Neodigitodesmium cheirosporum W. H. Tian & Maharachch., 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.559.2.6 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7040821 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FA87A2-FFF2-FFE7-EEF6-F8A8C2B6A6C5 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2022-08-25 06:57:35, last updated 2024-11-28 07:01:52) |
scientific name |
Neodigitodesmium cheirosporum W. H. Tian & Maharachch. |
status |
sp. nov. |
Neodigitodesmium cheirosporum W. H. Tian & Maharachch. View in CoL sp. nov. ( FIG. 2 View FIGURE 2 )
MycoBank: MB 844433
Etymology: The name refers to the cheiroid conidia
Saprobic on submerged decayed wood in aquatic habitats. Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Hyphomycetous. Conidiomata sporodochial on natural substrate, superficial, compact, dark brown to black, with base attached on the surface of substrate. Conidiophores micronematous, reduced to conidiogenous cell. Conidiogenous cells 7–12 × 5–11 μm (x̅ = 9 × 7 μm, n = 15), holoblastic, at the base of the spore, hyaline. Conidia 35–70 × 9–24 μm (x̅ = 57 ×19 μm, n = 30), solitary, dictyosporous, conical shaped, cheiroid, not complanate, consisting of 1–4 rows with each row composed of 6–10 cells, with a hyaline basal connecting cell, not easy to separate, brown, subhyaline at the tip of peripheral rows.
Culture characteristics: Conidia germinating on PDA within 12 h at 25 °C in the dark. Colonies on PDA circular, woolly at the margin, raised at the center, reverse yellow to brown center with a white margin.
Material examined: CHINA, Sichuan Province, Chengdu, Baiyungou , on submerged decayed wood, 103°24′19″ E, 30°47′52″ N, 27 September 2021, W. H. Tian BY112_3 ( HKAS 124014 View Materials , holotype), ex-type culture CGMCC 3.23623 View Materials = UESTCC 22.0020 GoogleMaps .
Notes: Combined sequences of LSU, ITS, SSU and tef1 confirmed the isolate of Neodigitodesmium formed a distinct clade in Dictyosporiaceae . However, it could not assign to any known genera ( FIG. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). In the combined gene tree, Neodigitodesmium is phylogenetically related to the Vikalpa australiensis (HKUCC 8797), Aquadictyospora lignicola (MFLUCC 17-1318) and Aquadictyospora clematidis (MFLUCC 17-2080) ( FIG. 1 View FIGURE 1 ), but they are not clustered on one branch and have obvious morphological differences. Neodigitodesmium is morphologically similar to Digitodesmium , both having sporodochial conidiomata and acrogenous, cheiroid, digitate conidia ( Kirk 1981; Nóbrega et al. 2021). However, Neodigitodesmium differs from Digitodesmium and other Dictyosporiaceae members in conicalshaped conidia, composed of 1–4 compactly arranged rows of dark brown cells, with a hyaline basal connecting conidiogenous cells ( FIG. 2 View FIGURE 2 ). Therefore, Neodigitodesmium is described as a new genus based on phylogeny and morphological evidence.
Kirk, P. M. (1981) New or interesting microfungi II. Dematiaceous hyphomycetes from Esher Common, Surrey. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 77 (2): 279 - 297. https: // doi. org / 10.1016 / S 0007 - 1536 (81) 80031 - 9
Nobrega, T., Ferreira, B. W. & Barreto, R. W. (2021) Digitodesmium polybrachiatum sp. nov., a new species of Dictyosporiaceae from Brazil. Mycological Progress 20: 1135 - 1144. https: // doi. org / 10.1007 / s 11557 - 021 - 01717 - 5
FIGURE 1. Phylogram of the best ML tree based on a combined dataset (LSU, ITS, SSU and tef1) of Dictyosporiaceae. The ML ultrafast bootstrap values/Bayesian PP greater than 75%/0.95 are indicated at the respective nodes. Type isolates are in bold, and the new taxa and synonymized taxa are indicated in red. The tree is rooted with Periconia igniaria (CBS 845.96).
FIGURE 2. Neodigitodesmium cheirosporum (HUEST 22.0020, holotype). a–c Colonies on the substrate d Squash mount of sporodochium e, f, k Conidiogenous cells g–j Conidia l–n Crushed conidium o Germinating conidium p, q Colonies on PDA after 30 days. Scale bars: d = 20 μm, e–o = 10 μm, Scale bars of e applies to e and f, Scale bars of g applies to g–o.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
1 (by plazi, 2022-08-25 06:57:35)
2 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-08-25 07:04:16)
3 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-08-25 07:04:16)
4 (by jonas, 2022-08-30 09:19:37)
5 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-08-30 11:43:13)
6 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-08-30 12:43:14)
7 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-08-30 12:43:14)
8 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-09-01 11:39:54)
9 (by plazi, 2023-11-07 10:44:03)