Mnioes, Townes, 1946
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4743.2.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A3EB2E6D-C484-4E24-9613-572BE7873E21 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3688109 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E887DD-CC54-FFC1-FF16-F9C33083FE6A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2020-02-26 09:28:37, last updated 2024-11-25 12:07:16) |
scientific name |
Mnioes |
status |
|
Key to Peruvian species of Mnioes View in CoL View at ENA
1. Antenna without white- or yellow-band ( Fig. 3A View FIGURE 3 ); metasomal tergites shiny, weakly granulate ( Figs 3A and 3C View FIGURE 3 ) iskay sp. nov.
-. Antenna with white- or yellow-band or with white or yellow colour in some articles of the flagellum; metasomal tergites granulate, matte ( Fig. 1D View FIGURE 1 )................................................................................... 2
2. Propodeum and mesoscutum black with white or yellowish spots ( Figs 4A and 4C View FIGURE 4 )................................. 3
-. Propodeum and mesoscutum entirely black................................................................. 4
3. Ovipositor sheath 1.6× as long as metathoracic tibia; metasomal tergite I uniformly red; antenna with scape with truncated sections U-shaped basally ( Fig. 4B View FIGURE 4 ).............................................................. poncei sp. nov.
-. Ovipositor sheath 2.1× as long as metathoracic tibia; metasomal tergite I basally and distally yellow ( Fig. 4C View FIGURE 4 ); antenna with scape with truncated sections V-shaped basally (as in Fig. 5B View FIGURE 5 )........................................ kinsa sp. nov.
4. Antenna with yellow-band, more than 20 flagellomeres ( Fig. 5A View FIGURE 5 )..................................... pisqa sp. nov.
-. Antenna with white- or yellow-band, fewer than 14 flagellomeres............................................... 5
5. Metasoma predominantly reddish-brown, at least with tergite IV unicolor reddish-brown............................. 6
-. Metasoma predominantly black, at least with IV unicolor black................................................. 8
6. Antennal band ventrally black, dorsally white ( Fig. 5C View FIGURE 5 )............................................ pusaq sp. nov.
-. Antennal band with articles evenly coloured................................................................ 7
7. Lower face orbits light yellow ( Figs 2 View FIGURE 2 B–C); metathoracic tibia evenly black ( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 )...................... huk sp. nov.
-. Lower face evenly black; metathoracic tibia reddish yellow, at most basally and distally brownish ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 )... qanchis sp. nov.
8. Fore wing weakly infuscate, with a more darkly infumate patches centrally and apically ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 A–B)......... soqta sp. nov.
-. Fore wing hyaline..................................................................................... 9
9. Female with metathoracic coxa reddish ( Fig. 1A and 1D View FIGURE 1 ); male with metapleuron black with a whitish cream spot ( Fig. 1B View FIGURE 1 )................................................................................... attenboroughi sp. nov.
-. Female with metathoracic coxa black ( Fig. 8A View FIGURE 8 ); male with metapleuron reddish with a whitish cream spot ( Fig. 8B View FIGURE 8 )................................................................................................. tawa sp. nov.
FIGURE 1. Details of Mnioes attenboroughi sp. nov. (paratype) A. Lateral habitus of female (scale bar = 1 mm), B. Lateral habitus of male (scale bar = 1 mm) C. Facial view of female D. Propodeum and first two metasomal tergites of female.
FIGURE 2. Details of Mnioes huk sp. nov. (holotype). A. Lateral habitus of female (scale bar = 1 mm) B. Frontal view of head C. Latero-frontal view of head D. Ventro-dorsal view of propodeum.
FIGURE 3. Details of Mnioes iskay sp. nov. (holotype). A. Lateral habitus of female (scale bar = 1 mm) B. Dorsal view of propodeum C. Dorsal view of metasomal tergites I–II.
FIGURE 4. Details of Mnioes poncei sp. nov. and Mnioes kinsa sp. nov. A–B Mnioes poncei sp. nov. (holotype) A. Lateral habitus of female (scale bar = 1 mm) B. Lateral view of head C. Mnioes kinsa sp. nov. (holotype), lateral habitus of female (scale bar = 1 mm).
FIGURE 5. Details of Mnioes pisqa sp. nov. and M. pusaq sp. nov. A–B Mnioes pisqa sp. nov. (holotype) A. Lateral habitus of female (scale bar = 1 mm) B. Lateral view of head C. Mnioes pusaq sp. nov. (holotype), lateral habitus of female (scale bar = 1 mm).
FIGURE 6. Details of Mnioes qanchis sp. nov. (holotype). Habitus in lateral view (scale bar = 1 mm).
FIGURE 7. Details of Mnioes soqta sp. nov. (paratype) A. Habitus in lateral view of female B. Habitus in lateral view of male (scale bars = 1 mm).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |