Actinopus patagonia Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018

Miglio, Laura Tavares, Pérez-Miles, Fernando & Bonaldo, Alexandre B., 2020, Taxonomic Revision of the Spider Genus Actinopus Perty, 1833 (Araneae, Mygalomorphae, Actinopodidae), Megataxa 2 (1), pp. 1-256 : 154

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.2.1.1
publication LSID	lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D8203766-9E7B-468F-9E75-F21393A1BA3D
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5655637
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0975136A-FF14-CEC4-FF77-FC99DA3E3BB4
treatment provided by	Plazi
scientific name	Actinopus patagonia Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018
status

Treatment

Actinopus patagonia Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018 View in CoL

Actinopus patagonia Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018: 59 View in CoL View Cited Treatment , fig. 29 A–H, 30 A–E, 45 (holotype ♂, [38º 48’ S 62º 57’ W], Salina Las Barrancas, Buenos Aires, Argentina, iv.1960, MACN-Ar 27097; paratype ♀, [42º 28’ S 63º 37’ W], Caleta Valdés (Península de Valdés), Isla de los Guanacos, Buenos Aires, Argentina, xii.1981, P. Domíngues and P. Goloboff, MACN-Ar 27100; not examined); World Spider Catalog, 2020.

Diagnosis. Males of A. patagonia ( Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018, fig. 29 A–H) resembles A. osbournei ( Fig. 133 C View FIGURE 133 ), A. dioi ( Fig. 136 C View FIGURE 136 ) and all species of group goloboffi ( Ríos, 2014, figs 1–12; Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018, fig 38 A–G, 39 A–H, 40 A–D) by two basal and two proximal sigilla merged on the middle of portions basal and proximal of sternum. They differ from those of group goloboffi by absence of central depression on the middle of sternum. They resemble those of the two species of group goloboffi ( Fig. 135 View FIGURE 135 A–C, Fig. 138 View FIGURE 138 A–C) by the position of BTA on the tegulum and three keels in prolateral view of the tegulum. Differs from A. osbournei and A. dioi by wider embolus and PA developed; differs from A. dioi by elongated shape of the copulatory bulb. The females differs from A. gerschiapelliarum (Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018, fig. 19 C–D) by a smaller constriction below external lobes on each receptacle and by presence of pores on all the length of receptacles.