Salaria pavo ( Risso, 1810 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0179.3147 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F3D57F-ED3D-FF82-FFFE-FD1102D9F8C8 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe (2024-08-05 22:01:41, last updated 2024-08-28 19:46:42) |
scientific name |
Salaria pavo ( Risso, 1810 ) |
status |
|
Salaria pavo ( Risso, 1810) View in CoL [N] ― Peacock blenny/ Horozbina
Taxonomy. Original description: Blennius pavo Risso, 1810: 13 [Nice, France, northwestern Mediterranean Sea; no types known]. ― Synonyms: Lipophrys pavo ( Risso, 1810) . ― Revisions: None. ―Illustration: None.
Status in Türkiye. Listed in previous checklists from Türkiye by Bilecenoğlu et al. (2002, 2014); Kuru (2004); Geldiay and Balık (2007) as Blennius pavo ; Fricke et al. (2007); Kuru et al. (2014); Çiçek et al. (2015, 2020).― Turkish material: None.
Distribution and habitat. Distribution in Türkiye: Anatolian coastal watersheds, entering brackish and freshwater habitats. ― Distribution in river basins: 1-Meriç-Ergene, 2-Marmara, 3-Susurluk, 4-Kuzey Ege, 5-Gediz, 6-Küçük Menderes, 7-Büyük Menderes, 8-Batı Akdeniz, 9- Antalya, 12- Sakarya, 13-Batı Karadeniz, 14-Yeşilırmak, 15-Kızılırmak, 17-Doğu Akdeniz, 18-Seyhan, 19-Asi, 20-Ceyhan, 21-Fırat-Dicle, 22- Doğu Karadeniz, 23-Çoruh. ― General distribution: Mediterranean Sea; Sea of Marmara; Black Sea; eastern Atlantic: Bay of Biscay south to Morocco, including Madeira and Canary Islands.― Distribution in ecoregions: 418-Dniester - Lower Danube, 423-Thrace, 429-Western Anatolia, 430-Northern Anatolia, 432-Southern Anatolia, 433-Western Transcaucasia, 437-Orontes. ― Habitat: This species occurs in the intertidal zone and shallow bottoms, on rocks or sand between pebbles and vegetation. This species is tolerant to different salinities (euryhaline) and is more commonly found in brackish waters down to 5 ppt. Freshwater, brackish, marine.
Economic importance. No commercial importance.
Conservation. Conservation status in Türkiye: Unknown. ― IUCN: LC (IUCN, 2023). ― Threats: There are no known major threats for this species. ― Moderate sensitivity to human activities. ―Not considered a keystone species. ― Decline status: Stable. ― Moderate priority for conservation action.
Bilecenoglu M, Taskavak E, Mater S, Kaya M (2002). Checklist of the marine fishes of Turkey. Zootaxa 113: 1 - 194. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 113.1.1
Bilecenoglu M, Kaya M, Cihangir B, Cicek E (2014). An updated checklist of the marine fishes of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology 38: 901 - 929. https: // doi. org / 10.3906 / zoo- 1405 - 60
Cicek E, Birecikligil SS, Fricke R (2015). Freshwater fishes of Turkey; a revised and updated annotated checklist. Biharean Biologists 9 (2): 141 - 157.
Fricke R, Bilecenoglu M, Sari HM (2007). Annotated checklist of fish and lamprey species (Gnathostomata and Petromyzontomorphi) of Turkey, including a Red List of threatened and declining species. Stuttgarter Beitrage zur Naturkunde, Serie A (Biologie) (706): 1 - 172.
Geldiay R, Balik S (2007). Freshwater Fishes of Turkey. V. Edition, Ege
Kuru M (2004). Recent systematic status of inland water fishes of Turkey. Journal of Education Faculty of Gazi 24: 1 - 21.
Kuru M, Yerli SV, Mangit F, Unlu E, Alp A (2014). Fish Biodiversity in Inland Waters of Turkey. Journal of Academic Documents for Fisheries and Aquaculture 1 (3): 93 - 120.
Risso A (1810). Ichthyologie de Nice, ou histoire naturelle des poissons du Departement des Alpes Maritimes. F. Schoell, Paris. i-xxxvi + 1 - 388, Pls. 1 - 11 (in French).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |