Metioche Stål, 1877
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4564.2.13 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6EC52864-8982-470A-84E7-A317518F7DD9 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5944262 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E687FC-FFBA-FFD7-BDFB-EA43FEC4F888 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Metioche Stål, 1877 |
status |
|
Metioche Stål, 1877 View in CoL
Trigonidium (Metioche) View in CoL : Stål, 1877: 48; Gorochov, 1987: 10; Otte, 1994: 46; Sugimoto, 2001: 81 –87.
Metioche: Kirby, 1906: 78 View in CoL ; Chopard, 1951: 467; Chopard, 1968: 331; Chopard, 1969: 295; Yin & Liu, 1995: 185; Storozhenko & Paik, 2007: 111; Kim, 2013: 75.
Trigonidium: Ichikawa, 2001: 45 View in CoL –58
The literature treated Metioche View in CoL vastly different, either as a distinct genus or a subgenus of Trigonidium View in CoL , and there seems to be no explanation in most literature on the status of this taxon.
The type species Trigonidium cicindeloides is very similar to Metioche Stål, 1877 in that the tympana on fore tibia is generally absent (but not always in Metioche ), the tegmen is not pubescent but differs by exhibiting a range of yellow and black colouration among the congeners (instead of mostly black). The absence of metanotal glands in males, and tegmen rounded in lateral view (not always) (instead of flat) are also characters. Trigonidium also differs from Metioche in the male genitalia ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). Until a molecular phylogeny can reveal the phylogenetic relationships of Trigonidium and Metioche , we consider these taxa as separate genera, despite the similarities mentioned above, owing to Metioche lacking in the diagnostic characters of Trigonidium : i.e., distal epiphallic lobes small and immovable in relation to the rest of the epiphallus, rachis with apical spine-like lobule.
There are currently 41 species: 1 from Atlantic Oceanic Islands, 7 Australia and New Guinea, 1 Bolivia, 1 Borneo, 1 China, 2 India, 4 Indian Oceanic Islands, 2 Japan, 2 Java, 4 Madagascar, 1 Malay Peninsula, 3 Pacific Oceanic Islands, 1 Peru, 1 Philippines, 1 Taiwan, 3 central Africa, 3 eastern Africa, and 4 western Africa. It is likely that most species need closer examination to verify their generic statuses and it is likely that Metioche is currently not monophyletic. Metioche (Metioche) pallipes (Stål, 1861) is synoptic with Trigonidium cicindeloides in the former’s type locality, Singapore (Tan, 2012) ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). Specifically, the two species co-occur in the grassy areas of Bidadari which is currently cleared for housing development.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Metioche Stål, 1877
Tan, Ming Kai, Baroga-Barbecho, Jessica B. & Yap, Sheryl A. 2019 |
Trigonidium: Ichikawa, 2001 : 45
Ichikawa, A. 2001: 45 |
Metioche: Kirby, 1906 : 78
Kim, T. W. 2013: 75 |
Storozhenko, S. Y. & Paik, J. C. 2007: 111 |
Yin, H. S. & Liu, X. W. 1995: 185 |
Chopard, L. 1969: 295 |
Chopard, L. 1968: 331 |
Chopard, L. 1951: 467 |
Kirby, W. F. 1906: 78 |
Trigonidium (Metioche)
Sugimoto, M. 2001: 81 |
Otte, D. 1994: 46 |
Gorochov, A. V. 1987: 10 |
Stal, C. 1877: 48 |