Agrotis experta ( Walker, 1869 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3771.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7C4129A9-DE4F-4CAE-AD88-EE14195A3E64 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5067244 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F3FD57-FFF6-FFA8-58C0-FF61FA85F84F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2016-04-11 16:14:46, last updated 2024-11-28 23:26:05) |
scientific name |
Agrotis experta ( Walker, 1869 ) |
status |
|
Agrotis experta ( Walker, 1869) View in CoL
( Figs 28, 29 View FIGURES 28 – 36 , 56 View FIGURES 56 – 63 , 74 View FIGURES 74 – 80 , 87 View FIGURES 87 – 90 , 104 View FIGURES 100 – 105 )
Laphygma experta Walker, 1869: 30 . Holotype: ♂ Peru (BMNH). Image examined.
Laphygma innotabilis Walker, 1869: 31 ; Hampson, 1903: 356 (new synonym); Poole, 1989: 50. Holotype: ♂ Peru (BMNH). Image examined.
Feltia experta (Walker) : Hampson, 1903: 356, pl. 68 fig. 18; Draudt, 1924: 55; Artigas, 1994: 582 –583 (diagnosis, life cycle, biological control, damages, hosts, economic importance, distribution, and international implications).
Chorizagrotis benefida Draudt, 1924: 51 , pl.13 row e. New synonym. Type /s: Ecuador, Rio Bamba. Type /s not found.
Agrotis experta (Walker) View in CoL : Forbes, 1933: 20; Poole, 1989: 48 (world noctuid checklist); Angulo & Olivares, 2002: 6; Angulo & Olivares, 2005: 130 (diagnosis, male genitalia).
Scotia experta (Walker) : Köhler, 1967: 303, figs 37, 38 (new combination).
Agrotis benefida (Draudt) View in CoL : Poole, 1989: 44 (new combination).
Diagnosis. Agrotis experta differs from other South American species of Agrotis by the following combination of characters: 1) forewing subcostal band and basal area undifferentiated; 2) discal cell concolorous with forewing ground color; 3) subterminal line not extended basally; 4) in male genitalia clavus subquadrate; 5) vesica 12 × as long as aedeagus; 6) in female genitalia corpus bursae 5 × as long as anterior apophysis; and 7) appendix bursae 12 × as long as corpus bursae.
Redescription. Male ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 28 – 36 ). Head. Palpus whitish ventrally; frons central projection with raised edge of rough surface, projected anteriorly into a faint point. Antenna basal half biserrate, widest at 1/5 its length, gradually tapering to apex, with apical half filiform, widest segment 2 × as wide as central shaft, anterior process slightly wider than posterior process. Thorax. Patagium slightly darker than thorax, with black medial line, in some specimens dorsal half lighter than ventral half; tegulum with black diffuse basal and marginal lines. Forewing length 15.8–17.6 mm; ground color light grayish brown to grayish brown; subcostal band and basal area undifferentiated; basal line black, double, convex between veins; antemedial line black, double, convex between veins, strongly extended as a sharp tooth between 1A+2A vein and posterior margin, coming near to wing center; claviform spot dark brown; orbicular spot oval, extending toward reniform spot, contiguous in some specimens, concolorous with ground color, black edged with grayish center; reniform spot concolorous with orbicular spot, with no streaks; discal cell concolorous with ground color; medial line undifferentiated; postmedial line black, double, concave between veins; subterminal line light brown and black edged, concave between veins; terminal line a series of darkish lunulae between veins; fringe light brown with brown medial line. Hind wing iridescent; fringe iridescent. Abdomen. Light brown. Genitalia ( Fig. 56 View FIGURES 56 – 63 ). Uncus sinuous. Clavus subquadrate, as long as wide. Ampulla 1/5 × as long as valve, basal 1/3 expanded, then narrowed to half its widest diameter; saccus subtriangular. Vesica ( Fig. 74 View FIGURES 74 – 80 ) 12 × as long as aedeagus, consisting of five wide loops, right basal diverticulum subtriangular. Female ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 28 – 36 ). Differences from male. Forewing length: 14.8–18.7 mm; antenna filiform; forewing ground color darker than male. Genitalia ( Fig. 87 View FIGURES 87 – 90 ). Posterior apophysis less than 1.5 × as long as anterior apophysis; ductus bursae 3 × as long as anterior apophysis; corpus bursae 5 × as long as anterior apophysis, signum absent, apex subtriangular; appendix bursae 12 × as long as corpus bursae, consisting of five wide loops, apex globose; ductus seminalis originating at corpus bursae apex.
Biology. Artigas (1994) gives a short diagnosis and mentions that it takes from five to eight weeks to complete the life cycle.
Hosts. Economically important hosts include: chard, sesame, alfalfa, cotton, beans, potatoes, tobacco, and tomato ( Artigas 1994).
Remarks. Either in males or females forewing pattern can be very diffuse, in some specimens with only reniform spot differentiated and orbicular spot and a single postmedial line slightly distinguished.
The description and drawing of the adult of Chorizagrotis benefida ( Draudt 1924) corresponds to light specimens of Agrotis experta .
Distribution. Peru, Ecuador, and northern Chile ( Fig. 104 View FIGURES 100 – 105 ).
Material examined. (13 ♂, 13 ♀). 3 ♀ ( USNM), ♂ (Raven) ( IMLA). CHILE: Tarapacá. Iquique, ♀ VIII-1987 (Crockwell) ( USNM). PERU: ♂ 9-II-1999 ( USNM), ♂ ( USNM). Lima. Cañete, ♂ 25-I-1941 (E.J. Hambleton) ( USNM); Huaral, ♂ ( USNM); Lima, ♂ 2 ♀ 19-II-1923 (D.S. Bullock) ( USNM), ♂ 10-XI-1963 (Raven) ( IMLA), 2 ♂ 01-VII-1964 (Raven) ( IMLA), ♀ 10-VII-1964 (Raven) ( IMLA), ♀ 18-VII-1964 (Raven) ( IMLA), ♂ 15-XI-1964 (Raven) ( IMLA); Tupe, 2 ♂ 2-XI-1926 (H.T. Tomms) ( USNM). La Libertad. Trujillo, ♂ 5 ♀ ( USNM).
Angulo, A. O. & Olivares, T. S. (2002) Catalogo de los lepidopteros noctuidos de las colecciones cientificas de la universidad de concepcion y de sus tipos ingresados despues de 1981 (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae). Boletin de la Sociedad de Biologia de Concepcion, 73, 47 - 60.
Angulo, A. O. & Olivares, T. S. (2005) Un inventario global de la subfamilia Noctuinae de Chile (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologia, 33, 131 - 166.
Artigas, J. N. (1994) Entomologia Economica. Insectos de interes agricola, forestal, medico y veterinario (nativos, introducidos o susceptibles de ser introducidos). Vol. II. Ediciones de la Universidad de Concepcion, Concepcion, Chile, 493 pp.
Draudt, M. (1924) 7. Band: Eulenrtige Nachtfalter. In: Seitz, A. (Ed.), 1919 - 1944. Die Gross-Schmetterlinge der Erde. II. Abteileng: Die Gross-Schmetterlinge des Amerikanischen Faunengebietes. Alfred Kernen, Stuttgart, pp. 1 - 508, pl. 1 - 96.
Forbes, W. T. M. (1933) A grouping of the Agrotinae genera. Entomologica americana, 14, 1 - 38, 36 pls.
Hampson, G. F. (1903) Catalogue of the Lepidoptera Phalaenae in the British Museum. Volume 4. Taylor and Francis, London, 689 pp.
Kohler, P. E. (1967) Index de los generos de las Noctuinae argentinas (Agrotinae sensu Hampson), Lep. Het. Acta Zoologica Lilloana, 21, 253 - 342.
Poole, R. W. (1989) Lepidopterorum Catalogus (new series). Fascicle 118. Noctuidae. Part 1 - 3. E. J. Brill / Flora & Fauna Publications, Leiden, New York, Kobenhavn, Koln, 1314 pp.
Walker, F. (1869) Characters of undescribed Lepidoptera Heterocera. Edward Newman, London, 112 pp.
FIGURES 28 – 36. Adults of Agrotis species, fausta - group. 28, A. experta, ♂. 29, A. experta, ♀. 30, A. fausta, ♂. 31, A. fausta, ♀. 32, A. malefida, ♂. 33, A. malefida, ♀. 34 – 35, A. canities, ♂. 36, A. canities, ♀. Actual size.
FIGURES 56 – 63. Male genitalia of Agrotis species, fausta - and robusta - group. 56, A. experta. 57, A. fausta. 58, A. malefida. 59, A. canities. 60, A. s chreiteri. 61, A. araucaria. 62, A. ipsilon. 63, A. robusta.
FIGURES 74 – 80. Male genitalia aedeagus of Agrotis species, fausta - and robusta - group. 74, A. experta. 75, A. fausta. 76, A. malefida. 77, A. canities. 78, A. araucaria. 79, A. ipsilon. 80, A. robusta.
FIGURES 87 – 90. Female genitalia of Agrotis species, fausta - group. 87, A. experta. 88, A. fausta. 89, A. malefida. 90, A. canities.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Agrotis experta ( Walker, 1869 )
Blas, Germán San 2014 |
Agrotis benefida
Poole 1989: 44 |
Scotia experta
Kohler 1967: 303 |
Agrotis experta
Angulo 2005: 130 |
Angulo 2002: 6 |
Poole 1989: 48 |
Forbes 1933: 20 |
Chorizagrotis benefida
Draudt 1924: 51 |
Feltia experta
Artigas 1994: 582 |
Draudt 1924: 55 |
Hampson 1903: 356 |
Laphygma experta
Walker 1869: 30 |
Laphygma innotabilis
Poole 1989: 50 |
Hampson 1903: 356 |
Walker 1869: 31 |
1 (by plazi, 2016-04-11 16:14:46)
2 (by ImsDioSync, 2018-06-30 05:43:20)
3 (by ExternalLinkService, 2019-09-26 06:43:20)
4 (by FigureRepair, 2020-06-03 07:28:54)
5 (by ExternalLinkService, 2020-06-03 07:35:51)
6 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-07-03 03:59:40)
7 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-07-03 08:16:15)
8 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-11-10 10:14:10)
9 (by plazi, 2023-10-25 23:47:28)
10 (by ExternalLinkService, 2023-10-26 05:31:01)