Pseudanurophorus arctica, Cassagnau, 1959
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4592.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B6FF005C-D0AA-4532-8ACC-43D3DED984EF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5073891 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/266B5D55-F77D-FFEF-FF7E-FE43450CFC5C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pseudanurophorus arctica |
status |
|
– Tetracanthella arctica Cassagnau, 1959: 234
AK Bohnsack 1968; Challet & Bohnsack 1968; MacLean et al. 1977, 1978, cf.; Christiansen & Bellinger 1980, 1998; Danks 1981; Toda & Tanno 1983; Skidmore 1995
NT Toda & Tanno 1983; Skidmore 1995
NU Cassagnau 1959; Fjellberg 1986, 1994; Potapov 2001; Babenko & Fjellberg 2006
NS Christiansen & Bellinger 1980, 1998; Skidmore 1995
Remarks: The majority of the above Nearctic records probably belong to T. sibirica ( Christiansen & Bellinger 1998; see also remarks to T. sibirica ). Potapov (2001) also wrote “having large amounts at material from the Arctic, we did not find this species [true arctica ] anywhere but from Ellesmere Land”. On the other hand, “the taxon sibirica as defined by Potapov (2001) … is not sharply set off from arctica Cassagnau, 1959 ” ( Fjellberg 2015, p. 64). It is therefore still an open question which of the species ( T. sibirica , T. arctica , or both) occur in the northern Nearctic.
General distribution: uncertain.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pseudanurophorus arctica
Babenko, Anatoly, Stebaeva, Sophya & Turnbull, Matthew S. 2019 |
Tetracanthella arctica
Cassagnau, P. 1959: 234 |