Melanostomini (Mengual, 2020)

Montoya, Augusto L. & Wolff, Marta, 2023, Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Argentinomyia Lynch-Arribálzaga, 1891 (Diptera: Syrphidae), with description of 16 new species, Zootaxa 5234 (1), pp. 1-157 : 12-13

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5234.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A540F250-BDE2-43F7-83A1-DA261F914B41

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7621110

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C03256-AC4C-FFE3-0FF9-FBB5F7BEF983

treatment provided by

Plazi (2023-02-06 09:25:52, last updated 2024-11-28 20:14:13)

scientific name

Melanostomini
status

 

Identification key to the Neotropical genera of Melanostomini and Bacchini

A key to the genera of Neotropical Melanostomini and Bacchini was prepared based on characters proposed by Fluke (1945, 1957), Thompson (1999a), Thompson (2006), Thompson et al. (2010), Huo (2014), Thompson & Skevington (2014), Young et al. (2016), Miranda & Moran (2017), Ramage et al. (2018) and Mengual (2020).

1. Postpronotum pilose (MCAD Fig. 30 View FIGURE 30 ); male abdomen with four unmodified pregenital segments; 5 th tergum usually not visible in dorsal view (MCAD Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 , 4 View FIGURE 4 ); female abdomen tergum 6 th hardened or membranous, visible, if tergum 6 th and onward visible, then these are membranous; epiproct as two plates that may be connected to the base, or as a single plate, or as a band with two projections (subfamilies Eristalinae View in CoL , Microdontinae View in CoL and Pipizinae).... other flower flies (“MCAD key couplet 2”)

- Postpronotum bare; male abdomen with five unmodified pregenital segments; 5 th tergum visible in dorsal view (MCAD Figs 53–61 View FIGURE 53 View FIGURE 54 View FIGURE 55 View FIGURE 56 View FIGURE 57 View FIGURE 58 View FIGURE 59 View FIGURE 60 View FIGURE 61 ); female abdomen tergum 6 th hardened, visible; epiproct divided into two plates that may be connected to the base (subfamily Syrphinae )................................................................................. 2

2. Face and/or scutellum partially yellow or yellowish-brown in background color; phallus (aedeagus) two-segmented........................................................................................ other Syrphinae genera

- Face and scutellum entirely black in background color (some species with partly pale face or scutellum); phallus (aedeagus) simple, unsegmented (Bacchini and Melanostomini )......................................................... 3

3. Face usually straight, oral margin and antennal bases in line, without tubercle, flat, straight or convex; abdomen petiolate, distinctly narrower than thorax ( Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4 , MCAD Figs 59 View FIGURE 59 , 60 View FIGURE 60 ); male: 2 nd tergum narrow, narrower than 3 rd and 4th terga ( Mengual et al. 2018, Fig. 18 View FIGURE 18 ); female abdominal tergum 6 th, not noticeable nor visible without dissection, tergum 6 th internal to the 5 th, tergum 5 th 1/10 of the length of tergum 4 th, almost inconspicuous ( Miranda & Moran 2017, Figs 59 View FIGURE 59 , 80 View FIGURE 80 and 90 View FIGURE 90 )................................................................................................ Leucopodella Hull View in CoL

- Face with tubercle; abdomen parallel-sided or narrowly oval (MCAD Figs 55 View FIGURE 55 , 58 View FIGURE 58 ); other characters variable; female tergum seventh visible without dissection........................................................................ 4

4. Antennal cavities broadly confluent (MCAD Fig. 24 View FIGURE 24 ); face narrow, with distinctive, rounded facial tubercle; metathoracic pleuron with several fine subappressed pile ventral to spiracle; katepisternum with pile patches broadly separated posteriorly, but joined anteriorly; abdomen oval, wide and flat, clearly broader than scutum, usually with yellow-orange maculae on 2 nd to 4 th terga; surstyli elongated, one-lobed, digitiform or pointed, generally widened apically, postgonites small, squarish or triangular in shape ( Fluke 1957: 278, Figs 119–122; Borges & Pamplona 2003); female tergum 5 th 1/3 of the length of tergum 4 th, tergum 6 th 1/3 of the length of 5 th ( Miranda & Moran 2017, Figs 66 View FIGURE 66 , 84 View FIGURE 84 and 97)................. Xanthandrus Verrall View in CoL

- Antennal cavities broadly separated (MCAD Fig. 23 View FIGURE 23 ); metathoracic pleuron bare; katepisternum with pile patches usually broadly separated throughout; abdomen variable, slender and parallel-sided, as broad as scutum; other characters variable... ................................................................................................... 5

5. Metasternum greatly reduced to a small diamond-shaped area ( Figs 3A View FIGURE 3 , 5J View FIGURE 5 ; Andersson 1970: 273, Fig. 1C View FIGURE 1 , 3C View FIGURE 3 ; Shatalkin 1975: 118, Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 ; Thompson et al 2010: 771, Fig. 34 View FIGURE 34 ; Haarto and Ståhls 2014: 95, Figs 1A View FIGURE 1 ; Thompson & Skevington 2014); antenna short, with scape and basoflagellomere as long as wide; face not produced below, with small tubercle, facial pollinosity neither punctate nor rippled (MCAD Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 ); male abdomen nearly parallel-sided, from two to five times as long as greatest width, female with abdomen varying from nearly parallel-sided to oval, from 1.7 to 2.5 times as long as greatest width; usually with triangular or subquadrate shaped yellow maculae; male genitalia with surstyli simple, one-lobed, elongate, straight and thin, with a small basomedial tubercle; postgonites (apex of hypandrium) massive, irregular or squarish in shape; female tergum 5 th 1/4 of the length of tergum 4 th, tergum 6 th 1/5 of the length of tergum 5 th ......................... Melanostoma Schiner View in CoL [Note: A new species described from Cameroon by Mengual (2020) does not have the reduced metasternum]

- Metasternum entire, not reduced ( Fig. 3B View FIGURE 3 ; MCAD Fig. 35 View FIGURE 35 ; Haarto and Ståhls 2014: 95, Fig. 1B View FIGURE 1 ; SNLSA Fig. 12C View FIGURE 12 ); face variable, almost straight in profile with weak tubercle or moderately to strongly produced forward ventrally, sometimes with pollinosity forming punctuate or rippled pattern, other characters variable........................................ 6

6. Face produced forward into a snout, with a very prominent and abrupt tubercle closer to the antennal base than to the oral opening apex ( Fig. 4N View FIGURE 4 , Fluke 1943: 427, Figs 1–7 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 ); face sparsely pollinose and without punctate shiny (bare) maculae ( Fig. 4N View FIGURE 4 ); head as long as or longer than high, wider than thorax; male eyes dichoptic or holoptic; antenna elongate, as long as or longer than face; basoflagellomere elongate, four or more times as long as broad, near equal to scape and pedicel together ( Fig. 4N View FIGURE 4 ); notopleura without a distinct tubercle; subscutellar fringe short, thin and white; prolegs simple in male, sometimes with a curled tibial seta ( Fig. 4N View FIGURE 4 , Fluke 1943: 427, Figs 8–9 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 ); male genitalia with surstyli curved; superior lobes transverse and elongated; ejaculatory apodeme elongate and knobbed toward the apex ( Fluke, 1957: 278, Figs 124–125; Shatalkin 1975: 118, Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 ); small species, shining black or blue metallic, 7mm or less.............. Platycheirus (Tuberculanostoma) Fluke

- Face straight or slightly produced anteriorly, with a low and indistinct tubercle, frequently densely pollinose and with small shiny punctate-like bare maculae; head higher than long; male eyes face not greatly produced anteriorly; basoflagellomere oval or slightly elongate, never more than twice as long as broad; notopleura with a distinct tubercle; subscutellar fringe complete; male sometimes with legs modified, either broadened or with special bristles, pile tufts, modified hairs or none; frequently medium to large flies, sometimes with pale to metallic colored markings......................................... 7

7. Face slightly receding to rather strongly produced below, with obscure to prominent tubercle, densely pollinose and sometimes with pollinosity forming a distinctive bare punctum or rippled pattern ( Fig. 4M View FIGURE 4 ); male protibia usually with long black bristles posteriorly, sometimes protibia and/or tarsus expanded, usually with specialized setae ( Fig. 4M View FIGURE 4 ); abdomen nearly parallel-sided in males, narrowly oval in the female; with yellow to orange or silver-gray pollinose on bluish submetallic macula, generally with quadrate markings; surstyli bifid or bilobed with a long, slightly curved lateral lobe and a short, stout basomedial lobe, superior lobes usually slender, recurved and crescent-shaped ( Vockeroth 1990: Fig. 83 View FIGURE 83 ; Thompson & Skevington 2014; Young et al. 2016); female tergum 5 th 1/3 of the length of tergum 4 th, tergum 6 th 1/5 of the length of tergum 5 th ( Miranda & Moran 2017, Figs 70 View FIGURE 70 , 71 View FIGURE 71 , 86 View FIGURE 86 and 100).......................................................... Platycheirus (Carposcalis) View in CoL

- Face straight in profile, not produced anteriorly, usually uniformly pollinose, sometimes with shiny (bare) punctate maculae; male legs slender, without bristles, pile tufts, or modified hairs; abdomen frequently with pale-colored maculae; surstyli elongate, one-lobed, postgonites massive, irregular, elongate, triangular, or squarish in shape......................... 8

8. Antennae short, scape broader than long, scape nearly equal to pedicel, basoflagellomere large, slightly oval and apically rounded; face slightly receding to perpendicular with a well-rounded tubercle, never with transverse grooves dorsally along tubercle neither broadly (bare) punctuate ( Fig. 6D View FIGURE 6 ); mesocoxa pilose posteriorly ( Fig. 6E View FIGURE 6 , SNLSA Figs 12–13 View FIGURE 12 View FIGURE 13 ); abdomen elongated or with parallel sides, with four to five pairs of large rounded to triangular markings on terga, always with small macula on 5 th tergum; male genitalia greatly enlarged and strongly sclerotized, apex of hypandrium (superior lobes) and cerci elongated, surstyli three to four times longer than wide ( Fig. 6G View FIGURE 6 , Fluke 1957: 278, Fig. 123; SNLSA Figs 14A–D View FIGURE 14 ); female tergum 5 th 1/4 of the length of tergum 4 th, tergum 6 th 1/5 of the length of tergum 5 th (SNLSA Figs 13E View FIGURE 13 )...... Talahua Fluke View in CoL [Note: Montoya & Wolff (2020) provided a complete redescription for Talahua View in CoL , differential diagnosis, images of the habitus and illustrations of male genitalia]

- Antenna elongate, scape longer than broad; basoflagellomere oval or elongate; face straight in profile ( Figs 4 View FIGURE 4 , 6 – 9 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 , MCAD Fig. 22 View FIGURE 22 ), facial tubercle low dorsally, not distinct ( Figs 4 View FIGURE 4 , 6 – 9 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 ); mesocoxa bare posteriorly; male genitalia normal size, apex of hypandrium (superior lobes) triangular to rectangular, irregular in shape and cercus short; female tergum 5 th 1/3 of the length of tergum 4 th, tergum 6 th 1/4 of the length of tergum 5 th ( Figs 5 View FIGURE 5 , 6 View FIGURE 6 and 9 View FIGURE 9 )................. Argentinomyia Lynch-Arribálzaga View in CoL

Andersson, H. (1970) Taxonomic notes on the genera Platycheirus and Melanostoma (Dipt., Syrphidae) with lectotype designations. Entomologica Scandinavica, 1, 236 - 240. https: // doi. org / 10.1163 / 187631270 X 00087

Borges, Z. M. & Pamplona, D. M. (2003) Revision of the Neotropical Xanthandrus Verral (Diptera, Syrphidae). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 47, 155 - 167. https: // doi. org / 10.1590 / S 0085 - 56262003000200002

Fluke, C. L. (1943) A new genus and new species of Syrphidae (Diptera) from Ecuador. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 36, 425 - 431. https: // doi. org / 10.1093 / aesa / 36.3.425

Fluke, C. L. (1945) The Melanostomatini of the Neotropical Region (Diptera, Syrphidae). American Museum Novitates, 1272, 1 - 29.

Fluke, C. L. (1957) A study of male genitalia of the Melanostomatini (Diptera: Syrphidae). Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters, 46, 261 - 279.

Haarto, A. & Stahls, G. (2014) When mtDNA COI is misleading: congruent signal of ITS 2 molecular marker and morphology for North European Melanostoma Schiner, 1860 (Diptera, Syrphidae). ZooKeys, 431, 93 - 134. https: // doi. org / 10.3897 / ZooKeys. 431.7207

Huo, K. K. (2014) Spazigasteroides a new genus of China with black face and scutellum in the Syrphini (Diptera: Syrphidae). Zootaxa, 3755 (3), 230 - 240. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3755.3.2

Mengual, X., Miranda, G. F. G. & Thompson, F. C. (2018) Unraveling Ocyptamus and the Baccha legacy (Diptera: Syrphidae): redefinition of groups and new species descriptions. Zootaxa, 4461 (1), 1 - 44. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4461.1.1

Mengual, X. (2020) Phylogenetic relationships of the bacchine flower flies (Diptera: Syrphidae) based on molecular characters, with a description of a new species of Melanostoma (Schiner, 1860). Contributions to Zoology, 82 (2), 210 - 244. https: // doi. org / 10.1163 / 18759866 - 20191410

Miranda, G. F. G. & Moran, K. (2017) The female abdomen and genitalia of Syrphidae (Diptera). Insect Systematics & Evolution, 48, 157 - 201. https: // doi. org / 10.1163 / 1876312 X- 48022153

Montoya, A. L. & Wolff, M. (2020) Description of six new large species of Argentinomyia Lynch-Arribalzaga, 1891 and redescription of Talahua fervida (Fluke, 1945) (Diptera, Syrphidae, Syrphinae). ZooKeys, 929, 19 - 51. https: // doi. org / 10.3897 / zookeys. 929.37666

Ramage, T., Charlat, S. & Mengual, X. (2018) Flower flies (Diptera, Syrphidae) of French Polynesia, with the description of two new species. European Journal of Taxonomy, 448, 1 - 37. https: // doi. org / 10.5852 / ejt. 2018.448

Shatalkin, A. I. (1975) A taxonomic analysis of the hoverflies (Diptera, Syrphidae). Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie, 54, 894 - 909.

Thompson, F. C. (1999 a) A key to the genera of the flower flies (Diptera, Syrphidae) of the Neotropical Region including descriptions of new genera and species and a glossary of taxonomic terms used. Contributions on Entomology International, 3, 321 - 378.

Thompson, F. C., Rotheray, G. E. & Zumbado, M. A. (2010) Family Syrphidae. In: Brown, B. E. (Ed.), Manual of Diptera of Central America. NRC Press, Ottawa, pp. 763 - 792.

Thompson, F. C. & Skevington, J. H. (2014) Afrotropical flower flies (Diptera: Syrphidae). A new genus and species de Kenya, with a review of the melanostomine group of genera. Zootaxa, 3847 (1), 97 - 114. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3847.1.5

Vockeroth, J. R. (1990) Revision of the Nearctic species of Platycheirus (Diptera, Syrphidae). The Canadian Entomologist, 122, 659 - 766. https: // doi. org / 10.4039 / ENT 122659 - 7

Young, A. D., S. A. Marshall, & Skevington, J. H. (2016) Revision of Platycheirus Lepeletier and Serville (Diptera: Syrphidae) in the Nearctic north of Mexico. Zootaxa, 4082 (1), 1 - 317. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4082.1.1

Gallery Image

FIGURE 1. A. Illustration of the dorsal habitus of Argentinomyia testaceipes in the original description of Lynch Arribálzaga (1891: 269, Plate, Fig 4); B. Dorsal habitus of a female specimen photographed by X. Mengual; available online at: http:// syrphidae.myspecies.info/taxonomy/term/117.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 3. Detail of metasternum development: A. Metasternum highly reduced in Melanostoma; B. Metasternum entire, not reduced in Argentinomyia. Abbreviations: Mtst: Metasternum; Cx 3: Coxae 3.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 4. Differences in head morphology, colouration and pollinosity patterns, frontal view: A. Leucopodella sp. (♁); B. Argentinomyia longicornis (♀);C. Argentinomyia rugosonasa (♀);D. Argentinomyia jamaicensissp. nov. (♀);E. Argentinomyia testaceipes (♀); F. Argentinomyia tropica (♀); G. Argentinomyia nigrans (♀); H. Argentinomyia browni (♀); I. Argentinomyia crenulata (♀); J–K. Argentinomyia norrbomi sp. nov. (♁): J. lateral view, K. frontal view; L. Argentinomyia longicornis (♁), lateral view; M. Platycheirus (Carposcalis) (♁), frontal view; N. Platycheirus (Tuberculanostoma) (♁), lateral view. Scale bar: 5 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 5. Female postabdomen. A. Lateral view of Argentinomyia norrbomi sp. nov.; B. Posterior view of the abdominal apex of Argentinomyia occidentalis sp. nov.; C. Dorsal view of distended abdomen of Argentinomyia luculenta. Abbreviations: Ap: apodeme of epiproct; Cer = Cercus; Ep: Epiproct; Hp: Hypoproct; Scl: sclerotized area; Sper: Spermatheca; Tg: tergite. Scale bars: 0.05 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 6. Differences in antennae morphology, dorsal view: A. Argentinomyia luculenta (♀); B. Argentinomyia testaceipes (♀); C. Argentinomyia catabomba (♀); D–G. Talahua fervida (♁): D. Head, frontal view, E. Metacoxa pile tuft, ventral view, F. Scutellum emarginated, dorsal view, G. Genitalia, lateral view; H. Argentinomyia CR-18 (♁); I. Argentinomyia sagoti sp. nov. (♀); J. Metasternum of Melanostoma sp.; K. Scutellar pile of Argentinomyia rex; L. Antennal cavities broadly confluent of Xanthandrus sp. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 8. Differences in wing macula pattern, lateral view. A. Argentinomyia crenulata (♀); B. Argentinomyia sagoti sp. nov. (♁); C. Argentinomyia CR-18 (♁).

Gallery Image

FIGURE 9. Pattern of abdominal terga, dorsal view: A. Talahua fervida (♀); B. Argentinomyia norrbomi sp. nov. (♀); C. Triangular maculae in Argentinomyia nigrans (♀); D. Argentinomyia rugosonasa (♁); E. Argentinomyia belmira sp. nov. (♀); F. Lineal maculae in Argentinomyia lineata (♁); G. Oblique maculae in Argentinomyia longicornis (♀); H. Argentinomyia andina (♁), head frontal view; I. Argentinomyia currani (♁), abdomen lateral view. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 11. Argentinomyia agonis (Walker, 1849), male genitalia. A. Whole genitalia including epandrium, cercus and surstylus, lateral view; B. Epandrium, dorsal view; C. Hypandrium, ventral view.Abbreviations used in male genitalia structures are as follows: Ahp = apex of hypandrium (superior lobes); Cer = Cercus; Epd = Epandrium; Hyp = Hypandrium; Led = Aedeagal lobe; Sur = Surstyle. Scale bar: 0.05 mm. D–E. Natural habitus of male and female specimens in Puerto Villamil, Galapagos, Ecuador (iNaturalist catalogue number37254474; https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/37254474). Photo taken by ©Robert Siegel.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 12. Argentinomyia altissima (Fluke, 1945), male (CEUA 93080): A. Head, frontal view; B. Dorsal view; C. Lateral view. Female (CEUA 43354): D. Head, frontal view; E. Dorsal view; F. Lateral view. Scale bars: 5 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 13. Argentinomyia altissima (Fluke, 1945), male genitalia. A. Whole genitalia, lateral view; B. Epandrium, dorsal view; C. Hypandrium, ventral view. Scale bars: 1 mm. D–E. Natural habitus of a female specimen in Pumapaccha, Cuzco, Perú (iNaturalist catalogue number# 37168068; https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/37168068). Photo taken by ©Jared Shorma.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 14. Argentinomyia aurifacies sp. nov., male Holotype (USNM ENT 01443646): A. Head, frontal view; B. Dorsal view; C. Lateral view. Female (USNM ENT 00038431): D. Head, frontal view; E. Dorsal view; F. Lateral view. Scale bars: 5 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 18. Argentinomyia berthae (Lima, 1946), male Neotype (INPA–DIP 000095): A. Head, frontal view B. Dorsal view; C. Head, lateral view. Photo taken by ©Gil Felipe Miranda in Miranda (2017). Female (USNM ENT 01443843): D. Head, frontal view; E. Dorsal view; F. Lateral view; G. Posterodorsal view (USNM ENT01443843). Scale bars: each bar is equal to 1 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 22. Argentinomyia browni (Fluke, 1945), male (USNM ENT 00058849): A. Head, frontal view; B. Dorsal view; C. Lateral view. Female (USNM ENT 01443719): D. Head, frontal view; E. Dorsal view; F. Lateral view. Scale bars: 5 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 23. Argentinomyia browni (Fluke, 1945), male genitalia. A. Whole genitalia, lateral view; B. Epandrium, dorsal view; C. Hypandrium, ventral view. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 24. Argentinomyia catabomba (Williston, 1891), male (ECO–TAP–E 483): A. Head, frontal view; B. Dorsal view; C. Lateral view. Female (ECO–TAP–E 1715): D. Head, frontal view; E. Dorsal view; F. Lateral view (CNC DIPTERA 112220). Scale bars: 5 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 28. Argentinomyia currani (Fluke, 1937), male (USNM ENT 01406227): A. Head, frontal view; B. Detail of triangular maculae, dorsal view; C. Lateral view (Detail of black ring or smudge on the apical margin of metafemur). Female (USNM ENT 01406289): D. Head, frontal view; E. Detail of triangular maculae, dorsal view; F. Lateral view. Scale bars: 5 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 30. Argentinomyia fastigata (Fluke, 1945), male (USNM ENT 01406314): A. Head, frontal view; B. Dorsal view; C. Lateral view. Female (USNM ENT 01406314): D. Head, frontal view; E. Dorsal view (CEUA 103448); F. Lateral view (USNM ENT 01406314). Scale bars: 5 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 34. Argentinomyia humboldti sp. nov., female Holotype (CEUA 98063): A. Head, frontal view; B. Dorsal view; C. Lateral view. Scale bars: 5 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 35. Argentinomyia ivani sp. nov., male Holotype (CEUA 95457): A. Head, frontal view; B. Dorsal view; C. Lateral view; D. Posterior view, detail of maculae on 3rd and 4th terga. Scale bars: 5 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 53. Argentinomyia nigrans (Fluke, 1945), male (USNM ENT 01384670): A. Head, frontal view; B. Dorsal view; C. Lateral view. Female (USNM ENT 01406441): D. Head, frontal view; E. Dorsal view; F. Lateral view. Scale bars: 5 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 54. Argentinomyia nigrans (Fluke, 1945), male genitalia. A. Whole genitalia, lateral view; B. Epandrium, dorsal view; C. Hypandrium, ventral view. Scale bars: 1 mm. D–G. Rhysops funerea (Hull, 1949), male Holotype (CNC DIPTERA 169358). D. Latero–frontal view; E. Dorsal view; F. Lateral view; G. Label.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 55. Argentinomyia norrbomi sp. nov., male Holotype (USNM ENT 01443832): A. Head, frontal view; B. Dorsal view; C. Lateral view. Female (USNM ENT 01443831): D. Head, frontal view; E. Dorsal view; F. Lateral view. Scale bars: 5 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 56. Argentinomyia norrbomi sp. nov., male Holotype, genitalia A. Whole genitalia, lateral view; B. Epandrium, dorsal view; C. Hypandrium, ventral view. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 57. Argentinomyia occidentalis sp. nov., male Holotype (CEUA 47448): A. Head, frontal view; B. Dorsal view; C. Lateral view. Female (CEUA 47447): D. Head, frontal view; E. Dorsal view; F. Lateral view. Scale bars: 5 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 58. Argentinomyia occidentalis sp. nov., male genitalia. A. Whole genitalia, lateral view; B. Epandrium, dorsal view; C. Hypandrium, ventral view; D. Male genitalia, lateral view; E. Female abdomen, posterior view, detail of maculae on 4th and 5th tergum. Scale bars: 1,5 mm. F–G. Type localities. F. Páramo Santa Rica in Andes Antioquia, Colombia. Photo taken by ©Augusto L. Montoya; G. Páramo del Sol in Urrao Antioquia, Colombia. Photo taken by ©Esteban Domínguez.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 59. Argentinomyia opaca (Fluke, 1945), male (USNM ENT 00035708): A. Head, frontal view; B. Dorsal view; C. Lateral view. Female (USNM ENT 00035708): D. Head, frontal view; E. Dorsal view; F. Lateral view. Scale bars: 5 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 60. Argentinomyia opaca (Fluke, 1945), male genitalia. A. Whole genitalia, lateral view; B. Epandrium, dorsal view; C. Hypandrium, ventral view. Scale bars: 1 mm. D–E. Natural habitus of a female specimen at the Páramo ecosystem Santa Inés Belmira in Antioquia, Colombia: D. Dorsal view; E. Lateral view.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 61. Argentinomyia plaumanni sp. nov., male Holotype (USNM ENT 00036936): A. Head, frontal view; B. Dorsal view; C. Lateral view. Scale bars: 5 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 66. Argentinomyia praeusta (Loew, 1866), male genitalia. A. Whole genitalia, lateral view; B. Epandrium, dorsal view; C. Hypandrium, ventral view. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 70. Argentinomyia rugosonasa (Williston, 1891), male genitalia. A. Whole genitalia, lateral view; B. Epandrium, dorsal view; C. Hypandrium, ventral view. Scale bars: 1 mm. D. Natural habitus of a male specimen in El Calvario, Toluca, México (iNaturalist catalogue number 17119892; https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/17119892); E. Natural habitus of a female specimen in Toluca de Lerdo, México (iNaturalist catalogue number 8506135; https://www.inaturalist.org/ observations/8506135). Photos taken by ©Juan Carlos García Morales.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 71. Argentinomyia sagoti sp. nov., male Holotype (ECOSCE): A. Head, frontal view; B. Dorsal view; C. Lateral view. Female (ECOSCE 24470): D. Head, frontal view; E. Dorsal view; F. Lateral view. Scale bars: 5 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 80. Argentinomyia teresae sp. nov., male Holotype, genitalia. A. Whole genitalia, lateral view; B. Epandrium, dorsal view; C. Hypandrium, ventral view. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 83. Argentinomyia transversalis sp. nov., female. A. Head, frontal view; B. Dorsal view (USNMENT 00055996). C. Posterior view, detail of maculae pattern on abdomen; D. Lateral view (CEUA 87110). Scale bars: 5 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 84. Argentinomyia tropandeana sp. nov., male Holotype (CEUA 13210): A. Cabeza, Vista frontal; B. Dorsal view; C. Lateral view. Female (QCAZ 103714): D. Head, frontal view; E. Dorsal view; F. Lateral view. Scale bars: 5 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 86. Argentinomyia tropica (Curran, 1937), male (CEUA 93084): A. Head, frontal view; B. Dorsal view; C. Lateral view. Female (CEUA 69474): D. Head, frontal view; E. Dorsal view; F. Lateral view. Scale bars: 5 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 90. Geographical distribution of Argentinomyia species in the Tropical Andes.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Syrphidae