Aedes dendrophilus
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.166051 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5CF6EE39-1E13-4F82-BBF7-F7F8D77340D2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5616484 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CE87C5-FF9E-E50D-0B26-FE2A5E529DB6 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Aedes dendrophilus |
status |
|
THE DENDROPHILUS View in CoL GROUP
(males of muroafcete and njombiensis unknown)
28(5). Hindtibia with a white stripe on ventral surface in basal area ( Huang 1997, Figs. 3 View FIGURE 3 A,B,C; 4A,B,C; 5B; 6B,C; 7B,C; 8B,C; 9B,C; 13B,C; 14B,C) ......................... 29 Hindtibia without a white stripe on ventral surface in basal area ( Huang 1997, Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 B,C; 10B,C; 11B; 12B,C) .......................................................................... 38
29(28). White kneespot absent on hindfemur, or represented by few pale scales ( Huang 1997, Figs. 3 View FIGURE 3 A,B; 5B).......................................................................................... 30 White kneespot present and well developed on hindfemur ( Huang 1997, Figs. 3 View FIGURE 3 C; 4A,B,C; 6B,C; 7B,C; 8B,C; 9B,C; 13B,C; 14B,C) .............................................. 31
30(29). Hindtarsomere 5 all dark ( Huang 1997, Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 B) .................................. muroafcete Hindtarsomere 5 with basal 0.50–0.75 white on dorsal surface ( Huang 1997, Figs. 3 View FIGURE 3 A,B)......................................................................................................... bambusae
31(29). Hindtarsomere 5 all dark ( Huang 1997, Figs. 4 View FIGURE 4 B,C) .................................... deboeri Hindtarsomere 5 with a basal white band or all white ( Huang 1997, Figs. 3 View FIGURE 3 C; 4A; 6B,C; 7B,C; 8B,C; 9B,C; 13B,C; 14B,C) ............................................................ 32
32(31). Scutum with anterior median white spot of broad scales ( Huang 1997, Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 A). ........................................................................................................... mattinglyorum Scutum with anterior median white spot of narrow scales ( Huang 1997, Figs. 5 View FIGURE 5 C; 7C)........................................................................................................................33
33(32). Hindleg with tarsal claws equal and toothed ( Huang 1997, Figs. 2 View FIGURE 2 C,D; 7D,E; 8A,D) .............................................................................................................................. 34 Hindleg with tarsal claws equal and simple ( Huang 1997, Figs. 14 View FIGURE 14 A,D) ............ 36
34(33). Female fore, mid and hindlegs with tarsal claws equal and toothed (modified tooth); male hindleg with tarsal claws equal and toothed (modified tooth) ( Huang 1997, Figs. 8 View FIGURE 8 A,D) ..................................................................................... hansfordi Female fore, mid and hindlegs with tarsal claws equal and toothed (normal tooth); male hindleg with tarsal claws equal and toothed (normal tooth) ( Huang 1997, Figs. 7 View FIGURE 7 D,E)................................................................................................. 35
35(34) Hindtarsomere 3 with basal 0.2 or less white on dorsal surface; hindtarsomere 5 with basal 0.470.88 white on dorsal surface ( Huang 1997, Figs. 3 View FIGURE 3 C; 4A) .. kenyae Hindtarsomere 3 with basal 0.320.41 white on dorsal surface; hindtarsomere 5 all white (female), or with basal 0.840.89 white to all white on dorsal surface (male) ( Huang 1997, Figs. 7 View FIGURE 7 B,C) .................................................................... dendrophilus
36(33). Female fore and midlegs with tarsal claws equal and simple; male fore and midlegs with tarsal claws unequal, all simple ( Huang 1997, Figs. 14 View FIGURE 14 A,D)................... ............................................................................................................... segermanae Female fore and midlegs with tarsal claws equal and toothed; male fore and midlegs with tarsal claws unequal, the smaller one toothed, the larger one simple ( Huang 1997, Figs. 6 View FIGURE 6 A,D; 9A,D) ........................................................................ 37
37(36). Midtarsomere 1 with a wellmarked white stripe on posterior surface; hindtarsomere 5 with basal 0.400.67 white on dorsal surface ( Huang 1997, Figs. 9 View FIGURE 9 B,C) ....... ....................................................................................................................... heischi Midtarsomere 1 without a wellmarked white stripe on posterior surface; hindtarsomere 5 all white, or all white except tip ( Huang 1997, Figs. 6 View FIGURE 6 B,C) ... demeilloni
38(28). Hindtarsomere 3 with basal 0.11–0.25 white on dorsal surface ( Huang 1997, Figs. 10 View FIGURE 10 B,C; 11B)...........................................................................................................39 Hindtarsomere 3 all dark ( Huang 1997, Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 B,C; 12B,C) ............................. 40
39(38). Scutum with anterior median white spot of broad scales ( Huang 1997, Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 C) .. ................................................................................................................... keniensis Scutum with anterior median white spot of narrow scales ( Huang 1997, Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 A) ............................................................................................................... njombiensis
40(38). Scutum with yellow median stripe, the yellow median stripe connects with the anterior median white spot; male fore and midlegs with tarsal claws unequal, the smaller one toothed, the larger one simple ( Huang 1997, Figs. 12 View FIGURE 12 A,E) ...... masseyi Scutum with white median stripe, the white median stripe does not connect with the anterior median white spot; male fore and midlegs with tarsal claws unequal, all toothed ( Huang 1997, Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 A,D) ...................................................... amaltheus
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Stegomyia |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Stegomyia |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Stegomyia |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Stegomyia |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Stegomyia |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Stegomyia |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Stegomyia |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Stegomyia |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Stegomyia |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Stegomyia |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Stegomyia |