unlikely that the specimens noted by Stossich (1902) and later examined by Kossack (1911) represent this species ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 5 – 9 of Kossack 1911). Further, Bashkirova’s Fig.150 of Haematotrephus brasilianum and Fig. 20.14 View FIGURES 19 – 22 of N. brasilianum ( Kanev et al. 2002a; ovary pretesticular, genital pore prepharyngeal) do not appear to represent the same genus as the specimens originally described by Stossich (1902) ( Figs. 7 and 8 View FIGURES 5 – 9 of Stossich 1902). Yamaguti (1958) transferred this species to Corpopyrum; however, Corpopyrum has been synonymized with Haematotrephus ( Kanev et al. 2002a). No oral or ventral sucker described—Stossich (1902).
NHMUK |
Natural History Museum, London |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |