Protomicroplitis

Fernandez-Triana, J. L., 2015, A revision of the genus Protomicroplitis Ashmead (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae), with the description of a new species, Zootaxa 4039 (4), pp. 529-542 : 534-535

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4039.4.3

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5268A8C6-1214-46F5-97B4-716E96D71F7C

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6112802

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D2A112-DA65-FFDB-919A-F9DFFB2CFD68

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Protomicroplitis
status

 

GENUS Protomicroplitis View in CoL View at ENA

Protomicroplitis Ashmead, 1898: 167 View in CoL . Original description. No species included, no type species designation.

Protomicroplitis germani Ashmead 1900b: 132 . Nomen nudum. Invalid designation of type species. Incorrect original spelling of species name.

Protomicroplitis mediatus (Cresson, 1865) . Ashmead, 1900a: 292. Species included, no designation of type species.

Protomicroplitis mediatus (Cresson, 1865) . Viereck 1914: 124. Designation of type species (by monotypy).

Microgaster Latreille, 1804 View in CoL . Muesebeck 1922: 20. Status revised (synonymized under Microgaster View in CoL ).

Protomicroplitis Ashmead, 1898 View in CoL . Nixon, 1965: 234. Status revised (genus resurrected).

Protomicroplitis Ashmead, 1898 View in CoL . Mason, 1981: 124. Status revised (generic limits revised).

Description. Head relatively transverse (maximum width of head 1.35–1.45 × its height) ( Figs 8 View FIGURES 3 – 10 , 12 View FIGURES 11 – 17 , 20 View FIGURES 18 – 24 , 25 View FIGURES 25 – 29 ); antenna with placodes comparatively short (0.2–0.4 × as long as a flagellomere) and scattered irregularly along the length of the flagellomere (so that the appearance of a middle constriction in the flagellomere, typical in most Microgastrinae , is missing); apical flagellomeres relatively elongated, length of flagellomere 2 at most 1.9 × length of flagellomere 14; anteromesoscutum smooth to finely punctate (punctures shallow and sparse), with little or no trace of notauli ( Figs 4 View FIGURES 3 – 10 , 15 View FIGURES 11 – 17 , 23 View FIGURES 18 – 24 , 29 View FIGURES 25 – 29 ); apical polished rim of scutellar disc interrupted medially by sculpture ( Figs 9 View FIGURES 3 – 10 , 15 View FIGURES 11 – 17 ); propodeum strongly rugose and with median carina ( Figs 9 View FIGURES 3 – 10 , 16 View FIGURES 11 – 17 , 24 View FIGURES 18 – 24 , 29 View FIGURES 25 – 29 ); fore wing with triangular areolet ( Figs 6 View FIGURES 3 – 10 , 13 View FIGURES 11 – 17 , 19 View FIGURES 18 – 24 , 28 View FIGURES 25 – 29 ); hind wing with vannal lobe strongly convex, margin with very short setae; T1 rather strongly constrained medially (width at half length of tergite 0.4–0.6 × its width at anterior and/or posterior margins of tergite) ( Figs 7 View FIGURES 3 – 10 , 17 View FIGURES 11 – 17 , 22 View FIGURES 18 – 24 ); T1 length around 4.0 × its width at apex, and at least 6.0 × its width at half length of tergite; hypopygium short and not pleated medially ( Figs 10 View FIGURES 3 – 10 , 14 View FIGURES 11 – 17 ); ovipositor short, decurved and abruptly tapered near the middle ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 3 – 10 ); relatively large body length (4.4–5.5 mm, usually over 4.8 mm), and fore wing length (4.1–5.2 mm, usually over 4.4 mm); body length usually (but not always) 0.1–0.2 mm larger than fore wing length.

The relatively large but thin mediotergite 1, which is distinctively narrower medially, is a diagnostic feature of Protomicroplitis . Only the genus Wilkinsonellus and a few species of Diolcogaster (mostly D. lelaps and morphologically related species, all forming what has been called the lelaps species-group –e.g., Nixon 1965) have similar mediotergite 1. Wilkinsonellus has no areolet in the fore wing, and a very distinctive and unique venation pattern. The Diolcogaster lelaps species-group has a quadrangular areolet which is relatively larger than that of Protomicroplitis species (which have a relatively small and triangular areolet). Additionally, the antenna in Protomicroplitis has short and irregular placodes whereas both Wilkinsonellus and the D. lelaps species-group have placodes arranged in two ranks, with the median constriction characteristic of most Microgastrinae .

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Braconidae

Loc

Protomicroplitis

Fernandez-Triana, J. L. 2015
2015
Loc

Protomicroplitis

Mason 1981: 124
1981
Loc

Protomicroplitis

Nixon 1965: 234
1965
Loc

Microgaster

Muesebeck 1922: 20
1922
Loc

Protomicroplitis mediatus

Viereck 1914: 124
1914
Loc

Protomicroplitis germani

Ashmead 1900: 132
1900
Loc

Protomicroplitis mediatus

Ashmead 1900: 292
1900
Loc

Protomicroplitis

Ashmead 1898: 167
1898
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF