Macronotops medogensis Qiu, Xu & Chen, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4556.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7C55D5CB-5A0F-4DCE-A5A7-755339CF45F3 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5934031 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CA3425-FFBC-A407-C2E9-FFA915BE1000 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Macronotops medogensis Qiu, Xu & Chen |
status |
sp. nov. |
Macronotops medogensis Qiu, Xu & Chen View in CoL new species
( Figs. 20–21 View FIGURES 1–23 , 44–45 View FIGURES 24–47 , 68–69 View FIGURES 66–71 , 102–103 View FIGURES 99–110 , 121 View FIGURES 111–122 , 133 View FIGURES 122–134 , 185–190 View FIGURES 185–190 , 223–224 View FIGURES 215–226 , 276–277 View FIGURES 276–281 , 311 View FIGURES 310–312 )
Type material. CHINA: Xizang: ♂ (Holotype, SWU), 15–20.VIII.2011, Yarlung Tsangpo Grand Canyon Nature Reserve, Bononggong (80K), Mêdog County, 2,300 m, Yang HE. Paratypes (15♂♂, 9♀♀) : 1♀ (Allotype, SWU), 15–20.VIII.2011, Yarlung Tsangpo Grand Canyon Nature Reserve, Bononggong (80 K) , Mêdog County, 2,300 m, Yang HE ; 1♂, 1♀ ( QCCC), 15–20.VIII.2011, Yarlung Tsangpo Grand Canyon Nature Reserve, Bononggong (80 K) , Mêdog County, 2,300 m, Yang HE ; 2♂♂, 2♀♀ ( CCCC), 9.VIII.2012, Yarlung Tsangpo Grand Canyon Nature Reserve, Bononggong (80 K) , Mêdog County, Xiao-Dong YANG ; 2♂♂, 2♀♀ ( QCCC), 31.VII.2015, Yarlung Tsangpo Grand Canyon Nature Reserve, Bononggong (80 K) , Mêdog County, Zhuo CHEN ; 4♂♂, 1♀ ( QCCC), 17–19.VII.2016, Yarlung Tsangpo Grand Canyon Nature Reserve, Bononggong (80 K) , Mêdog County, 2,130 m, Jian-Yue QIU & Hao XU ; 1♂, 1♀ ( CCCC), 29.VII.2016, Yarlung Tsangpo Grand Canyon Nature Reserve, Bononggong (80 K) , Mêdog County, 2,111 m, Xiao-Dong YANG ; 1♂ ( CCCC), 1.VIII.2016, Mêdog County, Xiao-Dong YANG ; 1♀ ( CCCC), 13.VIII.2016, Yarlung Tsangpo Grand Canyon Nature Reserve, Bononggong (80 K) , Mêdog County, 2,111 m, Xiao-Dong YANG ; 1♂ ( CCCC), 14.VIII.2016, Yarlung Tsangpo Grand Canyon Nature Reserve, Bononggong (80 K) , Mêdog County, 2,111 m, Xiao-Dong YANG ; 1♂ ( QCCC), 13.VII.2017, Yarlung Tsangpo Grand Canyon Nature Reserve, Bononggong (80 K) , Mêdog County, 2,130 m, Si- Yao HUANG ; 1♂ ( LQCL), VIII.2012, Hanmi, Mêdog County, Hao HUANG ; 1♂ ( KSCJ), VII.2012, Hanmi, Motuo [Mêdog] .
Holotype (male). General: Body length 15.5 mm; width 7.0 mm, widest at humeral umbone, gradually narrowed backward. Body brown to dark brown. Surface with fulvous, brown, black and light yellow setae, and yellow tomentous maculae. Head: Brown. Dorsal surface with sparse, fulvous setae; setae long on frons. Clypeus narrow; anterior margin arcuated, slightly raised; clypeolateral ridge indistinct. Frons with a slightly raised longitudinal ridge ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 1–23 ). Maxillary palpus and labial palpus brown. Antenna yellowish-brown; antennal club very long, about twice length of antennomeres 2–7 combined; inner side of antennomere 8 with short, dense, fulvous setae ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 1–23 ). Ventral surface clad with long, fulvous setae ( Fig. 186 View FIGURES 185–190 ). Pronotum: Brown. Widest at base, basomedian area depressed. Lateral margin curved; posterior margin distinctly protruded; disc with two pronotal ridges and a narrow, longitudinal ridge medially ( Fig. 185 View FIGURES 185–190 ). Surface densely clad with fulvous and black setae; black setae only on basolateral area; medial ridge glabrous ( Fig. 185 View FIGURES 185–190 ). Scutellum: Dark brown, with sparse, fulvous setae. Elytron: Brown; lateral macula and distal macula large; without posthumeral macula and median macula. Surface densely clad with setae; setae long between sutural and discolateral costae; setae light yellow on maculae; setae dark brown to black on lateral declivity except for posthumeral area; setae fulvous on the rest of elytron; humeral umbone glabrous ( Fig. 185 View FIGURES 185–190 ). Mesepimeron: Dark brown to black, clad with yellow tomenta and light yellow setae. Metepisternum: Dark brown to black, clad with fulvous setae and a small tomentous macula. Metepimeron: Black, with long, fulvous setae. Sternum: Preprosternum reddish-brown, with sparse, long, fulvous setae. Mesosternum dark brown, with long, fulvous setae. Mesometasternal process short, glabrous, brown, apex rounded; mesometasternal suture depressed, with long, fulvous setae. Metasternum black, with long, dense, fulvous setae; middle portion glabrous ( Fig. 186 View FIGURES 185–190 ). Pygidium: Dark brown; with dense, fulvous setae; a small, triangular, yellow, tomentous macula in middle ( Fig. 102 View FIGURES 99–110 ). Abdomen: Reddish-brown to dark brown. Median portion slightly depressed. Six abdominal sternites visible; sternites clad with fulvous setae; setae on sternite II dense, long; setae on sternites III–V short, sparse in medial, but longer and denser on sides; setae near posterior margin of sternite VI long, dense; sternite VII almost glabrous, with sparse, short setae on sides; sternites II–V densely clad with black and fulvous setae in dorsal and lateral portion ( Fig. 186 View FIGURES 185–190 ). Legs: Slender, simple. Metacoxa black, with long, light yellow and black setae. Femora and tibia dark brown, with fulvous setae. Protibia with 3 teeth; the proximal tooth small and indistinct; without tiny tooth ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 24–47 ). Mesotibia with a small spine near middle of outer margin; metatibia with a row of long, brush-like, sparse, fulvous setae along inner margin ( Figs. 185–186 View FIGURES 185–190 ); dorsal tooth of metatibia distinctly longer than basitarsus, outer tooth absent ( Fig. 68 View FIGURES 66–71 ). Tarsi dark brown; each segment of metatarsus with sparse, long setae ( Fig. 68 View FIGURES 66–71 ). Genitalia: Parameres broad, long; apex slightly rounded. Interparameral split narrow; base with little membrane, protruding medially. Median lobe flagelliform, gradually narrowed to apex; apical half twisted; very long ( Fig. 121 View FIGURES 111–122 ).
Female. Body length 15.5–19.5 mm; width 7.5–8.5 mm. Except for sexual dimorphism characteristics of the genus, body color darker ( Figs. 188–190 View FIGURES 185–190 ), abdominal sternites with more short, fulvous setae in medial ( Fig. 189 View FIGURES 185–190 ); dorsal tooth of metatibia larger ( Fig. 69 View FIGURES 66–71 ), setae on mesotibia and metatibia sparser, basitarsus of metatarsus with less setae ( Fig. 69 View FIGURES 66–71 ).
Variability. Male paratypes length 14.5–17.0 mm, width 6.5–7.5 mm. The lateral maculae and tomentous maculae on the mesepimeron could be very small, even absent ( Fig. 187 View FIGURES 185–190 ). The setae between the sutural and discolateral costae of the elytra are black in some females ( Fig. 188 View FIGURES 185–190 ).
Differential diagnosis. Length of clypeus greater than width. Antenna yellowish-brown ( Figs. 20–21 View FIGURES 1–23 ), male antennal club very long. Disc of pronotum with a glabrous, narrow, longitudinal ridge medially ( Figs. 185, 188, 190 View FIGURES 185–190 ). Elytra usually with lateral maculae and distal maculae ( Figs. 185, 188, 190 View FIGURES 185–190 ). Metepisternum usually with a yellow macula ( Figs. 185, 188 View FIGURES 185–190 ). Pygidium with a small triangular macula ( Figs. 102–103 View FIGURES 99–110 ). Abdominal sides without yellow macula. Dorsal tooth of male metatibia distinctly longer than basitarsus of metatarsus ( Fig. 68 View FIGURES 66–71 ).
This new species is highly similar to M. curvimarginatus , but can be distinguished by antenna yellowish- brown ( Figs. 20–21 View FIGURES 1–23 ; in M. curvimarginatus dark brown, Figs. 18–19 View FIGURES 1–23 ), pygidium with a small triangular tomentous macula ( Figs. 102–103 View FIGURES 99–110 ; in M. curvimarginatus usually absent, Figs. 99, 101 View FIGURES 99–110 ), abdominal surface with more setiferous punctures ( Figs. 186, 189 View FIGURES 185–190 ), posthumeral macula and median macula on male elytron absent ( Fig. 185 View FIGURES 185–190 ; present in M. curvimarginatus usually absent, Figs. 175, 177–178 View FIGURES 175–178 ), parameres distinctly longer, and basal half of median lobe wider ( Fig. 121 View FIGURES 111–122 ).
Etymology. The specific name of the new species refers to its area of occurrence, Mêdog County, China.
Distribution. China: Xizang.
Natural history. A photograph of the adult of this new species feeding the sap on a tree with Neolucanus sp. was presented in Huang & Chen (2013).
Remarks. Macronotops medogensis new species is currently only found in Mêdog County of Xizang ( Fig. 259 View FIGURES 258–260 ) and occurs sympatrically with M. curvimarginatus , and the differences of these two species are provided in the differential diagnosis.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |