Paravelia daza, Padilla-Gil, Dora Nancy & Moreira, Felipe Ferraz Figueiredo, 2011
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.207454 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3500357 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FFEE72-FFC8-6545-FF63-FE39FEA0F878 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Paravelia daza |
status |
sp. nov. |
Paravelia daza View in CoL sp. n.
( Figs. 1–20 View FIGURES 1 – 2. P. d a z a View FIGURE 3. P. d a z a View FIGURES 4 – 6. P. d a z a. 4 – 5 View FIGURE 7. P. d View FIGURE 8. P. d )
Type material. Holotype, apt 3, allotype apt Ƥ: COLOMBIA, Departamento Nariño, Municipio Pasto, Daza , 30.VI.2009, leg. D.N. Padilla & O. Arcos ( ICN). Paratypes, same data as holotype, 10 apt 3, 10 apt Ƥ ( ICN), 15 apt 3, 15 apt Ƥ (PSO-CZ), 4 apt 3, 5 apt Ƥ (CP). Nariño, Tangua, Las Piedras, 24.VI.2009, leg. D.N. Padilla 1 apt 3, 1 apt Ƥ (PSO-CZ).
Additional material. COLOMBIA, Departamento Nariño, Municipio Pasto, Daza , 12.X.2009, 20 apt 3, 16 apt Ƥ. Nariño, Pasto, Corregimiento Mocondino, Vereda Dolores, 18.XI.2009, 2 apt 3, 2 apt Ƥ. Nariño, Tangua, Las Piedras, 16.XI.2009, 7 apt 3, 10 apt Ƥ, all leg. D.N. Padilla & O. Arcos (PSO-CZ).
Apterous form ( Figs. 1–2 View FIGURES 1 – 2. P. d a z a ). General color dark brown. Rostrum, first antennomere, head, anterior lobe and posterior margin of pronotum, and femora of all legs pale brown to yellowish-brown; some specimens with abdominal tergites reddish-brown. Venter of body brown-yellow. Venter of head, mesosternum and metasternum dark brown. Dorsum covered by short, recumbent black setae. Venter covered by short, recumbent yellow setae. Legs hairy. Cephalic trichobothria quite long, the posterior pair inserted at the margin of the basal constriction of the head capsule, the two anterior pairs inserted close together at the level of the frons, near eyes.
Apterous male ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 2. P. d a z a ). Length 9.2, maximum width 2.16. Head longer than wide (L/W: 1.44/1.16), bearing impressed median longitudinal line flanked by 2 (1+1) oblique rows of small lateral impressions ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3. P. d a z a MI). Eyes prominent, bearing in adults and nymphs a short ocular seta inserted between the ommatidia on the posterior part of each eye ( Figs. 3–6 View FIGURE 3. P. d a z a View FIGURES 4 – 6. P. d a z a. 4 – 5 ). Ocelli absent. Head bearing a pair of dorsal pits, near the corner of each eye ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3. P. d a z a , DI). Antenniferous tubercles well-defined ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 4 – 6. P. d a z a. 4 – 5 ). Anteclypeus and ventral lobes of head prominent ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3. P. d a z a , AC, VL).
Antenna subflagelliform, the two basal segments relatively long and the two apical segments rather slender, bearing numerous erect hairs. Length of antennomeres I–IV: 1.30, 1.08, 0.88, 1.08. Rostrum 4-segmented, relatively long, reaching mesosternum; third article about 4 times longer than I–II combined ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 4 – 6. P. d a z a. 4 – 5 ). Ventral region of head with a pair of distinct longitudinal ridges ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 4 – 6. P. d a z a. 4 – 5 , r); the posterior margin bearing two short and slender apodemes on each side ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 4 – 6. P. d a z a. 4 – 5 , OA).
Anterior portion of prothorax with a distinct collar. Pronotal lobe ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7. P. d , PL) large, arched in the middle and posteriorly extended, covering mesonotum and most of metanotum ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 2. P. d a z a ). Pronotum (L/W: 1.92/1.96), bearing a longitudinal medial carina; anterior margin with a line of punctuations behind head vertex, prolonged on sides and venter of prothorax. Pronotal surface uneven and foveate, these foveae deep and scarce on anterior lobe, shallow and more numerous on posterior lobe. Meso- and metathoracic spiracles evident ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7. P. d , SpII, SpIII). Intersegmental suture between meso and metathorax laterally distinct ( Fig.7 View FIGURE 7. P. d ). Metepisternal process (Ep) reduced. Pair of slen- der grooves (Ev) visible, leading to metasternal scent orifices ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7. P. d , so). Metasternal scent channels obliquely curving backwards from midpoint ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8. P. d ). Mesosternum with distinct rostral groove ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8. P. d , RG). Middle and hind coxae placed laterally ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8. P. d ); intersegmental suture between mesosternum and metasternum with a shallow channel ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8. P. d ). Mesosternum and metasternum lacking tubercles ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8. P. d ).
Median length of abdominal tergites as follows: I: 0.24, II–III: 0.52, IV–VI and VIII: 0.60, VII: 0.84. Abdominal mediotergites I–III with wide and glabrous channels. Connexiva angled upward at 40º, with margins of segments II–VI thickened. Connexival margins straight and evenly convergent posteriorly ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 2. P. d a z a ). Apical margin of ventrite VI slightly concave centrally ( Fig. 9). Ventrite VIII strongly depressed at the midline. Genital segments large and distinctly protruding from the end of the pregenital abdomen. Proctiger with two lateral, conspicuous and divergent prolongations in dorsal basal half ( Fig. 10). Genital capsule as in Fig. 11; pygophore ( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12. P ); claspers symmetrical, relatively large, with oval tip ( Figs. 11, 13 View FIGURE 13. P ).
Hind legs distinctly longer than others ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 2. P. d a z a ). Male grasping comb extending for about three-fifths of fore tibia ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14. P. d a z a ). Middle and hind coxae slightly longer than fore coxae and inserted laterally to body center ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8. P. d ). Femora slightly incrassate, lacking spines or spinose setae. Tibiae slender, straight, with grooming structures at apex ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15. P. d a z a ). Tarsi three-segmented; with first segments small, and subtriangular, and claws subterminal.
Length of leg segments as follows: fore femur / tibia / tarsal 1 / tarsal 2 / tarsal 3: 2.0/2.16/0.12/0.28/0.5; middle femur / tibia / tarsal 1 / tarsal 2 / tarsal 3: 2.48/2.92/0.16/0.5/0.58; hind femur / tibia / tarsal 1 / tarsal 2 / tarsal 3: 3.46/5.20/0.18/0.80/0.70.
Apterous female ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 2. P. d a z a ). Length 9.8, maximum width 2.6; distinctly larger than male. Length of antennomeres I–IV: 1.30, 1.20, 0.88, 0.70. Abdomen with 8 mediotergites and 6 laterotergites ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 2. P. d a z a ). Median length of abdominal tergites as follows: I: 0.24, II: 0.64, III: 0.60, IV: 0.88, V: 0.72, VI: 0.76, VII: 0.80, VIII: 0.4. Margins of connexival segments I–IV subparallel; margins of connexival segments V–VI caudally convergent; last laterotergite infolded and almost completely covering abdominal tergites VII and VIII ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 2. P. d a z a ); connexiva ending in short spines ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 16 – 17. P. d ).
Venter of body lightly convex. Ventral apodeme of abdomen arising from anterior margin of sternum VII and extending forward to sternum V. Proctiger horizontal in relation to body ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 16 – 17. P. d ). First gonocoxae large and hairy at apex ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 16 – 17. P. d ); second gonocoxae as in Fig. 18 View FIGURES 18 – 19. P. d ; second gonapophyses with feathered outgrowths ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 18 – 19. P. d ). Gynatrial sac trapezoidal ( Fig. 20 View FIGURE 20. P. d a z a , GS) with numerous thin gland ductules projecting from the external surface of the sac ( Fig. 20 View FIGURE 20. P. d a z a ); spermathecal tube ( Fig. 20 View FIGURE 20. P. d a z a , ST) arising from ventral side of gynatrial sac; fecundation canal ( Fig. 20 View FIGURE 20. P. d a z a , FC) short, with a pair of small apodemes basally ( Fig. 20 View FIGURE 20. P. d a z a , ap), and a pair of flattened, slightly sclerotized small strips apically; basal thickening ( Fig. 20 View FIGURE 20. P. d a z a , BT) weakly sclerotized and curved. Grasping comb very short, extending for about 1/13 of fore tibia. Tibiae slender, straight, with grooming structures at apex.
Macropterous form unknown.
Type locality. Daza , road to Villamoreno, Pasto, Nariño, Colombia ( Fig. 21).
Ecological notes. Paravelia daza sp. n. is found under stones at the erosional margins of streams. Nymphs ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 4 – 6. P. d a z a. 4 – 5 ) are occasionally found on the surface film at the borders of temporary pools. When discovered under stones, specimens remain still and camouflaged with the substrate. They can remain hidden, or stride on the superficial film very rapidly, and do not move like other veliids or gerrids. Individuals can move easily on the ground, walking or running; and it is probable that the subterminal position of their claws is a secondary adaptation towards a semi-terrestrial way of life, as Andersen (1982) suggests for other species of veliids.
Etymology. The name “ daza ” refers to type locality.
Comparative notes. Paravelia daza sp. n. is a large (9.2–9.8), brown species. It may be recognized by the length of the head three times the length of an eye ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3. P. d a z a ); the male connexiva angled upward at 40º, with parallel margins ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 2. P. d a z a ); and the oval flat side of the apex of the paramere ( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12. P ). The female connexiva are infolded, covering abdominal tergites VI–VIII ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 2. P. d a z a ), and the female genital structures are as described in Figs. 16–20 View FIGURES 16 – 17. P. d View FIGURES 18 – 19. P. d View FIGURE 20. P. d a z a . Males and the females bear a grasping comb on fore tibia ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14. P. d a z a ), and all tibiae have grooming structures ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15. P. d a z a ).
Paravelia daza sp. n. is similar to P. inveruglas (Kirkaldy, 1899) from Ecuador, but the latter is smaller (length of male 7.25 mm), and different in morphometric measurements, and in the shape of the male parameres (compare Figs. 13 View FIGURE 13. P , 22 View FIGURE 22. P ).
ICN |
Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Museo de Historia Natural |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.