Forcipomyia (Trichohelea) limnetis Ingram and Macfie, 1931

Marino, Pablo I. & Spinelli, Gustavo R., 2004, Descriptions of the Patagonian species of the subgenus Trichohelea of Forcipomyia, with a key to the Neotropical species (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae), Journal of Natural History 38 (17), pp. 2251-2262 : 2254-2257

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222930310001618895

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DF2D33-AB47-FFB1-FE89-25CDFCBDE24E

treatment provided by

Carolina

scientific name

Forcipomyia (Trichohelea) limnetis Ingram and Macfie, 1931
status

 

Forcipomyia (Trichohelea) limnetis Ingram and Macfie, 1931 View in CoL

( figures 1–9 View FIGS )

Forcipomyia (Apelma) limnetis Ingram and Macfie, 1931: 169 View in CoL (male; Argentina).

Forcipomyia (Trichohelea) limnetis: Wirth, 1974: 12 View in CoL (in catalogue to Neotropical species; subgeneric position); Spinelli and Wirth, 1993: 27 (in list of Argentinean species); Borkent and Wirth, 1997: 49 (in catalogue to world species); Borkent and Spinelli, 2000: 23 (in catalogue to Neotropical species).

Forcipomyia limnetis: Spinelli, 1998: 325 View in CoL (in list of Argentinean species).

Lasiohelea shannoni Ingram and Macfie, 1931: 171 View in CoL ( Lasiohelea View in CoL ; female; Argentina). New synonymy.

Forcipomyia (Trichohelea) shannoni: Wirth, 1974: 12 View in CoL (in catalogue to Neotropical species; comb.); Spinelli and Wirth, 1993: 27 (in list of Argentinean species); Borkent and Wirth, 1997: 50 (in catalogue to World species); Borkent and Spinelli, 2000: 23 (in catalogue to Neotropical species).

Forcipomyia shannoni: Spinelli, 1998: 325 View in CoL (in list of Argentinean species).

Diagnosis

A medium-sized, brown species; flagellomeres 1–8 distinctly broader than long; third segment of maxillary palpi swollen, sensory pit deep opening by a small pore; CR 0.55; tarsal claws equal, small, bifid at extreme apex; female genital sclerotization open, subquadrangular; two pyriform spermathecae; aedeagus stout, basal arch extending to half of total length; parameres inverted U-shaped, lateral arms strongly divergent.

Female

Wing. Length 1.23 mm (1.08–1.34, N ~4); breadth 0.56 mm (0.50–0.60, N ~4).

Head. Dark brown. Vertex pilose. Eyes bare, contiguous by a distance equal to diameter of three ommatidia. Flagellum of antenna ( figure 1 View FIGS ) with flagellomeres 1–8 distinctly broader than long; 9–12 elongated, cylindrical, approximately 2.3 times longer than greatest breadth; distal flagellomere slightly longer than 9–12; AR 1.69 (1.54–1.82, N ~4). Palpus ( figure 2 View FIGS ) with third segment nearly as long as the combined length of fourth and fifth segments, with deep sensory pit opening by a small rounded pore; PR 1.91 (1.75–2.06, N ~4). Mandible ( figure 3 View FIGS ) abruptly tapering to pointed apex, armed with 10 very small teeth. Maxilla ( figure 4 View FIGS ) straight, tapering to pointed tip, with six pairs of minute teeth.

Thorax. Scutum dark brown, with narrow pale longitudinal admedian stripes, prescutellar area paler; scutellum pale brown, with approximately 20 strong setae and 15 slender ones. Legs brown, densely covered by hairs; prothoracic TR 2.02 (1.93–2.07, N ~4), mesothoracic TR 1.98 (1.93–2.00, N ~4), metathoracic TR 2.02 (1.92–2.12, N ~4). Claws ( figure 5 View FIGS ) short, stout and curved, bifid at extreme apex; empodium well developed. Wing ( figure 6 View FIGS ) densely covered with dark macrotrichia, more abundant on anterior margin; a small pale area situated immediately distad to the second radial cell; first radial cell almost obliterated, second radial cell well developed; CR 0.55 (0.52–0.57, N ~4). Halter whitish.

Abdomen. Pale brown. Genital sclerotization ( figure 7 View FIGS ) open, subquadrangular. Two well-sclerotized, pyriform spermathecae ( figure 8 View FIGS ), subequal, measuring 0.056× 0.046 mm and 0.050× 0.042 mm, necks 0.004 mm.

Male

Similar to female with the usual sexual differences. Hind tarsal ratio 1.70.

Genitalia. Sternite 9 aproximately half as long as broad, with broad caudomedian excavation; tergite 9 short, with conspicuous, hairy apicolateral processes; sternite 10 spiculate anteriorly. Gonocoxite narrow, three times longer than broad; gonostylus nearly straight, slender, as long as gonocoxite. Aedeagus ( figure 9 View FIGS ) triangular, stout with rounded blunt tip; basal arms slender, strongly sclerotized; basal arch extending to half of total length; distal portion lightly sclerotized. Parameres highly sclerotized, inverted U-shaped, lateral arms strongly divergent.

Distribution

In subantarctic forest of northern Patagonia (Neuquen and Río Negro provinces in Argentina, Osorno in Chile) ( figure 24 View FIG ).

Types

Holotype „ of Forcipomyia limnetis (slide in Canada balsam), holotype ” of Lasiohelea shannoni (pinned), Argentina, Río Negro Prov., Lake Correntoso , 18–25 November 1926, F. and M. Edwards. In the Natural History Museum, London (both examined during the present study).

Other specimens examined

Argentina, Río Negro Prov., Lake Correntoso , 1”, 18–25 November 1926, F. and M. Edwards (paratype of L. shannoni , slide in Canada balsam in the Natural History Museum, London) ; Neuquen Prov. Stream Pedregoso and provincial route No. 67 (5 km W of El Portezuelo), 3 February 1986, G. Spinelli, 1”; Río Negro Prov., ‘Nahuel Huapi’ National Park, Stream Chall-Huaco, 26 January 1988, G. Spinelli, 1”; ‘ Nahuel Huapi’ National Park, Lake Guillelmo , 24 February 1994, G. Spinelli, 1 ”. Chile, Osorno, Pucatrihue , 1 December 1992, G. Spinelli, 1” .

Discussion

The study of the types of Lasiohelea shannoni (female) and Forcipomyia limnetis (male), both with identical collecting data, reveals that their differences obey two usual sexual differences within species of the subgenus Forcipomyia (Trichohelea) , representing thus, the two sexes of a single species.

The original description and illustrations of F. limnetis are very accurate except for the aedeagus, which shows lower basal arch and broader apex. Ingram and Macfie (1931) report a metathoracic TR ‘about 2.4’ for L. shannoni . Perhaps they measured this feature from the slide-mounted paratype, which shows the second

tarsomere of the hind leg somewhat folded, being the measure most probably overestimated. On the other hand, the pinned holotype is in excellent condition, and shows a metathoracic TR only slightly longer than 2.00.

Females of this species are barely distinguishable from those of F. (T.) tehuelche sp. n. The males, however, differ by the following genital characters: caudomedian excavation of sternite 9 broad (narrow in tehuelche ), aedeagus with basal arch extending to one-half of total length and without distal process (extending to onetenth of total length, with a distinctive distal process in tehuelche ), and lateral arms of parameres strongly divergent (subparallel in tehuelche ).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Ceratopogonidae

Genus

Forcipomyia

Loc

Forcipomyia (Trichohelea) limnetis Ingram and Macfie, 1931

Marino, Pablo I. & Spinelli, Gustavo R. 2004
2004
Loc

Forcipomyia limnetis:

SPINELLI, G. R. 1998: 325
1998
Loc

Forcipomyia shannoni:

SPINELLI, G. R. 1998: 325
1998
Loc

Forcipomyia (Trichohelea) limnetis:

BORKENT, A. & SPINELLI, G. R. 2000: 23
BORKENT, A. & WIRTH, W. W. 1997: 49
SPINELLI, G. R. & WIRTH, W. W. 1993: 27
WIRTH, W. W. 1974: 12
1974
Loc

Forcipomyia (Trichohelea) shannoni:

BORKENT, A. & SPINELLI, G. R. 2000: 23
BORKENT, A. & WIRTH, W. W. 1997: 50
SPINELLI, G. R. & WIRTH, W. W. 1993: 27
WIRTH, W. W. 1974: 12
1974
Loc

Forcipomyia (Apelma) limnetis

INGRAM, A. & MACFIE, J. W. S. 1931: 169
1931
Loc

Lasiohelea shannoni

INGRAM, A. & MACFIE, J. W. S. 1931: 171
1931
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF