Rufocumbre schneideri, Dolibaina & Mielke & Casagrande, 2017

Dolibaina, Diego Rodrigo, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik & Casagrande, Mirna Martins, 2017, Taxonomy of Rufocumbre gen. nov., a new Moncini skipper genus (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae), Zootaxa 4365 (2), pp. 196-216 : 210-211

publication ID	https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4365.2.5
publication LSID	lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D9EA4014-FE5B-4F23-86F8-9E2853A312C2
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6032061
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CC878E-FFCD-FFB4-FF4E-FB9363CA13E7
treatment provided by	Plazi (2017-12-18 07:58:32, last updated 2024-11-29 16:48:51)
scientific name	Rufocumbre schneideri
status	sp. nov.

Treatment

Rufocumbre schneideri sp. nov.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:71BC9F9D-5A62-4244-9B7E-10216822228B Figs 13–16 View FIGURES 1–20 , 24 View FIGURES 21–25 , 36 View FIGURES 35–37 , 41 View FIGURES 40–42 , 46 View FIGURES 43–47 , 56 View FIGURE 56 .

Cumbre belli eberti View in CoL [misidentification]; K. Brown & Mielke, 1967. Jour. Lep. Soc. 21: 166. Cumbre View in CoL sp. n.; Dolibaina; Mielke & Casagrande, 2011. Biota Neotrop. 11 (1): 345.

Diagnosis. This species is distinguished from all the other species of Rufocumbre by having the uncus widely bifid, with the arms extremely narrowed; proximal margin of ampulla not projected; distal projection of harpe exceeding the distal margin of ampulla by a short distance ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 35–37 ); lamella antevaginalis widely bifid, with narrow projections, and a patch of membrane in the middle ( Fig. 41 View FIGURES 40–42 ).

Description. Forewing length: Male 15.5–17.2 mm, female 14.2–17 mm.

Forewing dorsal ( Figs 13, 15 View FIGURES 1–20 , 24 View FIGURES 21–25 ): brand with the distal margin of the superior projection irregular near the middle, and the inferior projection angled; ellipsoid cream spot on 2A, at the center of 2A, developed in both sexes.

Hind wing ventral ( Figs 14, 16 View FIGURES 1–20 ): basal and postdiscal bands dark orange, without gray to purple scales on the basal band; postdiscal band very short in Rs-M1.

Male genitalia ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 35–37 ): Fenestra semicircular and large; uncus widely bifid, arms parallel to gnathos, narrow, about 1/3 the width of the gnathos arm, tip pointed; ampulla with the proximal margin not projected, and dorsodistal margin with a small tip; distal spine of harpe larger and less pointed than in other species, short, exceeding the distal margin of ampulla by a short distance; aedeagus distally bifid, with convergent and unequal projections; cornutus absent.

Female genitalia ( Figs 41 View FIGURES 40–42 , 46 View FIGURES 43–47 ): Lamella antevaginalis widely bifid from base, with narrow and divergent projections, and a patch of membrane at the middle of each projection; lamella postvaginalis distally bifid, with large and convergent rounded projections; ductus bursae smooth at the insertion with corpus bursae; corpus bursae with two long and large lines of signa, extending for almost all its extension, each line medially crossed by a narrow and smooth area.

Comments. This species is very similar and potentially sympatric with R. celioi sp. nov. ( Figs 1–4 View FIGURES 1–20 ). Both species were collected in adjacent areas in Paraná state ( Figs 54 View FIGURE 54 , 56 View FIGURE 56 ); however, unlike the situation for R. celioi sp. nov., R. schneideri sp. nov. is known from few and sparse records from Tocantins to Paraná ( Fig. 56 View FIGURE 56 ), with just one specimen collected for each locality (with the exception of Sobradinho, Brasília, Distrito Federal where a male and a female were collected in 1966 and 1968, respectively). The males of R. schneideri sp. nov. are readily distinguished from those of R. celioi sp. nov. by the developed brand on the dorsal forewing ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 21–25 ) and by the deeply bifid uncus with narrow arms ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 35–37 ). Females are easily separated by the presence of the lamella antevaginalis in R. schneideri sp. nov. ( Fig. 41 View FIGURES 40–42 ) whereas it is absent in R. celioi sp. nov. ( Fig. 38 View FIGURES 38–39 ), a character easily observable in dry specimens after removing the scales of the tip of the abdomen (dissection is not required).

Brown & Mielke (1967) listed this new species as Cumbre belli eberti from Central Brazil Plateau (specimen from Sobradinho, Brasília), while Dolibaina et al. (2011) mentioned it as Cumbre sp. n. from Guarapuava region, Paraná.

Geographical distribution and phenology. Rufocumbre schneideri sp. nov. is known from a few records from Tocantins, Distrito Federal, Minas Gerais and Paraná, in areas between 200 and 1365 m ( Fig. 56 View FIGURE 56 ). Specimens were collected in January, February, March, May, October and December.

Etymology. This new species is dedicated in memory of our friend the late Hipólito Schneider, an amateur insect collector that lived in Guarapuava, Paraná, whose work inspired the first author to study Lepidoptera .

Examined material. The holotype male has the following labels: / HOLOTYPUS / 29-30-I-2006 12,5 Km N VENTANIA , PARANÁ [, BRAZIL], 1000m O. MIELKE LEG. / Gen[italia]. Prep[ared]. Dolibaina 2010 / DZ 15.736/ BC-DZ / HOLOTYPUS Rufocumbre schneideri Dolibaina, Mielke & Casagrande det. 2017/. DZUP.

The allotype female has the following labels: / ALLOTYPUS / 19-III-1991 Água Mineral, Tibagi, P[a]R[aná, Brazil]. Mielke & Casagrande leg / Gen[italia]. Prep[ared]. Dolibaina 2010 / DZ 17.114 / ALLOTYPUS Rufocumbre schneideri Dolibaina, Mielke & Casagrande det. 2017/. DZUP.

Paratypes: BRAZIL – Tocantins: Ilha do Bananal, 28.V.1979, Gifford leg. 1 female (DZ 15.619*) (DZUP). Distrito Federal: Brasília (Sobradinho), 1050 m, 24.II.1966, Mielke leg. 1 male (OM 8.992*) (OM), 26.XII.1968, Ebert leg. 1 female (DZ 15.647*) (DZUP). Minas Gerais: Conceição dos Ouros, 1365 m, 30.III.2005, Almeida leg. 1 male (OM 66.843*) (OM), (Serra Grande), 8.II.2003, Mielke & Casagrande leg. 1 female (OM 59.073*) (OM); Poços de Caldas, 1250 m, 2-4.X.1966, Ebert leg. 1 female (DZ 10.346*) (DZUP). Paraná: Ponta Grossa (20 Km N – Piriquitos), 900 m, 31.I.1990, Mielke leg. 1 male (OM 25.079*) (OM); Prudentópolis (RPPN Ninho do Corvo), 800 m, 12.X.2008, Dolibaina leg. 1 male (DD 207*) (DD).

References

Dolibaina, D. R., Mielke, O. H. H. & Casagrande, M. M. (2011) Borboletas (Papilionoidea e Hesperioidea) de Guarapuava e arredores, Parana, Brasil: um inventario com base em 63 anos de registros. Biota Neotropica, 11 (1), 341 - 354. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1590 / s 1676 - 06032011000100031

Figures

FIGURE 54.Geographical distribution of Rufocumbre celioi sp. nov.

FIGURE 56.Geographical distribution of Rufocumbre schneideri sp. nov. and R.lucasi sp. nov.

FIGURES 1–20. Species of Rufocumbre in dorsal and ventral views, male (left) and female (right). 1–4, R. celioi sp. nov., male holotype and female allotype. 5–8, R. emeryi sp. nov., male holotype and female allotype. 9–12, R. eberti stat. nov., comb. nov., male (OM 59.360) and female (OM 19.333) from Caraça, Catas Altas, Minas Gerais, Brazil. 13–16, R. schneideri sp. nov., male holotype and female allotype. 17–20, R. lucasi sp. nov., male holotype and female allotype.Scale bar = 1 cm.

FIGURES 21–25. Male brand in dorsal forewing of species of Rufocumbre. 21, R. celioi sp. nov., paratype from Boa Vista, Tibagi, Paraná, Brazil (OM 52.771). 22, R. emeryi sp. nov., paratype from Córrego Grotão, Planaltina, Distrito Federal, Brazil (DZ 8.676). 23, R. eberti stat. nov., comb. nov., from Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil (OM 65.904). 24, R. schneideri sp. nov., paratype from RPPN Ninho do Corvo, Prudentópolis, Paraná, Brazil (DD 207). 25, R. lucasi sp. nov., paratype from Morro do Pai Inácio, Palmeiras, Bahia, Brazil (OM 50.016).Scale bar = 1 mm.

FIGURES 35–37. Male genitalia of species of Rufocumbre.Left to right: dorsal view of tegumen, uncus and gnathos; ventral view of tegumen, uncus and gnathos; lateral view of tegumen, saccus, uncus and gnathos; left view of the right valva; posterior and lateral views of fultura inferior; lateral left, dorsal, ventral and lateral right views of the aedeagus. 35, R. eberti stat. nov., comb. nov., from Caraça, Catas Altas, Minas Gerais, Brazil (DZ 15.367). 36, R. schneideri sp. nov., paratype from Ventania, Paraná, Brazil (DZ 15.736). 37, R. lucasi sp. nov., paratype from Morro do Pai Inácio, Palmeiras, Bahia, Brazil (OM 50.016). Scale bar = 1 mm.

FIGURES 40–42. Female genitalia of species of Rufocumbre in ventral view. Papilla analis, sterigma, tergum VIII and bursa copulatrix.40, R.eberti stat. nov., comb. nov., from Ouro Preto,Minas Gerais, Brazil(OM 66.016).41, R.schneideri sp. nov., paratype from Serra Grande, Conceição dos Ouros, Minas Gerais, Brazil (OM 59.073). 42, R. lucasi sp. nov., paratype from Morro do Pai Inácio, Palmeiras, Bahia, Brazil (OM 50.179).Scale bar = 1 mm.

FIGURES 43–47. Female genitalia of species of Rufocumbre in lateral view. Papilla analis, sterigma, tergum VIII and bursa copulatrix. 43, R. celioi sp. nov., paratype from Bituva, Mafra, Santa Catarina, Brazil (DZ 17.124). 44, R. emeryi sp. nov., paratype from Fazenda Água Limpa, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil (DZ 20.891). 45, R. eberti stat. nov., comb. nov., from Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil (OM 66.016). 46, R. schneideri sp. nov., paratype from Serra Grande, Conceição dos Ouros, Minas Gerais, Brazil (OM 59.073). 47, R. lucasi sp. nov., paratype from Morro do Pai Inácio, Palmeiras, Bahia, Brazil (OM 50.179).Scale bar = 1 mm.

FIGURES 38–39. Female genitalia of species of Rufocumbre in ventral view. Papilla analis, sterigma, tergum VIII and bursa copulatrix. 38, R. celioi sp. nov., paratype from Bituva, Mafra, Santa Catarina, Brazil (DZ 17.124). 39, R. emeryi sp. nov., paratype from Fazenda Água Limpa, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil (DZ 20.891). Scale bar = 1 mm.