Euryopis Menge, 1868
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4966.5.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:86908B62-452C-447E-B412-0F7153E1C700 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4792377 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FE8550-C424-4B0D-FF6A-FC8936ECFADE |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2021-05-10 08:06:19, last updated 2024-11-27 08:11:52) |
scientific name |
Euryopis Menge, 1868 |
status |
|
Genus Euryopis Menge, 1868 View in CoL View at ENA
Type species: Micryphantes flavomaculatus C. L. Koch, 1836 (= Euryopis flavomaculata View in CoL )
Diagnosis. Euryopis differs from Dipoena , Lasaeola and Phycosoma by the absence of carapace spherical or rounded and by the absence of distinct cervical grooves. Euryopis presents carapace oval ( Figs 1A View FIGURE 1 , 2A View FIGURE 2 , 3A View FIGURE 3 , 4A View FIGURE 4 ), not modified. Differs from Guaraniella by the cymbium without deep apical notch. Differs from Audifia by the abdomen without a sclerotized ring around the spinnerets and pedicel and differs from Audifia by the not elongate carapace. Euryopis has an oval ( Figs 1A View FIGURE 1 , 2A View FIGURE 2 , 4A View FIGURE 4 , 5A View FIGURE 5 ) or subtriangular abdomen (see Levi 1963, Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ), dorsoventrally flat ( Fig. 7D View FIGURE 7 ), sometimes project over the carapace; blackish brown to black ( Fig. 1A View FIGURE 1 ), sometimes with silver dots and males with sclerotized scutum on the dorsum ( Figs 7A, D View FIGURE 7 ). The females of Euryopis have the epigynum with an oval depression ( Fig. 9C View FIGURE 9 ); and males have a distal cymbial projection ( Fig. 8A View FIGURE 8 ), however there are some species lacking such projection ( Fig. 8D View FIGURE 8 ) or having it little pronounced ( Figs 8B, C View FIGURE 8 ).
Levi, H. W. (1963) American spiders of the genera Audifia, Euryopis and Dipoena (Araneae: Theridiidae). Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 129, 121 - 185.
FIGURE 1. Euryopis candiota n. sp. A–D. Male habitus: A, Dorsal view. B, Ventral view. C, Frontal view. D, Lateral view. Scale bars: 1 mm.
FIGURE 2. Euryopis candiota n. sp. A–D. Female habitus: A, Dorsal view. B, Ventral view. C, Frontal view. D, Lateral view. Scale bars: 1 mm.
FIGURE 3. Euryopis nasuta n. sp. A–D. Male habitus:A, Dorsal view. B, Ventral view. C, Frontal view. D, Lateral view. Scale bars: 1 mm.
FIGURE 4. Euryopis nasuta n. sp. A–D. Female habitus: A, Dorsal view. B, Ventral view. C, Frontal view. D, Lateral view. Scale bars: 1 mm.
FIGURE 5. Euryopis boliviensis n. sp. A–D. Male habitus: A, Dorsal view. B, Ventral view. C, Frontal view. D, Lateral view. Scale bars: 1 mm.
FIGURE 7. Euryopis catarinensis n. sp. A–D. Male habitus:A, Dorsal view. B, Ventral view. C, Frontal view. D, Lateral view. Scale bars: 1 mm.
FIGURE 8. Male palp Euryopis n. sp., ventral view. A, Euryopis candiota n. sp. B, Euryopis nasuta n. sp. C, Euryopis boliviensis n. sp. D, Euryopis catarinensis n. sp. Abbreviations: Cy, cymbium; E, embolus; MA, median apophysis, ST, subtegulum; T, tegulum. Scale bars: 0.25 mm.
FIGURE 9. Epigyna of new species of Euryopis. A, B. Euryopis candiota n. sp. A, Ventral view. B, Dorsal view, clarified. C, D. Euryopis nasuta n. sp.: C, Ventral view; D, Dorsal view, clarified. E, F. Euryopis boliviensis n. sp. E, Ventral view; F, Dorsal view, clarified. Abbreviations: CD, copulatory ducts; CO, copulatory openings; FD, fertilization ducts; SS, second pair of spermathecae; FS, first pair of spermathecae. Scale bars: 0.25 mm.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Hadrotarsinae |