Nipponodipogon gusenleitnerorum Loktionov et Lelej, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.25221/fee.363.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BF7D96E7-78FA-4CBE-B8DE-25B7A58F26C4 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/187787D3-FF9C-BF56-C2AF-FEFEFCC3CF91 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Nipponodipogon gusenleitnerorum Loktionov et Lelej |
status |
sp. nov. |
Nipponodipogon gusenleitnerorum Loktionov et Lelej View in CoL , sp. n.
Figs 1–9 View Figs 1–3 View Figs 4–9
TYPE MATERIAL. Holotype – ♀, Laos: Phongsaly Prov., Phongsaly Env.,
21°41'N, 102°6'E, 1500 m, 6–17. V GoogleMaps 2004 (Vít Kubáň) [ OLL]. Paratypes – Laos GoogleMaps :
Phongsaly Prov., Phongsaly Env., 21°41'N, 102°6'E, 1500 m, 6–17.V 2004, 3 ♀ GoogleMaps
(Vít Kubáň) [ OLL]; Laos: Phongsaly Prov., Phongsaly Env., 21°41'N, 102°6'E GoogleMaps ,
1500 m, 28. V –20. VI 2003, 1 ♀ (Vít Kubáň) [ IBSS] .
DIAGNOSIS. FEMALE. Outer apicoventral corner of metafemur produced triangularly. T1 with long petiole basally ( Fig. 8 View Figs 4–9 ). Propodeum without groove anteromedially, with coarse transverse rugae media- and posterolaterally ( Figs 6, 8 View Figs 4–9 ).
Fore wing vein r long, 0.35–0.45 times as long as Rs 3 ( Fig. 2 View Figs 1–3 ). Mesosoma completely black ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–3 ). MALE. Unknown.
1 – habitus, dorso-lateral view; 2 – fore wing; 3 – hind wing. Scale bar: 1 mm.
DESCRIPTION. FEMALE. Body length 6.5–7.7 mm; fore wing length 5.9–7.0
mm. Head, mesosoma and metasoma black ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–3 ); mandibles brownish; antenna black, except F3–F10 muddy yellow ventrally. Legs yellowish-brown with tibiae apically and tarsi darker. Fore wing barely infuscate, with two distinct fuscous bands
( Fig. 2 View Figs 1–3 ). Hind wing barely infuscate, with somewhat darker apical portion ( Fig. 3 View Figs 1–3 ).
Head and mesosoma matt. Frons, vertex, and mesosoma, except propodeum, finely and densely punctate. Pronotum finely striate laterally. Mesopleuron coarser punctate than frons. Upper mesopleuron and metapleuron finely and densely striate. Disc of metanotum punctate, sometimes with oblique longitudinal or transverse fine
4 – head, frontal view; 5 – head, dorsal view; 6 – metapostnotum and propodeum, dorsal view; 7 – head, lateral view; 8 – mesoscutellum, metanotum, metapostnotum, propodeum and T1, dorsal view; 9 – metaclaws.
striae. Lateral side of metanotum with several regular oblique striae. Propodeum coarsely and densely punctate anteriorly, with fine transverse rugae posteriorly and much coarse rugae media- and posterolaterally ( Figs 6, 8 View Figs 4–9 ); with indistinct longitudinal groove anteromedially ( Figs 6, 8 View Figs 4–9 ). Metasoma somewhat polished ( Fig. 8 View Figs 4–9 ). T1–T5
with very fine punctures; T6 and S6 less polished than other segments, with scattered setiferous pores located on all exposed portion; S1–S5 with somewhat larger punctures than on T1–T5. S1 with several longitudinal rugae anteriorly. Transverse groove on S2 well impressed and gently arcuate.
Body with gray pubescence mostly short, but longer on propodeum posterolaterally. Body without setae except following: upper frons with one long erect setae and a few shorter ones; clypeus with a few long suberect setae anteriorly; mandible with long and stout setae; S2–S5 with scattered short erect setae posteriorly; T6 and
S6 with denser long erect pale setae.
Head in frontal view 1.1–1.2 times as wide as height ( Fig. 4 View Figs 4–9 ). Vertex slightly convex between eye tops ( Fig. 4 View Figs 4–9 ). Upper frons slightly convex in profile ( Fig. 7 View Figs 4–9 ).
Frons with median line ( Fig. 5 View Figs 4–9 ). Supra-antennal area of frons produced anteriorly into frontal ledge overhanging antennal radicle ( Fig. 7 View Figs 4–9 ). Inner orbits slightly con-
vergent above and subparallel below ( Fig. 4 View Figs 4–9 ). Half of MID 1.3–1.4 times as long as eye width. Ocelli large, slightly raised; ocellar triangle acute-angled ( Fig. 5 View Figs 4–9 );
POD/OOD = 0.70–0.85. Posterior margin of vertex in dorsal view barely concave medially ( Fig. 5 View Figs 4–9 ). Gena in dorsal view slightly developed ( Fig. 5 View Figs 4–9 ). Clypeus convex medially, with distinct concavity basolaterally; anterolateral corner broadly rounded;
anterior margin barely emarginate medially; 2.7–2.9 times as wide as height. Apical margin of labrum broadly rounded. Mandible with two subapical teeth. Maxillary cardo with two tufts of thin and pale bristles. Malar space short. Gena noticeably narrowing towards vertex ( Fig. 7 View Figs 4–9 ). Antenna short, stout, and thickened toward middle of flagellum; F1–F3 distinctly widening toward apex; apex of apical fla-
gellomere pointed; F1 0.95–1.0 times as long as F2; F1 2.6–2.8 times as long as width and 0.65–0.70 times as long as UID.
Pronotum with anterior declivity flattened and somewhat concave, not distinctly differentiated from dorsum; dorsum in dorsal view slightly narrowing anteriorly;
shoulder not swollen, but gently rounded; juncture between dorsal and lateral faces narrowly and roundly raised; posterior margin barely arcuately emarginate medially.
Mesoscutum evenly and barely convex with posterolateral rim not raised; parapsidal sulcus distinctly impressed. Discs of mesoscutellum and metanotum hardly raised above level of mesoscutum and propodeum. Metapostnotum narrow and practically linear, deeply sunken between metanotum and propodeum ( Fig. 6 View Figs 4–9 ). Propodeum evenly convex with flattened posterior declivity not well differentiated from dorsum.
Fore wing ( Fig. 2 View Figs 1–3 ) with r 0.35–0.45 times as long as Rs 3. SMC2 receiving crossvein 1m-cu at basal 0.4–0.5. SMC3 1.1–1.3 times as long as SMC2 on vein M,
and 0.7–0.9 on vein Rs, receiving crossvein 2m-cu at basal 0.54–0.55. Crossvein
2rs-m straight or sometimes hardly curved; crossvein 3rs-m barely curved; crossvein cu-a barely postfurcal. Hind wing ( Fig. 3 View Figs 1–3 ). Outer apicoventral corner of metafemur produced triangularly. Claws symmetrical with large subapical inner tooth ( Fig. 9 View Figs 4–9 ).
T1 distinctly petiolate ( Fig. 8 View Figs 4–9 ). S6 with longitudinal median rounded carina posteriorly.
MALE. Unknown.
DISTRIBUTION. Laos.
ETYMOLOGY. It is a pleasure for us to name the new species after well-known entomologists, Josef Gusenleitner and his son Fritz Gusenleitner (Biologiezentrum des Oberösterreichischen Landesmuseums, Linz, Austria).
REMARKS. The female of new species is closely related to that of Nipponodipogon orientalis Loktionov, Lelej et Xu, 2017 in having propodeum with coarse transverse rugae posterolaterally ( Figs 6, 8 View Figs 4–9 ), outer apicoventral corner of metafemur produced triangularly and T1 petiolate basally. But it can be easily distinguished by the following characters: mesosoma completely black ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–3 ) (completely yellow orange in N. orientalis ); disc of propodeum with indistinct groove anteromedially
( Figs 6, 8 View Figs 4–9 ) (with distinct groove in N. orientalis ); F1 2.6–2.8 times as long as width
(2.2–2.4 times in N. orientalis ); fore wing vein r long, 0.35–0.45 times as long as
Rs 3 ( Fig. 2 View Figs 1–3 ) (short, 0.15–0.27 times in N. orientalis ).
V |
Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium |
VI |
Mykotektet, National Veterinary Institute |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |