Rubus, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.515.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8066940 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DE3646-FF86-FFD4-FF43-F983FC71F80F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2023-06-20 17:40:20, last updated 2023-11-09 11:05:50) |
scientific name |
Rubus |
status |
stat. nov. |
Subsection Afroidaei (Focke) A.Beek stat. nov.
Basionym:— Rubus ser. Afroidaei Focke (1911: 171 , 172) in Bibliotheca Botanica 17, Heft 72 (2).
Type (designated here): — Rubus kingaensis Engler (1902: 313) View in CoL .
Calyx divided (almost) to base.
Note: —The series of African Rubus described by Focke (1911) cover a wide range of species, without a clear identity. It is better to use the rank of series for natural, well defined groups of species, and the wider groups as subsections. The presentation of infrageneric taxa in this paper results from this consideration.
Engler, A. (1902) Beitrage zur Flora von Afrika 22. In: A. Engler (ed.), Botanische Jahrbucher fur Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 30. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, pp. 239 - 445. [https: // www. biodiversitylibrary. org / item / 137005 # page / 255 / mode / 1 up]
Focke, W. O. (1911) Species ruborum. Monographiae generis Rubi prodromus, Pars I et II. Bibliotheca Botanica 72: 1 - 223. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 15533
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Rubus
Beek, Abraham Van De 2021 |
Rubus ser. Afroidaei
Focke, W. O. 1911: 171 |
Rubus kingaensis
Engler, A. 1902: ) |