Pharaxonothinae
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5757989 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F1B6BDED-9CCF-4356-945B-02662C461E1D |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C4DF35-8F78-FFBA-FF51-FBB8980FC353 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Pharaxonothinae |
status |
|
The maximum likelihood tree for Pharaxonothinae associated with northern hemisphere cycads is shown in Figure 3 View Figure 3 . This tree exhibits the same general clades produced in previous, smaller trees for Asian ( Xu et al. 2015; Skelley et al. 2017) and New World species ( Tang et al. 2018b), but with some differences in the branching of the clades relative to one another. Three genera, Ceratophila , Cycadophila , and Pharaxonotha , form the three main branches. The Asian genus, Cycadophila , is subdivided into subgenera Cycadophila Xu, Tang and Skelley and Strobilophila Skelley, Xu and Tang and subgenus Cycadophila is further subdivided into four species groups: lata, fupingensis, nigra, and papua (see Skelley et al. 2017). As in a previous DNA analysis of the New World forms ( Tang et al. 2018b) the genus Pharaxonotha can be divided into three groups: A) Early-diverging lineages from an older radiation that are distributed from Mexico to Colombia; B) A Caribbean radiation; C) A second, more recent, radiation from Mexico to Colombia and Bolivia. Bootstrap support for the position of some of these clades in the tree is weak and further analysis with a greater sampling of genes will help to improve their phylogenetic placement.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.