Hydrosmecta borealis Klimaszewski and Langor
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5169545 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:843C58D8-84D7-4BAA-94C8-466B133685AF |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EE9C1F-942E-FFC1-CF8D-FAEB4A5BA0B7 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Hydrosmecta borealis Klimaszewski and Langor |
status |
|
Hydrosmecta borealis Klimaszewski and Langor View in CoL
( Fig. 1–8 View Figures 1–8 )
Hydrosmecta borealis Klimaszewski and Langor View in CoL , in Klimaszewski et al. 2011: 162.
Diagnosis. Body length 2.3–2.5 mm; subparallel, flattened, light brown to dark brown with antennae, legs and elytra slightly paler and reddish brown; moderately glossy, with fine, moderately dense punc- tation and faint meshed microsculpture on forebody ( Fig. 1 View Figures 1–8 ); head as wide as pronotum, with large and protruding eyes; antennae moderately robust, antennomere IV subquadrate and V-X slightly elongate; pronotum widest at middle, as wide as head and abdomen but narrower than elytra; elytra strongly elongate and flattened, at suture about 1.2 times as long as pronotum; abdomen subparallel, slightly narrowed apically. Male: tergite VIII truncate apically ( Fig. 4 View Figures 1–8 ); sternite VIII arcuate apically ( Fig. 5 View Figures 1–8 ); median lobe of aedeagus with narrow bulbus and wide tubus in dorsal view ( Fig. 3 View Figures 1–8 ), in lateral view apex of tubus truncate ( Fig. 2 View Figures 1–8 ), internal sac as illustrated ( Fig. 2, 3 View Figures 1–8 ). Female: tergite VIII arcuate apically ( Fig. 6 View Figures 1–8 ); sternite VIII broadly rounded apically ( Fig. 7 View Figures 1–8 ); spermatheca S-shaped ( Fig. 8 View Figures 1–8 ).
Distribution. Origin: Nearctic. Canada: NF. USA: not recorded.
Collection and habitat data. Habitat: not recorded but probably riparian habitats as in other members of the genus. Collecting period: V. Collecting method: not recorded.
Comments. This species is easily distinguishable externally from H. pseudodiosica and H. dulcis , which have similarly shaped antennae, in having larger body and longer and wider elytra. Spermatheca of H. borealis is similar to that of H. dulcis but has slightly different shape of capsule and more tightly curved stem ( Fig. 8 View Figures 1–8 ). Externally, the female holotype of H. borealis agrees with characteristics of the genus Hydrosmecta but males are needed for confirmation. The median lobe of the aedeagus has some unique features and likely was slightly damaged. More males are needed for study to confirm the morphology of the median lobe of the aedeagus and their affiliation with this species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Hydrosmecta borealis Klimaszewski and Langor
Klimaszewski, Jan, Webster, Reginald P. & Davies, Anthony 2017 |
Hydrosmecta borealis
Klimaszewski, J. & Langor, G. & Pelletier, C. & Perdereau, L. 2011: 162 |