Ithocritus ruber ( Hope, 1839 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11865/zs20140214 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AFA09F12-90DD-4073-AEE8-37E64961D474 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D08794-6F4A-FFC3-FF60-FB36FE608864 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Ithocritus ruber ( Hope, 1839 ) |
status |
|
Ithocritus ruber ( Hope, 1839) View in CoL ( Figs 1–11 View Figs 1–6 View Figs 7–11 )
Monohammus ruber Hope, 1839: 43 (Assam of India); Hope, 1840: 441, pl. 30, fig. 5.
Ithocritus ruber View in CoL ; Lacordaire, 1872: 449; Breuning, 1956: 354, fig. 1; Löbl & Smetana, 2010: 291; Lin & Jiroux, 2011: 108, figs 13–18;
N. Ohbayashi & Lin, 2012: 238, figs 1–5.
Supplementary description of female. Antennae about twice of body length, middle of 6th antennomere exceeding elytral apex. Antennomere ratio. Female: 34:4:89:74:61:56:53:47:45:42:66. Female genitalia ( Figs 9–11 View Figs 7–11 ). The paraproct is very short and without baculi; the coxite lobes are very long and bear small styli; apex of coxite lobe and stylus ( Fig. 11 View Figs 7–11 ) bearing tactile hairs; spermathecal capsule ( Fig. 10 View Figs 7–11 ) with apical lobe more strongly sclerotized and apex expanded, but the very long and twisted stalk without distinct separations from both apical lobe and spermathecal duct; tergite and sternite VIII ( Fig. 9 View Figs 7–11 ) with moderate long setae, more than half part of setae extending beyond apex; distinct lateral notch absent, basal pigmented patch present; tignum (= spiculum ventrale = anterior apodeme of sternite VIII, Fig. 9b View Figs 7–11 ) much shorter than abdomen in ventral view, in our observation, tignum is 4.0 mm for a 13.5 mm abdomen.
Notes. N. Ohbayashi and Lin (2012) missed the distribution information of “Sikkim (coll. Itzinger); Silhet (coll. Lepesme)”, which was mentioned by Breuning (1956). Here we correct the mistake and add the new locality Yunnan of China.
Female of this species was described by Breuning (1936) and illustrated by Breuning (1936) and N. Ohbayashi and Lin (2012), but the female genitalia is described and illustrated for the first time. The easiest ways to identify female from male are: antenna shorter ( Figs 1–2 View Figs 1–6 ); apex of ventrite V (sternite VII) with a bidentate protruding ( Figs 3–4 View Figs 1–6 ); femora of fore legs without coarse wrinkling sculpture ( Figs 5–6 View Figs 1–6 , male fore femora with coarse wrinkling sculpture in both inner side and outer side).
Male of this species was described and illustrated several times ( Hope, 1839, 1840; Lin & Jiroux, 2011; N. Ohbayashi & Lin, 2012), male genitalia was described and illustrated by Lin and Jiroux (2011). The specimen from Yunnan matches leg, inner side. 5. Male, showing the coarse wrinkling sculpture. 6. Female, without coarse wrinkling sculpture. Not to scale.
© Zoological Systematics, 39 (2): 309–312 with specimen from India very well in both external features and genitalia ( Figs 7–8 View Figs 7–11 ).
Distribution. China (new country record, Yunnan), India (Assam, Sikkim), Bangladesh (Silhet= Sylhet), Myanmar (Kachin, Mandaley).
Type material examined. Syntypes of Monohammus ruber Hope , 2♂, India, Assam, leg. William Griffith ( OUMNH). Examined by pictures taken by James Hogan .
Other material examined. China. 1♂, 1♀, Yunnan, Longchuan, Husa Xiang (24.358315°N, 97.834079°E, elev. 1 353 m), 10 August 2013, leg. Zhi-Shun Song, Qiang-Feng Zheng ( IZCAS) GoogleMaps . India. 1♂, Khasia Hills ( OUMNH, Ex Hope-Westwood Collection. Pres. 1849-1857 OX. UNI. MUS. NAT. HIST.) . Myanmar. 1♀, N. Myammer, North Putao, Kachin, Mt. Shan Gunung , elev. 1 400 m, 7 August 2000, leg. Hiroshi Miyama ( EUMJ) ; 1♂, 1♀, Burma, Ruby Mina (= Mogok, Mandalay Div.) ( EUMJ) .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ithocritus ruber ( Hope, 1839 )
Lin, Mei-Ying & Yang, Xing-Ke 2014 |
Ithocritus ruber
Breuning 1956: 354 |
Lacordaire 1872: 449 |
Monohammus ruber
Hope & Descriptions of some new insects & Assam by William Griffith & Esq & Madras Medical Service & Assam & The Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 1840: 441 |
Hope 1839: 43 |