Ommatissus fuscus, Chang, Zhi-Min & Chen, Xiang-Sheng, 2014
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3856.2.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5B8F8EDD-97FD-4D56-BD67-06C394F8653C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6123354 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/21140210-DC60-FFC6-FF66-FA27FB4581F5 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ommatissus fuscus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Ommatissus fuscus sp. nov.
( Figs 1–3 View FIGURES 1 – 12 , 13–23 View FIGURES 13 – 23 )
Description. Body length (from apex of vertex to tip of forewings): male 4.4–4.5 mm (N=6), female 4.6–4.9 mm (N=6).
General colour brown to pitchy, abdomen dark brown. Vertex and pronotum ( Figs 1–2 View FIGURES 1 – 12 ) pale yellow, base of pronotum brown, anterior margin of pronotum with black fasciae; disc of mesonotum yellowish brown, with brown longitudinal stripe on each side of median carina, base of mesoscutellum black brown. Frons ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 12 ) with reverse pyriform dark patch in upper part, postclypeus dark brown, anteclypeus stramineous with pale yellow median callus, genae pale yellow, lorae diffusely dark brownish. Forewings ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 12 ) with brown to black except edges. Tips of spines on hind tibiae and tarsi black.
Vertex ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 13 – 23 ) shorter in middle than widest breadth (1.0:1.8). Frons ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 13 – 23 ) longer in middle than widest breadth (1.5:1.0). Pronotum ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1 – 12 ) broader than long (3.7:1.0). Forewings ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 13 – 23 ) with about seven apical cells. Hind tibia each with 2 distinct lateral spines, spinal formula of hind leg 7–7–2.
Male genitalia. Pygofer ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 13 – 23 ) symmetrical, anterior margin straight and posterior margin arched. Anal tube ( Figs 21–22 View FIGURES 13 – 23 ) short, anal style slightly surpassing anal tube. Gonostyli ( Figs 18–20 View FIGURES 13 – 23 ) bilaterally symmetrical, in lateral view about 1.4 times as long as broad, with a strong hook-like process arising from laterodoral margin, acute tip bent lateroventrad, with triangular process arising from base of dorsal margin, subapical knife-like process pointed to inner side. Aedeagus ( Figs 18, 21–23 View FIGURES 13 – 23 ) elongate and tubular, shaft slender in lateral view; base broad, then becoming narrow, tip nozzle-shaped, with phallotrema apically exposed. Periandrium ( Figs 21–23 View FIGURES 13 – 23 ) surrounding penis at base, dorsally connected with ventrobasal margin of anal tube, ventral projection well developed, in dorsal view bridge-like, with asymmetrical lobate processes, subapically with two hooked process pointed to outer side, ventrally with 2 small teeth.
Type Material. Holotype ♂, Langshan (26°22′N, 110°49′E), Xinning, Hunan, China, 5 Oct. 2010, X.-S. Chen. Paratypes: 3♂♂, 2♀♀, same data as holotype; 2♂♂, 2♀♀, Fenshuiling National Nature Reserve (22°47′N, 103°12′E), Jinping County, Yunnan, China, 7 Aug. 2012, J.-K. Long, W.-B. Zheng; 2♀♀, Xianheping Nature Reserve (25°06′N, 105°27′E), Anlong County, Guizhou, 26 Aug. 2012, J.-K. Long; 1♂, Wangmo County (25°10′N, 106°06′E), Guizhou, 21 Aug. 2012, W.-B. Zheng.
Host plant. Unknown.
Etymology. The specific name is derived from the Latin word “ fuscus ” (fuscous) referring its fuscous forewings except marginal area.
Distribution. China (Hunan, Guizhou, Yunnan).
Remarks. This new species is similar to O. lofouensis Muir , but can be distinguished from the latter by the forewings with brown to black except the edge; frons with reverse pyriform dark patch in the upper part; periandrium with bridge process; and aedeagus straight and tubular, with tip nozzle-shaped.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |