Laboulbenia Mont. & C.P.Robin

Santamaria, Sergi & Pedersen, Jan, 2021, Laboulbeniomycetes (Fungi, Ascomycota) of Denmark, European Journal of Taxonomy 781, pp. 1-425 : 120-126

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2021.781.1583

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5829624

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D3878A-B726-FF99-677B-7C3BD907FBC5

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Laboulbenia Mont. & C.P.Robin
status

 

Genus Laboulbenia Mont. & C.P.Robin View in CoL View at ENA

MB#2606

Histoire naturelle des végétaux parasites qui croissent sur l’homme et sur les animaux vivants. J.B.Baillière, Paris: 622 ( Robin 1853). –

Type species: L. rougetii Mont. & C.P.Robin View in CoL

Thaxteria Giard, Comptes-Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances et Mémoires de la Société de Biologie View in CoL et de ses filiales, Paris: 156 ( Giard 1892) [MB#5406]

Ceraiomyces Thaxt., Proceedings View in CoL of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 36: 410 ( Thaxter 1901a) [MB#878]

Eumisgomyces Speg., Anales View in CoL del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires 23: 176 ( Spegazzini 1912) [MB#1927]

Laboulbeniella Speg., Anales View in CoL del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires 23: 188 ( Spegazzini 1912) [MB#2608]

Schizolaboulbenia Middelh., Fungus View in CoL 27 (1–4): 73 ( Middelhoek 1957) [MB#4896]

Scalenomyces I.I.Tav., Mycologia Memoirs View in CoL 9: 313 ( Tavares 1985) [MB#25698]

Brief description

Mostly monoecious. Receptacle typically five-celled. The two-celled pedicel (primary or lower receptacle) consists of superposed cells I and II. Cell II supports on one side the perithecial stalk cell (VI) and the perithecium with associated cells, and on the opposite side the secondary or upper receptacle with appendages. The secondary receptacle is typically three-celled, including cell III underlying ± parallel cells IV and V, separated from each other by a septum joining or not the insertion cell with cell III. The appendages (i.e., the primary appendage) are subtended by a flattened and usually darkened insertion cell. Appendages are typically arranged in two sets: the inner appendage including simple antheridia, and the outer appendage. The solitary perithecium, above the basal cells (m, n, n’ and VII), has an outer wall with 4 unequal cells for each vertical row, with an ostiole surrounded by two ± prominent lips and two preostiolar blackened spots.

Remarks

Of all the genera included in the Laboulbeniales , this is the richest in number of taxa, with more than 650 species, in addition to countless infraspecific taxa of highly variable value. We have gathered 653 species in our database catalogue. Song et al. (2019) mentioned 633 species where 40 have been described after 2010, Haelewaters et al. (2019b) reported 650 accepted species and many varieties, and according to the same authors, Index Fungorum (2019) includes 897 names of taxa. More than one hundred species are known in Europe (we count 109 species), 47 have been found in Denmark. The most recently described species are L. chionophila , L. halophila ( Santamaria et al. 2020a) , L. quarantenae ( Haelewaters & De Kesel 2020) , L. angkorensis , L. fusca , L. polyandra , L. scabra , and L. trilobata ( Kong et al. 2020) , and L. amblystomi ( Haelewaters et al. 2021) .

Although species of Laboulbenia mostly occurs on ground beetles ( Carabidae ), some may also be found on other families like Staphylinidae , Gyrinidae , Chrysomelidae , Elateridae , and Corylophidae , even on other orders of Insecta like Diptera , Blattodea , Hemiptera , Hymenoptera, Orthoptera , and unrelated arthropods like mites (Acarina).

A subdivision of the genus into subgenera would be desirable, although the difficulty of managing so many taxa, data and intraspecific variability makes it a titanic task. Some attempts were carried out by Spegazzini (1917), who described several unnatural sections, which were not widely followed by subsequent authors. Unfortunately, his contemporary Roland Thaxter passed away before his sixth monograph dealing with this genus could see the light. This fact led to many new species left out but also a probable reorganization of the genus. Many years after, Tavares (1985) distinguished 20 structural groups of species based on morphology but subgenera were not formally described.

Some characteristics are key to distinguish and group species: (1) if the septum IV–V is connected with the septum III–IV, as in L. pedicellata , or not as in L. flagellata ; (2) if the insertion cell is flattened and dark, clearly distinguished from surrounding cells, as in L. ophoni , or pale, colourless, not distinctly contrasting from the surrounding cells, as in L. fasciculata ; (3) whether basal cells of the outer appendage show some septa distinctly darkened and/or constricted, as in L. clivinalis ; (4) if the outer appendage is unbranched, as in L. notiophili , or ± ramified, as in L. elaphri ; (5) if cell V is totally or partially free from the perithecium, as in L. pseudomasei , or connected along its whole length to the perithecium, as in L. vulgaris . Other important features, such as the cells III, IV and V totally or partially undivided, are not found in the Danish species of Laboulbenia .

Key to the Danish species (partially following Majewski 1994 b, and Santamaria 1998)

The included key for identification of Danish species in the genus Laboulbenia is broadly based on the mentioned key characteristics. Although it appears to be obvious, it should be noted that some features may be very variable, and because of this we should rely on collections with specimens in good condition and reasonably abundant. Otherwise, if we have to take into account all variations, many of them product of malformations by injury, the key would become useless and unwieldy.

1. Perithecium bearing some kind of apical outgrowths....................................................................... 2

– Perithecium without apical outgrowths ............................................................................................ 4

2. Two apical outgrowths on the perithecium; the anterior short, arcuate, the posterior longer, straight but hooked on the top. On Gyrinus Geoffroy, 1762 View in CoL and allied genera (Col. Gyrinidae View in CoL )..................... ............................................................................................................................. L. gyrinicola Speg. View in CoL

– Only one solitary outgrowth. On other hosts.................................................................................... 3

3. Outgrowth subapical, horn-like, darkened (may be very short!). Insertion cell not evident, reduced to a groove. Septum IV–V connected with septum III–IV. On the distal part of elytra of Bembidion View in CoL subgenus Notaphus Dejean, 1821 (Col. Carabidae View in CoL ) ............................................... L. cornuta Thaxt. View in CoL

– Outgrowth apical, horn-like, pale. Insertion cell flattened, darkened, and clearly distinguished from surrounding cells. Septum IV–V not connected with septum III–IV. Grows hidden near the pygidium in Dromius View in CoL (Col. Carabidae View in CoL ).......................................................................... L. hyalopoda De Kesel View in CoL

4. Insertion cell colourless, not darkened, or not distinctly contrasting with surrounding cells, or absent, sometimes reduced to a groove......................................................................................................... 5

– Insertion cell flattened, darkened, clearly distinguished from surrounding cells ........................... 12

5. Receptacle four-celled, because cells III and IV are not separated. On Sphaerius acaroides (Col. Sphaeriusidae View in CoL ). .................................................................................................... L. sphaerii Santam. View in CoL

– Receptacle five-celled as usual. On other hosts. .............................................................................. 6

6. Cell V divided, proliferating into up to eight cells gradually decreasing in size, each giving rise to secondary appendages. On Chlaenius Bonelli, 1810 View in CoL and allied genera (Col. Carabidae View in CoL ).... L. fasciculata Peyr. View in CoL

– Cell V not divided............................................................................................................................. 7

7. Septum IV–V not connected with septum III–IV. Cell V shorter than cell IV. Receptacle distinctly constricted between cells II and III/IV. On Bembidion Latreille, 1802 View in CoL (Col. Carabidae View in CoL )....................................................................................................... L. murmanica Huldén View in CoL

– Septum IV–V connected with septum III–IV. Cell V as long as cell IV .......................................... 8

8. Primary appendage compact, without distinction between outer and inner appendages. On Cafius Stephens, 1829 View in CoL and allied genera (Col. Staphylinidae View in CoL Staphylininae View in CoL ) ......................... L. cafii Thaxt. View in CoL

– Primary appendage separated into the two characteristic sets, i.e., the inner and outer appendages, each with respective basal cells (sometimes young thalli need to be studied; overmature or old thalli may have deteriorated appendages where this feature is difficult to see)......................................... 9

9. Perithecium free, measuring more than the half of the total length of the thallus. Primary septum or insertion cell located below the lowermost perithecial outer wall cells (w 1). On legs, typically on tarsi of Bembidion View in CoL (Col. Carabidae View in CoL ) ............................................................................... L. curtipes Thaxt. View in CoL

– Perithecium not free, shorter. Primary septum above w 1 cells ....................................................... 10

10. Cell IV longer than cell III. On Bembidion View in CoL (Col. Carabidae View in CoL )................................ L. luxurians Peyr. View in CoL

– Cell III longer than cell IV............................................................................................................... 11

11. Perithecial apex rounded, symmetric, with undistinguished lips. Preostiolar spots undefined but replaced with a subapical dark suffusion. On Cillenus lateralis View in CoL (Col. Carabidae View in CoL ).............................. ..................................................................................................................... L. lichtensteinii F.Picard

– Perithecial apex acute, asymmetric, with distinct lips. Preostiolar spots absent. On Bledius View in CoL (Col. Staphylinidae View in CoL Oxytelinae ) ............................................................................... L. parriaudii Balazuc View in CoL

12. Septum IV–V connected with septum III–IV................................................................................. 13

– Septum IV–V not connected with septum III–IV........................................................................... 22

13. Outer appendage unbranched, exceeding in length the perithecial apex........................................ 14

– Outer appendage branched or, if unusually simple, then short, not exceeding the perithecial apex, or hardly discernible from inner appendage ....................................................................................... 15

14. Appendages bent towards perithecium. Dorsal margin of perithecium straight, ventral margin curved. Cell V very narrow. On the prothorax margin of Pterostichus View in CoL subgenus Argutor Dejean, 1821 View in CoL (Col. Carabidae View in CoL )......................................................................................................... L. kajanensis Huldén View in CoL

– Outer appendage straight to flexuous, never bent towards perithecium. Outer and inner margins of perithecium curved. Cell V as broad as cell IV. On Olisthopus Dejean, 1828 View in CoL (Col. Carabidae View in CoL )............................................................................................................... L. olisthopi Speg.

15. Appendages with the 2–3 lower cells inflated and separated by thick and dark septa. Cell I showing a blackish lateral swelling above the foot. On Philonthus View in CoL and allied genera (Col. Staphylinidae View in CoL Staphylininae View in CoL )....................................................................................................... L. philonthi Thaxt. View in CoL

– Otherwise........................................................................................................................................ 16

16. Some dorsal septa above the basal cell of outer appendage distinctly blackened and constricted...... ........................................................................................................................................................ 17

– Not such septa above the basal cell of outer appendage. Thalli very pale, yellowish brown, with the two preostiolar spots of the perithecium merged into a contrasting black ring. On Ophonus Dejean, 1821 View in CoL and allied genera (Col. Carabidae View in CoL ) ................................................................. L. ophoni Thaxt. View in CoL

17. Insertion cell free, separated from perithecial wall. On Clivina Latreille, 1802 (Col. Carabidae View in CoL )............................................................................................................. L. clivinalis Thaxt. View in CoL

– Insertion cell or cell V connected along its whole length to the perithecium................................. 18

18. Outer appendage consisting of 2–3 straight, long branches, arising from the suprabasal cell which bears an additional dark reddish-brown branch. On Paederus Fabricius, 1775 View in CoL and relatives (Col. Staphylinidae View in CoL Paederinae View in CoL ) ...................................................................................... L. cristata Thaxt. View in CoL

– Different.......................................................................................................................................... 19

19. Perithecium showing 1–3 swellings or protuberances on its lower third or broadest part (septa between w 1 and w 2). On Col. Carabidae View in CoL Tachyina like Tachys Dejean, 1821 View in CoL and allied genera ....................... ..................................................................................................................................... L. egens Speg. View in CoL

– Perithecium without such protuberances ........................................................................................ 20

20. Cell II with parallel margins, somewhat constricted towards the upper part. Thallus olive brown, with darker to almost hyaline areas. Outer appendage having the septa between the basal and suprabasal cells and between this and next outer cell thickened, black and constricted. On Bembidion View in CoL and Dyschirius View in CoL (Col. Carabidae View in CoL ) .............................................................................. L. pedicellata Thaxt. View in CoL

– Cell II with divergent margins, not constricted upwards. Thallus almost uniform yellowish-amber. Outer appendage only with the septum between the basal cell and the posterior branch thickened, black and constricted. On other hosts ............................................................................................. 21

21. Outer appendage basal cell bulging outwards, as long or longer than cell IV. Receptacle bent outwards. On Cafius View in CoL (Col. Staphylinidae View in CoL Staphylininae View in CoL )................................ L. littoralis De Kesel & Haelew. View in CoL

– Outer appendage basal cell slightly inflated outwards, shorter than cell IV. Dorsal side of receptacle straight to slightly concave. On Pogonus Dejean, 1821 View in CoL (Col. Carabidae View in CoL ) .......................................... ........................................................................................................ L. slackensis Cépède & F.Picard View in CoL

22. Outer appendage unbranched (rarely branched from 3 rd cell or above if injured).......................... 23

– Outer appendage branched (usually from basal or suprabasal cells of appendage) ....................... 41

23. Dioecious. A seven-celled male thallus is paired to a female thallus, attached by the blackened feet. The terminal cell functions as an antheridium. The three distal septa darkened and constricted. Typically on Acupalpus View in CoL (Col. Carabidae View in CoL )................................................................. L. inflata Thaxt. View in CoL

– Monoecious. If some reduced thalli paired to females are present, characteristics are different (see L. lecoareri View in CoL ) .................................................................................................................................... 24

24. Cell V totally or partially free from perithecium, or insertion cell separated from perithecial wall ... ........................................................................................................................................................ 25

– Cell V and insertion cell attached to perithecial wall ..................................................................... 27

25. Inner appendage absent. On Trechoblemus micros View in CoL (Col. Carabidae View in CoL ).................................................. ............................................................................................................. L. lecoareri (Balazuc) Huldén View in CoL

– Inner appendage present ................................................................................................................. 26

26. Inner appendage consisting of a small basal cell supporting two unbranched or once ramified branches bearing pairs or clusters of antheridia; sometimes with elongated sterile branches. On Amara Bonelli, 1810 View in CoL (Col. Carabidae View in CoL ).............................................................................. L. aubryi Balazuc View in CoL

– Inner appendage consisting of a small basal cell supporting two once ramified branches (rarely a 3 rd branch may be present), in total four branches (or six if 3 rd branch is present). Each branch gives rise to a simple three-celled appendage where the terminal cell is an antheridium bearing a long and asymmetric neck. On or near the pygidium of Syntomus View in CoL (Col. Carabidae View in CoL ) ........... L. pygidicola Santam. View in CoL sp. nov.

27. Inner appendage with long branches supporting lateral paired or solitary brownish antheridia near the base. On Leistus Frölich, 1799 View in CoL (Col. Carabidae View in CoL )................... L. leisti J.Siemaszko & Siemaszko View in CoL

– Inner appendage with short branches not exceeding the perithecial apex...................................... 28

28. Thallus small, total length from foot to perithecial apex less than 100 µm. On Corylophus cassidoides (Col. Corylophidae View in CoL ) ....................................................................................... L. corylophi Scheloske

– Thallus longer, more than 100 µm from foot to perithecial apex (not considering growth forms found on tarsi or antennae of hosts) .......................................................................................................... 29

29. Appendages bent towards perithecium. Dorsal margin of perithecium straight, ventral margin curved. Cell V very narrow. On the prothorax margin of Pterostichus View in CoL subgenus Argutor View in CoL (Col. Carabidae View in CoL )......................................................................................................... L. kajanensis Huldén View in CoL

– Otherwise........................................................................................................................................ 30

30. Inner appendage unbranched, consisting of a basal cell, a suprabasal cell and a solitary terminal large antheridium. On Asaphidion Des Gozis, 1886 View in CoL (Col. Carabidae View in CoL )........ L. thaxteri Cépède & F.Picard View in CoL

– Inner appendage different, bearing more antheridia ....................................................................... 31

31. Stalk cell of the perithecium (cell VI) broader than long, flattened (see also L. stilicicola and L. vulgaris View in CoL )...................................................................................................................................... 32

– Stalk cell of the perithecium (cell VI) longer than broad, or isodiametric ..................................... 34

32. Basal and suprabasal cells of the outer appendage (rarely also the 3 rd cell) elongated, hyaline, narrow, contrasting with darker and broader cells above. Inner appendage consisting of 2(–3) cells bearing 2–3 antheridia. On Acupalpus View in CoL (Col. Carabidae View in CoL )............................... L. inexpectata Santam. View in CoL sp. nov.

– Other characteristics ....................................................................................................................... 33

33. Perithecium broad (more than 45 µm in width), half free, with the tip pointing towards the ventral margin. On Badister View in CoL (Col. Carabidae View in CoL ).......................................... L. benjaminii Balazuc ex Santam. View in CoL

– Perithecium narrow (less than 45 µm in width), about ¾ or more free, with straight tip. On Col. Carabidae View in CoL of the genera Notiophilus Duméril, 1806 View in CoL , Cymindis Latreille, 1806 View in CoL , Demetrias Bonelli, 1810 View in CoL , Dromius View in CoL , Philorhizus Hope, 1838 View in CoL , Metadromius Bedel, 1907 View in CoL , etc. .......................................... ............................................................................................................ L. notiophili Cépède & Picard View in CoL

34. Outer appendage with the basal cell forming a distinctive blunt outgrowth on its outer side. Cell II and upper part of cell I tuberculate. On Perigona nigriceps View in CoL (Col. Carabidae View in CoL ).................................... ...................................................................................................................... L. manubriolata Thaxt.

– Otherwise........................................................................................................................................ 35

35. Cell II with delicately undulate and punctate margins. Inner appendage consisting of two short branches above the basal cell, each bearing a solitary lateral antheridium. On Porotachys Netolitzky, 1914 View in CoL (Col. Carabidae View in CoL ).............................................................................................. L. picardii Maire

– With other characters ...................................................................................................................... 36

36. Inner appendage embracing the perithecium; consisting of two branches directly arising from the basal cell; each branch with 5–6 superposed cells, each giving rise to unilaterally, simple two or three-celled branches terminated by long and narrow antheridia. Cell VII protruding below the perithecium. On Syntomus View in CoL (Col. Carabidae View in CoL ) ............................................................................. L. metableti Scheloske

– Inner appendage and cell VII not as above..................................................................................... 37

37. Receptacle distinctly constricted between cells II and III–VI. Cell II inflated and broader halfway up. Outer appendage not exceeding the perithecial apex, with the basal cell separated from cells above by a fairly darkened septum. On Bembidion View in CoL (Col. Carabidae View in CoL )....................... L. murmanica Huldén View in CoL

– Not all the previous features showing at the same time ................................................................. 38

38. Cell I only a little shorter than cell II, which usually broadens distally. On Col. Carabidae View in CoL .......... 39

– Cell I much shorter than cell II, which is cylindrical, with parallel margins. On Rugilus Leach, 1819 View in CoL (Col. Staphylinidae View in CoL Paederinae View in CoL ) ........................................................................... L. stilicicola Speg.

39. Anterior margin of perithecium with a protrusion at middle height (at the level of the septum separating w 1 an w 2 tiers of perithecial outer wall cells). Perithecial apex strongly asymmetric, truncated, with flattened anterior lips. On Bradycellus Erichson, 1837 View in CoL and Trichocellus Ganglbauer, 1892 (Col. Carabidae View in CoL )...................................................................................................... L. eubradycelli Huldén View in CoL

– Otherwise........................................................................................................................................ 40

40. On Pterostichus View in CoL and allied genera (Col. Carabidae View in CoL )......................... L. argutoris Cépède & F.Picard View in CoL

– On Calathus Bonelli, 1810 View in CoL (Col. Carabidae View in CoL )................................................... L. calathi T.Majewski

– On Bembidion View in CoL and Trechus View in CoL (Col. Carabidae View in CoL ) ........................................................... L. vulgaris Peyr. View in CoL

41. Insertion cell free from perithecium ............................................................................................... 42

– Insertion cell attached to perithecium............................................................................................. 43

42. Cell V dividing and proliferating into a branch of variable length, which may support antheridia. Typically on Pterostichus View in CoL subgenus Melanius Bonelli, 1809 (Col. Carabidae View in CoL ) .................................. ........................................................................................................................ L. pseudomasei Thaxt.

– Cell V undivided and not proliferating. Typically on Diachromus Erichson, 1837 View in CoL (Col. Carabidae View in CoL )........................................................................................................... L. melanaria Thaxt.

43. Outer appendage ramified directly above the basal cell; consisting of several slender branches, dark brown towards the basal dorsal side. Inner appendage similar to the outer. Solitary antheridia on the lower parts of inner appendage branches. Perithecial preostiolar spots black and contrasting with the pale amber-brown remainder thallus. On Dicheirotrichus Jacquelin du Val, 1857 View in CoL (Col. Carabidae View in CoL )............................................................................................. L. giardii Cépède & F.Picard

– Outer appendage once ramified above the suprabasal cell; if ramified from the basal cell, then remaining characteristics different from above .............................................................................. 44

44. Outer appendage short, slender, not exceeding perithecial apex. On Bembidion View in CoL (Col. Carabidae View in CoL )....................................................................................................... L. murmanica Huldén View in CoL

– Outer appendage thick and long, exceeding perithecial apex......................................................... 45

45. Perithecium with a ventral prominence formed by the intersection of outer wall cell tiers w 1 and w 2. Mostly on Acupalpus View in CoL in a broad sense (including Stenolophus Dejean, 1821 View in CoL ) (Col. Carabidae View in CoL ) ....... ............................................................................................................................. L. stenolophi Speg. View in CoL

– Perithecium without such prominence. On other hosts. ................................................................ 46

46. Insertion cell attached above the middle height of the posterior margin of the perithecial wall. Typically on Paranchus Lindroth, 1974 View in CoL , but also on others Col. Carabidae View in CoL Pterostichinae View in CoL ............................... .......................................................................................................................... L. collae T.Majewski

– Insertion cell attached below the middle height of the perithecial wall ......................................... 47

47. Perithecium with a nearly straight anterior margin, a cylindrical and prominent apex, and the preostiolar spots blackish and confluent into a ring-like area. Antheridia solitary, sessile, lateral to branches of the inner appendage. On Col. Carabidae View in CoL Harpalinae View in CoL like Harpalus Latreille, 1802 View in CoL , Ophonus View in CoL and Anisodactylus Dejean, 1829 View in CoL .......................................................................... L. coneglianensis Speg.

– With other characteristics ............................................................................................................... 48

48. Inner appendage forming short branchlets terminating in antheridia. Sterile branchlets, if any, not exceeding the perithecial apex. Thalli very pale yellowish brown, with the perithecial blackened preostiolar spots and insertion cell strongly contrasting. Typically on Ophonus View in CoL and Harpalus View in CoL , but also on other ground beetles .................................................................................... L. ophoni Thaxt. View in CoL

– Inner appendage with some long sterile branches exceeding perithecial apex. Thalli differently coloured .......................................................................................................................................... 49

49. Outer appendage dividing above the suprabasal cell into two subequal, strongly divergent branches. Perithecium asymmetric, with the ventral side distinctly more convex than the dorsal side. Perithecial tip large, with an almost flattened apex. On Elaphrus Fabricius, 1775 View in CoL (Col. Carabidae View in CoL ) ................... .................................................................................................................................. L. elaphri Speg. View in CoL

– Otherwise........................................................................................................................................ 50

50. Perithecium almost entirely free. On Oodes Bonelli, 1810 View in CoL (Col. Carabidae View in CoL ) .... L. oodiphila Huldén

– Perithecium not free. On other hosts .............................................................................................. 51

51. Thallus reddish coloured. Typically on Brachinus Weber, 1801 View in CoL (Col. Carabidae View in CoL ) ............................. ........................................................................................................... L. rougetii Mont. & C.P.Robin View in CoL

– Thallus not reddish coloured. On Col. Carabidae View in CoL Pterostichinae View in CoL ........................... L. flagellata Peyr. View in CoL

Kingdom

Fungi

Phylum

Ascomycota

Class

Laboulbeniomycetes

Order

Laboulbeniales

Family

Laboulbeniaceae

Loc

Laboulbenia Mont. & C.P.Robin

Santamaria, Sergi & Pedersen, Jan 2021
2021
Loc

Scalenomyces I.I.Tav., Mycologia Memoirs

I. I. Tav. 1985: 313
1985
Loc

Schizolaboulbenia Middelh., Fungus

Middelhoek 1957: 73
1957
Loc

Eumisgomyces Speg., Anales

Eumisgomyces Speg. 1912: 176
1912
Loc

Laboulbeniella Speg., Anales

Laboulbeniella Speg. 1912: 188
1912
Loc

Ceraiomyces Thaxt., Proceedings

Thaxter 1901: 410
1901
Loc

Thaxteria Giard, Comptes-Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances et Mémoires de la Société de Biologie

Giard 1892: 156
1892
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF