Scotophilus cf. viridis (Peters 1852)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3161/150811010X537963 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4340366 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2431452B-3561-9A3C-FF09-C410A961F855 |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Scotophilus cf. viridis (Peters 1852) |
status |
|
Scotophilus cf. viridis (Peters 1852) View in CoL
Twenty-five individuals were recorded from 10 sites in southern and northern Mozambique, making it the second most widespread species encountered during this study. The species has probably been overlooked in central Mozambique since it has been recorded there in the past ( Smithers and Lobão Tello, 1976). Toward absolving the confusion associated with the status of this taxon, the smallest yellow-bellied species of Scotophilus in Southern Africa were assigned to S. viridis by Monadjem et al. (2010), distinct from the similar sized, but cream-bellied S. leucogaster . The recent paper by Jacobs and Barclay (2009), assigned the name S. ‘ mhlanganii ’ for their studied population of this small, yellow-bellied Scotophilus , but this most unfortunate introduction of a nomen nudum into an already confusing taxonomy has created more problems than it solves ( Monadjem et al., 2010).
Field measurements: FA (adult male) 46.4 ± 1.22 (44.1–48.2, 17); Bm (adult male) 19.2 ± 2.90 (16.0– 24.5, 16); FA (adult female) 47.7 ± 2.06 (45.4–51.7, 8); Bm (adult female) 26.1 ± 7.06 (17.0–33.0, 6).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |