Anaphalis marcescens (Wight) C.B.Clarke
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/adansonia2021v43a17 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5573087 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C09B77-FFCA-3479-FF56-2FCDFABFFE65 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Anaphalis marcescens (Wight) C.B.Clarke |
status |
|
Anaphalis marcescens (Wight) C.B.Clarke View in CoL
In the Compositae Indicae: 110 ( Clarke 1876). — Basionym: Gnaphalium marcescens Wight View in CoL , Icones Plantarum Indiae Orientalis 3: 10 ( Wight 1846) ( Fig. 2B View FIG ).
TYPE CITATION. — “Neilgherries.”
LECTOTYPE (HERE DESIGNATED). — India. Tamil Nadu, Neeilgherries (Nilgiri District), s.d., Wight s.n. (lecto-, MH [ MH00007084 ]!).
RESIDUAL SYNTYPE. — India. Tamil Nadu, Neilgherries (Nilgiri District), s.d., Wight s.n. (syn-, K [ K000899039 image]!).
DISTRIBUTION. — India (Kerala and Tamil Nadu); Sri Lanka and China
REMARKS
Gnaphalium marcescens was originally described by Wight (1846) from Neeilgherries. Later Clarke (1876) in his book ‘ Compositae Indicae’ transferred G. marcescens to the genus Anaphalis DC. and named it as A. marcescens (Wight) C.B.Clarke . We have traced two specimens from two herbaria, one at MH (MH00007084) and one at K (K000899039). Of these, the sheet with barcode MH00007084 matches well with the illustration of the protologue by Wight. Hence it is designated here as the lectotype for the name G. marcescens .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Anaphalis marcescens (Wight) C.B.Clarke
Murugan, Perumal, Murugan, Chidambaram & Karthigeyan, Kaliyamurthy 2021 |
Gnaphalium marcescens
Wight 1846: 10 |