Actinopus rufipes ( Lucas, 1834 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/megataxa.2.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D8203766-9E7B-468F-9E75-F21393A1BA3D |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0975136A-FFC1-CE0E-FCD5-FD17D9863B7C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2021-02-23 09:29:51, last updated by Diego 2021-10-25 17:35:43) |
scientific name |
Actinopus rufipes ( Lucas, 1834 ) |
status |
|
Actinopus rufipes ( Lucas, 1834)
Figs 1, 68–72, Map 5
Pachyloscelis rufipes Lucas, 1834: 361 , pl. 7C, fig. 1 (holotype ♀,
Brazil, MNHN, not located). Cratoscelis rufipes: Lucas, 1834: 362 , pl. 7, fig. D2. Sphodros lucasi Walckenaer, 1837: 251 . Actinopus rufipes: Lucas, 1837: 376 ; Mello-Leit„o, 1923: 27;
Bücherl, 1957: 384; World Spider Catalog, 2020.
Note. As the type is lost, the specimens here attributed to A. rufipes were so identified based on the known geographic range of the species and in morphological characteristics highlighted in both the original description and in the redescription by Mello-Leit„o (1923).
Diagnosis. Males of A. rufipes resemble those of A. ipioca ( Fig. 88 A–C), A. itaqui ( Fig. 91 A–C), A. mesa ( Fig. 97 A–C) and A. caxiuana ( Fig. 100 A–C) by BTA placed medially on prolateral tegular surface, those of A. nattereri ( Fig. 67 A–C), A. itaqui , A. mesa , A. caxiuana and A. utinga ( Fig. 103 A–C) by PA developed with a pronounced border in prolateral view; they resemble those of A. itaqui by the equidistant keels in prolateral view; and differ from those of A. nattereri , A. vilhena , A. harveyi ( Fig. 78 A–C), A. mesa and A. utinga by the inconspicuous serrated area, represented by few cusps. males differs from those of all species of the group nattereri by the large area delimited by keels, reaching nearly 35% of tegulum length in prolateral view; serrated area very inconspicuous, represented by few small cusps on retrolateral surface, below embolar base; embolus wide, flattened ( Fig. 72 A–C). Also diagnostic is the palpal patella and tibia, paler than other palpal articles. Females differ from those of other species with non-lobed spermathecae by the triangular receptacle apex ( Fig. 72 D); coxae, trochanters, femora of legs and palp, darker than other articles (Fig. 01 A).
MALE (IBSP 161468): Total length 18.62; Carapace, long 8.75; wide 8.25. Carapace anterior part tapering. Anterior eye row slightly procurved, posterior row recurved ( Fig.68 B). Three bristles betweenAME-clypeus. Sternum with eight sigilla strongly fused medially, as a single central spot ( Fig. 68 C). Rastellum protuberant, inverted V-shaped, hirsute, with two spines apically ( Fig. 68 E–F). Chelicerae with denticles along retrolateral row of teeth. Prolateral row with four megateeth and two basal teeth. Retrolateral row with six megateeth and two denticles between row of megateeth ( Fig. 68 D). Patella and tibia III with distal crown of developed thorns, not interrupted in middle ( Fig. 69 A–B). Patellae III and IV with spines on prolaterodorsal face ( Fig. 69 A, C). Tibia IV without spines on dorsal surface and with two clear rows of trichobothria ( Fig. 69 D). Ventral pseudoscopulae occupying 10% of Tarsi I, 30% of II and 100% of III and IV, without pseudoscopula on all metatarsi. Pseudoscopula of tarsi I and II with setae spaced, forming diffuse group of bristles; on tarsi III and IV, compact. Carapace, chelicerae, sternum and distal articles of legs, reddish brown; coxae, trochantera, femora and cymbium of legs brown; patella and tibia of palp pale than other articles; abdomen gray ( Fig. 68 A). Eyes: Diameters: PME 0.3, PLE 0.4 ALE 0.55, AME 0.45; MOQ: Length 1.5, front width 3.5, back width 3.56; Interdistances: PME–PME 2.18, PLE–PME 0.12, AME–AME 0.37, ALE–AME 0.87, ALE–PLE 0.75, AME–PME 0.68. Ocular area: OAL 6.25, OAW 4.91, and IF 3.25. Body: Clypeus: 0.37; Fovea: 3.5; Labium: long 1.75; wide 1.5; Chelicerae: long 5.12; wide 2.5; Sternum: long 5.37; wide 4.75. Abdomen: long 9.25; wide 5.75. Leg measurements: I: Fe 8.12/ Pa 3.75/ Ti 4.75/ Me 5.87/ Ta 3.25/ total 25.75. II: 7.75/ 3.75/ 4/ 5.75/ 3.25/ 24.5. III: 6.5/ 4.12/ 3.62/ 6/ 3.62/ 23.87. IV: 9.12/ 4/ 7/ 6.87/ 3.62/ 30.625. Formula 123. Spination: I—Fe v0, d0, p0, r0; Pa v0, d0, p0, r0; ti v0-0-3, d0, p0, r0; Me v2-4- 4, d0, p0-1-3, r0-0-5; ta v0-0-1, d0, p1-2-2, r1-5-5. II—Fe v0, d0, p0, r0; Pa v0, d0, p0, r0; ti v0, d0, p0, r0-1-5; Me v1-2-5, d0, p0-0-2, r5-3-4; ta v0-0-2, d0, p0-2-3, r1-6-4. III—Fe v0, d0, p0, r0; Pa v0, d3-3-21, p0, r0; ti v0-0-2, d0-1-10, p0-0-5, r0-0-5; Me v1-1-6, d0, p1-2-4, r0-2-4; ta v0, d0, p0-6-0, r0-2-5; IV—Fe v0, d0, p0, r0; Pa v0, d11-15-4, p0, r0; ti v0-0-3, d0, p0, r0; Me v1-1-2, d0, p0, r0-0-5; ta v0-0-3, d0, p1-5-8, r0-0-3. Palp: PA developed, embolus robust, with three keels (PAc, PI and PS) equally spaced. Basal surface of tegulum without swelling above PA. PA contiguous to PI in prolateral view. BTA well developed and placed medially on prolateral tegular surface; prolateral tegulum serrated next to base of next to base of embolus; embolar bases thicker ( Fig. 72 A–C). FEMALE ( CAD 77): Total length 14.75; Carapace, long 8.25; wide 8.50. Carapace anterior part square. Anterior eye row slightly procurved, posterior row recurved. Short bristles forming a row between AME-clypeus, one long bristle between PLE–ALE, short and long bristles between posterior eyes-fovea and short bristles between lateral eyes-edge of carapace ( Fig. 70 B). Sternum with eight sigilla strongly fused medially, all sigilla very fused to each other ( Fig. 70 C). Rastellum protuberant, subquadrate, hirsute, with row of spines on edge of MAP 5. Distribution map of Actinopus vilhena sp. nov., Actinopus rufipes ( Lucas, 1834) , Actinopus nattereri (Doleschall, 1871) sp. nov., Actinopus utinga sp. nov., Actinopus caxiuana sp. nov., Actinopus mesa sp. nov., Actinopus xingu sp. nov., Actinopus itaqui sp. nov., Actinopus ipioca sp. nov., Actinopus itapitocai sp. nov. and Actinopus harveyi sp. nov.
rastellum and o lot of spines in dorsal part of rastellum between the row placed on the edge ( Fig. 70 E–F). Chelicerae with eleven denticles along prolateral row of teeth. Prolateral row with four megateeth and two teeth in basal portion. Retrolateral row with six megateeth and one tooth between five and six basal megateeth ( Fig. 70 D). Patella and tibia III with distal developed crowns of thorns, in patella III interrupted ( Fig. 71 A–B). Patella IV with prolaterodorsal spines along extension of article and two rows of trichobothria ( Fig. 71 C). Tibia IV without spines and with long bristles on prolaterodorsal surface ( Fig. 71 D). Carapace, chelicerae, sternum, coxae, trochantera, femora, reddish brown; patellae, tibia, metatarsi, and tarsi yellowish red and abdomen pale brown with many long bristles ( Fig. 70A). 20 labial cuspules, 147 on right maxilla and 142 on left. Eyes: Diameters: PME 0.32 PLE 0.48 ALE 0.48, AME 0.36; MOQ: Length 1.52, front width 4, back width 3.84; Interdistances: PME–PME 2.24, PLE– PME 0.16, AME–AME 0.44, ALE–AME 1.32, ALE–PLE 0.84, AME–PME 0.84. Ocular area: OAL 7.2, OAW 5.1, and IF 3.62. Body: Clypeus: 0.62; Fovea: 4; Labium: long 2.75; wide 1.87; Chelicerae: long 4.12; wide 3.37; Sternum: long 5.87; wide 5.25. Abdomen: long 9; wide 6.75. Leg measurements: I: Fe 5/ Pa 3.37/ Ti 2.5/ Me 3/ Ta 1.62/ total 15.5. II: 5/ 3.5/ 2.37/ 3/ 1.62/ 15.5. III: 4.37/ 3.87/ 1.75/ 3.25/ 1.12/ 14.37. IV: 6.25/ 4.12/ 4.12/ 4.12/ 1.5/ 20.12. Formula 4123. Spination: I—Fe v0, d0, p0, r0; Pa v0, d0, p0, r0; ti v0, d0, p0-4-3, r9-12-10; Me v0-0-3, d0, p4-6-4, r7-14-15; ta v0-0-3, d0, p2-3-3, r7- 6-3. II—Fe v0, d0, p0, r0; Pa v0, d0, p0, r0; ti v0-0-2, d0, p0-0-1, r11-23-28; Me v0-0-1, d0, p1-6-5, r11-11-6; ta v0-0-2, d0, p2-6-4, r7-8-4. III—Fe v0, d0, p0, r0; Pa v0, d0-3-33, p0-0-3, r0-0-15; ti v0, d1-0-12, p0-0-3, r5-15- 10; Me v0-0-3, d0-0-4, p0-2-3, r6-13-10; ta v15-17-12, d0-1-2, p2-5-5, r4-6-5; IV—Fe v0, d0, p0, r0; Pa v0, d10- 15-7, p0-1-0, r0; ti v0, d0, p0, r0; Me v0-0-2, d0-0-1, p0- 4-4, r0; ta v6-19-20, d0, p3-5-3, r0-0-3. Spermathecae: Seminal receptacles slightly asymmetrical, as long as wide, with short ducts. Both receptacles without lobes, with triangular apex. Pore distribution reaching less than apical half of each receptacle ( Fig. 72 D).
VARIATION
MALES (n=10): Eyes: Diameters: PME 0.16–0.32. PLE 0.28–0.4. ALE 0.36–0.60. AME 0.40–0.48; MOQ: Length 1.12–1.50. front width 2.52–3.5. back width 2.44– 3.76; Interdistances: PME–PME 1.52–2.18. PLE–PME
0.8–0.16. AME–AME 0.16–0.4. ALE–AME 0.56–0.95. ALE–PLE 0.52–0.76. AME–PME 0.44–0.68. Ocular area: OAL 2.48–6.25. OAW 2.44–6.12. and IF 2–3.75. Body: Total length: 13.75–18.75; Carapace: long 6.62– 9; wide 6–8.25; Clypeus: 0.12–0.37; Fovea: 2.62–3.5; Labium: long 1.37–1.87; wide 1.12–1.62; Chelicerae:
long 2.5–5.12; wide 1.87–2.62; Sternum: long 4.12–5.37;
wide 3.62–4.75.Abdomen: long 7–9.25; wide 4.87–7. Leg measurements: I: Fe 6.37–8.12/ Pa 2.87–3.75/ Ti 3.62– 4.75/ Me 4.25–5.87/ Ta 2.5–3.5/ total 19.62–25.75. II: 6.12–7.75/ 2.62–3.75/ 3.62–4.25/ 3.75–5.75/ 2.62–3.62/ 18.75–24.5. III: 4.75–6.5/ 2.75–4.12/ 2.62–3.62/ 4.37–6/ 2.62–3.62/ 17.12–23.87. IV: 6.5–9.12/ 2.87–4/ 5.25–7/ 5.25–6.87/ 3–3.87/ 23.12–30.62. FEMALES (n=3): Eyes: Diameters: PME 0.28–0.4. PLE 0.4–0.48. ALE 0.4–0.52. AME 0.2–0.36; MOQ: Length 1. 2–1.52. front width 3. 82–4. back width 3.08–3.84; Interdistances: PME–PME 1.76–2.24. PLE–PME 0.8–0.16. AME–AME 0.24–0.44. ALE–AME 0.96–1.32. ALE–PLE 0.48–0.84. AME–PME 0.64–0.84. Ocular area: OAL 5. 8–7.2. OAW 4.66–5.1. and IF 2.3–3.62. Body: Total length: 14.75–17.16; Carapace: long 7.3–8,25; wide 7.08–8.5; Clypeus: 0.5– 0.7; Fovea: 3.33–4; Labium: long 2–2.75; wide 1.5–1.87; Chelicerae: long 3.75–4.12; wide 2.75–3.37; Sternum: long 4.66–5.87; wide 4.25–5.25. Abdomen: long 9–9.12; wide 6.37–6.75. Leg measurements: I: Fe 3.37–5/ Pa 2.87–3.35/ Ti 1.87–2.5/ Me 2.25–3/ Ta 1.5–1.62/ total
12.5–15.5. II: 4–5/ 2.87–3.5/ 2–2.37/ 2.37–3/ 1–1.62/
12.37–15.5. III: 3.87–4.37/ 3–3.87/ 1.12–1.75/ 2.75–3.25/ 1.12–1.25/ 12–14.37. IV: 5.37–6.25/ 3.12–4.12/ 3.12– 4.12/ 3.12–4.12/ 1.37–1.5/ 16.25–20.12. Formula 4123.
Distribution. BRAZIL. Maranh„o: Tutóia. Bahia: Jaborandi. Mato Grosso: Aripuan„. Mato Grosso do Sul: Paranaíba, and Três Lagoas. S„o Paulo: Luiz Antônio. Minas Gerais: Belo Horizonte, and S„o Gonçalo do Rio Preto (Map 5).
Material examined: BRAZIL. Maranh „o: Tutóia , [2° 45’ S 42° 16’ W], 1♁ 2♀, xi.1936, A. Silvio leg. ( IBSP 103432 View Materials ) GoogleMaps . Bahia: Jaborandi, [13° 35’ S 44° 32’ W], Veredas do Oeste Bahiano, Refúgio da Vida Silvestre , 1♁, 13.xi.2007, R. Recorder leg. ( IBSP 114491 View Materials ) GoogleMaps . Mato Grosso: Aripuanã, Chapada Darnadelos , 10º 10’ S 59º 27’ O, 2♁, 02–13.xi.1996, G. Skuk leg. ( MZSP 15428 View Materials ) GoogleMaps . Mato Grosso do Sul: Paranaíba, [19° 40’ S 51° 10’ W], 1♁, 03.xi.1983, R. R. da Silva leg. ( IBSP 110502 View Materials ); três Lagoas , [21° 37’ S 52° 50’ W], Fazenda Canãa, 1♁, F. Lane leg. ( MZSP 5348 View Materials ) GoogleMaps . Minas Gerais: Diamantina, Parque Estadual do
Biribiri , [18º 07’ 13.19”S 43º 34’ 47.69”W], 1♁, A. H. Apolinario & J. P. L. Guadanucci leg. ( CAD 615), 1♀, 05–10.xi.2012, A. H.Apolinario & J. P. L. Guadanucci leg. ( CAD 614); S„o Gonçalo do Rio Preto, Parque Estadual do Rio Preto ( PERP), [18° 9’ 15” S 43° 20’ 50” W], 1♀, 16.iii.2010, Aleatório ( CAD 77); 2♁, 20–25.x.2010, G. Monteiro, F. Sá, W. F. Silva & J. P. L. Guadanucci leg. ( CAD 264); Belo Horizonte, Estaç„o Ecológica da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais ( UFMG) GoogleMaps , 19° 58’ S 43° 58’ W, Creche, 1♁, 14.ix.1999 ( UFMG 589 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; v.1999, E. S. S. Álvares leg. ( UFMG 583 View Materials ) . S„o Paulo, Luiz Antônio, Estaç„o Ecológica de Jataí ( EEJ) , [21º 36’ 54” S 47º 48’ 02” W], 1♁, 6–12.xi.2009, A. G. Cristovão leg. ( IBSP 161461 View Materials , 161462 View Materials , 161463 View Materials , 161464 View Materials , 161465 View Materials , 161466 View Materials , 161468 View Materials , 161469 View Materials , 161470 View Materials , 161471 View Materials , 161472 View Materials , 161473 View Materials , 161474 View Materials , 161475 View Materials , 161476 View Materials , 161477 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 2♁ ( IBSP 161479 View Materials ) ; 3♁ ( IBSP 161467 View Materials , one removed for SEM) .
Bucherl, W. (1957) Sobre a importancia dos bulbos copuladores e das apofises tibiais dos machos na sistematica das aranhas caranguejeiras (Orthognatha). Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, 29, 377 - 416.
Lucas, H. (1834) Memoire sur un nouveau genre d'Araneide de l'Ordre des Pulmonaires. Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France, 3, 359 - 365.
Lucas, H. (1837) Observations sur les araneides du genre Pachyloscelis, et synonymie de ce genre. Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France, 6, 369 - 392.
World Spider Catalog (2020) World Spider Catalog. Natural History Museum Bern. Available from: http: // wsc. nmbe. ch (accessed on 22 July 2020)
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
UFMG |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Actinopus rufipes ( Lucas, 1834 )
Miglio, Laura Tavares, Pérez-Miles, Fernando & Bonaldo, Alexandre B. 2020 |
Pachyloscelis rufipes
Lucas, H. 1834: 361 |
1 (by plazi, 2021-02-23 09:29:51)
2 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-10-25 18:51:44)
3 (by diego, 2021-11-08 20:44:00)
4 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-11-08 21:16:45)
5 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-11-08 21:48:45)
6 (by admin, 2022-04-08 02:52:31)
7 (by admin, 2022-04-08 03:19:51)
8 (by diego, 2022-07-25 18:08:07)
9 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-07-25 18:16:26)
10 (by plazi, 2023-11-01 21:43:36)
11 (by ExternalLinkService, 2023-11-01 23:22:13)
12 (by ExternalLinkService, 2023-11-02 13:15:06)