Rovnoxestus, DIETRICH & DMITRIEV & PERKOVSKY, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/palaeoentomology.4.5.10 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:017144C7-07F1-43B3-96F2-E0F205342140 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5530177 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1A5887F3-FFD4-FFF2-FF24-F968CE5FFD5B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rovnoxestus |
status |
gen. nov. |
Rovnoxestus View in CoL gen. nov.
( Figs 1–4 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 )
Type species. Rovnoxestus rasnitsyni View in CoL sp. nov. here designated.
Etymology. The genus name, a masculine noun, was formed by combining the name of the fossil amber, Rovno, with an abbreviation of the name of a possibly related modern genus, Xestocephalus ; from Greek: ξεστός, smooth, polished.
Diagnosis. The new genus differs from other fossil and modern cicadellid genera in having the following combination of traits: head slightly broader than pronotum with anterior margin slightly produced and rounded to face, ocelli on anterior margin well separated from eyes, lateral frontal sutures extended to ocelli; forewing fully developed, venation somewhat elevated and complete, appendix very narrow; hind wing well developed with submarginal vein narrowly separated from apical margin; front tibia with stout anteroventral seta near midlength; hind femur macrosetal formula 2+2+1, tarsomere I with elongate ventromesal seta at apex.
Rovnoxestus resembles Xestocephalites Dietrich & Gonçalves, 2014 from Eocene Baltic amber in overall habitus and in having a stout anteroventral seta near the midlength of the front femur, but differs in having the head wider than the pronotum, the pronotum relatively long, the hind femur macrosetal formula 2+2+1, and hind tarsomere I with an elongate ventroapical seta.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.