Actinopus pampa Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.2.1.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D8203766-9E7B-468F-9E75-F21393A1BA3D |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5655653 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0975136A-FF22-CEED-FCD5-F867DE7B3A02 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Actinopus pampa Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018 |
| status |
|
Actinopus pampa Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018 View in CoL
Actinopus pampa Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018: 55 View in CoL View Cited Treatment , fig. 27 A–J, 28 A–E, 45 (holotype ♂, [36º 37’ S 64º 17’ W], Santa Rosa, La Pampa, Argentina, iv–v.1967, Aravena leg., MACN-Ar 28419; and paratype ♀, [37º 59’ S 65º 35’ W], Parque Nacional “Lihuél Calel”, La Pampa, Argentina, i.1983, P. Goloboff leg., MACN-Ar 36623; not examined); World Spider Catalog, 2020.
Diagnosis. Males of Actinopus pampa resemble all other species of group tutu , except A. itacolomi and A. longipalpis , by PA continuous to PI. They resemble those of A. azaghal , A. longipalpis , and A. pindapoy by BTA dorsally on the embolus apex and differ from all other species of the genus by a depression at embolus base. Females resemble those of A. tutu and A. azaghal by subquadrate shape of receptacles, composed of a unique lobe but Males differ from those of pore distribution reaching 75% of receptacles length. They further differ from A. itacolomi by receptacles with tapered apex and lateral swellings.
Description. See Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff (2018: 55).
Distribution. ARGENTINA: La Pampa.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Actinopus pampa Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018
| Miglio, Laura Tavares, Pérez-Miles, Fernando & Bonaldo, Alexandre B. 2020 |