Coletinia maggii ( Grassi, 1887 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3615.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D53E1122-AA33-4152-90BE-3D717979C648 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5280121 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C0A74C-FFF8-FFD4-FF4F-699DE7DF92ED |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Coletinia maggii ( Grassi, 1887 ) |
status |
|
Coletinia maggii ( Grassi, 1887)
Figs. 164–172 View FIGURES 164–172
Studied material. Burgos, Cueva Grande, Atapuerca. July 2003. J. Zaragoza, V. Ortuño and A. Sendra leg., 1 male, deposited in MVHN, Cod.: 201206 RV 53; Burgos, Cueva de Atapuerca, 30 May 1975, A. Serra leg., 1 female, published in Molero-Baltanás et al. (1997) as Coletinia sp. VI, deposited in UCO, Ref. Z1959; Burgos, Barbadillo de Herreros, road to Monterrubio de la Demanda, 25 August 1992, inside a nest of Messor capitatus (Formicidae) , 1 female, published in Molero-Baltanás et al. (1997) as Coletinia sp. VI, deposited in UCO, Ref. Z1870. A male specimen from northern Italy, lent by L. F. Mendes, also was examined.
Descriptive remarks. The specimens from Burgos agree well with the redescription by Wygodzinsky (1980). The body length of the male is 9 mm, and both females are approximately 10 mm long. Macrosetae arew moderately twisted, those of the coxa with 3–5 turns. Apophyses of the antennal pedicellus of the male are simple, subcylindrical and apically rounded ( Fig. 164 View FIGURES 164–172 , also see Wygodzinsky 1980, Figs. 4A, 4B View FIGURES 3, 4 ). In the male from Burgos, the apical part of the apophysis reaches the fourth joint of the flagellum. L/W ratio of tibiae are as follows: protibiae 3.1–3.8, mesotibiae 3.5–4.1, metatibiae 4–4.5. Each tibia with 1 dorsal spine inserted in the distal half, 1 lateral spine inserted basally, and 4 ventral spines. Lateral spines on the protibiae and mesotibiae are inserted more dorsally than those on the metatibiae. The tenth urotergite of the male has a nearly semicircular emargination in the posterior border between the posterolateral lobes ( Fig. 165 View FIGURES 164–172 ); the shape in our specimens fall within the range of variability given in Wygodzinsky (1980). The disc of this urotergite is irregularly covered with thin setae (male) and devoid of setae in females, where the hind margin is typically straight across ( Fig. 166 View FIGURES 164–172 ); posterolateral lobes in the male specimen have 8+8 sensory pegs arranged in two irregular rows ( Fig. 167 View FIGURES 164–172 ). Urosternite VIII of the male protrudes posteriorly and has a straight hind margin ( Fig. 168 View FIGURES 164–172 ). Paramera slightly shorter than the ninth stylets and about 4–4.5 times longer than wide ( Fig. 169 View FIGURES 164–172 ). Subgenital plate semielliptical, wider at the base than long ( Fig. 170 View FIGURES 164–172 ) and with a rounded posterior border. The ovipositor has 20 and 21 divisions in the two females available, and extends beyond the ninth stylets by 2–3 times their length ( Fig. 171 View FIGURES 164–172 ). The cerci of the Iberian male bear 3–4 acute sensory pegs and the paracercus has 2 spiniform basal pegs ( Fig. 172 View FIGURES 164–172 ).
V |
Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium |
RV |
Collection of Leptospira Strains |
VI |
Mykotektet, National Veterinary Institute |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.