Calochaete cimrmanii Hauer, Bohunická & Mühlsteinová, 2013

Hauer, Tomáš, Bohunická, Markéta & Mühlsteinová, Radka, 2013, Calochaete gen. nov. (Cyanobacteria, Nostocales), a new cyanobacterial type from the “ páramo ” zone in Costa Rica, Phytotaxa 109 (1), pp. 36-44 : 38-40

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.109.1.4

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5078716

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1F7B4A69-FFF7-FF96-51FB-FC4DF738D0A9

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Calochaete cimrmanii Hauer, Bohunická & Mühlsteinová
status

sp. nov.

Calochaete cimrmanii Hauer, Bohunická & Mühlsteinová , sp. nov. ( Figs 1A–P View FIGURE 1 )

The description corresponds to that of the genus.

Type:— COSTA RICA. Chirripó Mountain slope, 9° 29’ 58” N, 83° 30’ 24” W, surface soil in páramo, dried specimen from culture of sample, colle. M. Bohunická and J. Mareš, 6 March 2010 (holotype: CBFS! A–015). Type strain: CCALA 1012 View Materials GoogleMaps .

Habitat: —Surface soil in “páramo” (tropical high montane vegetation).

Etymology:—The species is named after the mythical Czech scientist, dramatist, poet, and writer Jára Cimrman.

Observations:—The life cycle contains several morphologically distinct stages ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). One was described above, i.e long, gradually tapering, heteropolar filaments ( Figs 1A, B, P View FIGURE 1 ). The second consists of hormogonia composed of short, isodiametric, barrel-shaped to spherical cells resembling in morphology Nostoc Vaucher ex Bornet et Flahault (1888: 181) types lacking the sheath ( Fig. 1E View FIGURE 1 ). Some cells within the hormogonia grow in size and change their shape to spherical ( Figs 1D, O View FIGURE 1 ). Cells may sometimes divide in more than one plane ( Figs 1L, M, O View FIGURE 1 ), but never form a true branch. A new filament then germinates from the hormogonia ( Fig. 1C View FIGURE 1 ). The first cell of the filament becomes a heterocyte. The hormogonia with large spherical cells (e.g. Fig. 1D View FIGURE 1 ) occur in young cultures only.

Our strain differs from the morphologically similar genus Calothrix Agardh ex Bornet et Flahault (1886: 345) by the absence of a terminal hair and frequent false single or double branching ( Figs 1G, H, N View FIGURE 1 ). As notable from Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 , the 16S rRNA sequence of Calochaete cimrmanii is very distant from members of Rivulariaceae and is more related to Microchaetaceae . The most similar are sequences of Tolypothix strains UAM 332, 334, 337 and PCC 7504, but the degree of tapering is significantly lower in these strains. The low degree of tapering itself is one of the key diacritical features of the genus Tolypothrix Kützing ex Bornet et Flahault (1887: 118) , which is accepted in both the botanical ( Komárek & Anagnostidis 1989) and bacteriological ( Castenholz 2001) literatures. From the above mentioned Tolypothrix strains, Calochaete cimrmanii differs also by living in a significantly different –non-aquatic, high mountain– habitat.

Comparison of the secondary structures of 16S-23S ITS is of taxonomic importance according to Johansen et al. (2011). To illustrate specificity and the rate of relatedness of the different morphologically similar taxa included in our study, we provide the two most conserved ITS domains, the D1-D1’ and Box-B helices for Calochaete cimrmanii , Tolypothrix sp. PCC 7504 from cluster “B”, Spirirestis rafaelensis Flechtner et Johansen in Flechtner et al. (2002: 6) WJT-71-NPBG6 from cluster “A”, and Calothrix sp. PCC 7507 from a cluster phylogenetically distant from Calochaete ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ). It can be clearly seen that Calochaete cimrmanii and Tolypothrix PCC 7504 are significantly similar in both structures, especially in the basal parts and the bottom halves of the loops ( Figs 3A, B, E, F View FIGURE 3 ). Concurrently, there are obvious differences in the top portions of the loops, supporting our decision to separate Calochaete from the traditional genus Tolypothix. The similarity of the secondary structures decreases when comparing Calochaete with Spirirestis as a representative of cluster “A” and the most phylogenetically but supposedly morphologically related Calothrix .

CBFS

University of South Bohemia

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF