Dactyloscirus, Berlese, 1916
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5214.1.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4AF81E56-72B6-4C47-8642-EB7FAB9ADA6B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7387332 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B58780-6F4E-3653-FF00-C83E9CA92A22 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2022-11-30 12:34:09, last updated 2024-11-27 18:04:23) |
scientific name |
Dactyloscirus |
status |
|
Key to species of Dactyloscirus View in CoL
(Females)
1. Pedipalp with apophysis on joint of genu and tibiotarsus or arising distally on inner surface of genu................... 2
– Pedipalp without apophysis on joint of genu and tibiotarsus nor on genu......................................... 25
2. Hysterosoma with four pairs of median dorsal platelets.......... D. multiscutus Rocha, Rodrigues and Ferla, 2015 ( Brazil)
– Hysterosoma either with a single median dorsal shield or entirely soft, without platelets or shields..................... 3
3. Hysterosoma with single median dorsal shield.............................................................. 4
– Hysterosoma without median dorsal shield................................................................ 10
– Hysterosoma without dorsolateral shields.................................................................. 7
5. Median dorsal hysterosomal shield with two pairs of setae (c, d); basifemora I – IV with 5-5-3-1 setae.................. 1 1 .......................................................... D. philippinensis Corpuz-Raros, 1995 ( Philippines) View in CoL
– Median dorsal hysterosomal shield with three pairs of setae (c 1, d 1 and e 1); basifemora I–IV with 5-5-3-2 setae........... 6
6. Apophysis on joint of pedipalpal genu and tibiotarsus long and pointed, that on telofemur short and spoon-shaped................................................................................. D. mesonotus Shiba, 1986 ( Japan) View in CoL
– Apophysis on joint of pedipalpal genu and tibiotarsus long and blunt-tipped, that on telofemur long and blunt apically.......................................................... D. pseudophilippinensis Skvarla and Dowling, 2012 View in CoL ( USA)
7. Apophysis on joint of pedipalpal genu and tibiotarsus attenuate and pointed...................................... 8
– Apophysis on joint of pedipalpal genu and tibiotarsus bulbous................................................. 9
8. Median hysterosomal shield with three pairs of setae (c 1, d 1 and e 1); seta c 2 arising on soft cuticle outside median shield............................................................................ D. johnstoni Smiley, 1992 ( Mexico) View in CoL
– Median hysterosomal shield with four pairs of setae (c 1, c 2, d 1 and e 1); seta c 2 arising on median shield.............................................................................. D. illutus Inayatullah and Shahid, 1996 ( Pakistan) View in CoL
9. Median hysterosomal shield with two pairs of setae (c 1 and d 1); pedipalpal telofemur with a bulbous apophysis......................................................................... D. mansoni Smiley, 1992 View in CoL ( Mexico; Philippines)
– Median hysterosomal shield with three pairs of setae (c 1, d 1 and e 1); pedipalpal telofemur without apophysis.................................................................................. D. pataliputraensis Gupta, 1981 ( India) View in CoL
10. Hysterosoma with a pair of lateral shields................................................................ 11
– Hysterosoma without lateral shields..................................................................... 22
11. Coxa II with two setae................................................ D. poppi Smiley, 1992 View in CoL (unknown locality) *
– Coxa II with three setae............................................................................... 12
12. Pedipalpal telofemur with two apophyses, one narrowly bulbous and other disc-shaped.............................................................................................. D. condylus Den Heyer, 1979 View in CoL ( South Africa)
– Pedipalpal telofemur with only one broadly bulbous apophysis................................................ 13
13. Coxa IV with one or two setae......................................................................... 14
– Coxa IV with three setae.............................................................................. 16
14. Coxa IV with one seta; tibia I with two attenuate solenidia............... D. imbecillus Bashir and Afzal, 2006 ( Pakistan) View in CoL
– Coxa IV with two setae; tibia I with one attenuate solenidion................................................. 15
15. Dorsomedian hysterosomal seta f 1 shorter than h 1; palp genu with two sts... D. manzoori Bashir and Afzal, 2006 ( Pakistan) View in CoL – Dorsomedian hysterosomal seta f 1 longer than h 1; palp genu with three sts.. D. kahrorensis Bashir and Afzal, 2006 ( Pakistan) View in CoL
16. Pedipalpal tibiotarsus thick, almost straight and gradually tapered distally; apophysis on joint of pedipalpal genu and tibiotarsus small and narrowly bulbous............................................................................ 17
– Pedipalpal tibiotarsus thin, curved, and abruptly tapered from near base; apophysis on joint of pedipalpal genu and tibiotarsus large and apically pointed or bulbous.................................................................... 18
17. Basifemur IV with two sts; tibiae I-IV with 5-5-5-4 sts; setae g 4 longest of the genital setae....................................................................... D. ladangjagung Corpuz-Raros and Lit sp. nov. ( Indonesia: Sumatra)
– Basifemur IV with one sts; tibiae I-IV with 4-5-4-2 sts; setae g 3 longest of the genital setae.................................................................................................. D hoffmannae Swift, 1996 (Hawaii) View in CoL
18. Lateral hysterosomal shields small, less than twice as long as either setae c or c ................................... 1 2 ........................................................... D. inermis ( Tragardh, 1905) View in CoL ( Egypt; cosmopolitan)
– Lateral hysterosomal shields long, more than twice as long as either setae c 1 or c 2 ................................. 19
19. Hysterosomal seta h 1 1.25 times longer than f 1.................................... D. humuli Liang, 1986 View in CoL (NE China)
– Hysterosomal setae f 1 and h 1 equal in length............................................................... 20
20. Genital seta g 3 longest, 1.5 – 1.7 times the length of g 2 and g 4, and more than twice g1 ...... D. smileyi Swift, 1996 (Hawaii) View in CoL
– Genital seta g 4 longest of the genital setae................................................................ 21
– Chelicera stout, basal half inflated to four times its distal width; length of lateral hysterosomal shields only 2/3 of setal distance c 1 –c 2; hysterosomal setae f 1 and h 1 2.25 times as long as setae c 1 –e 1 ................................................................................................ D. sumatranus Corpuz-Raros and Naredo sp. nov. ( Indonesia)
22. Apophysis on joint of pedipalpal genu and tibiotarsus long and gradually tapered to a fine point................................................................... D. machairodus ( Oudemans, 1922) View in CoL ( Indonesia: Sumatra, Philippines)
– Apophysis on joint of pedipalpal genu and tibiotarsus short and bulbous........................................ 23
23. Pedipalpal genu with two apophyses, one bulbous and the other disc-like. D. discocondylus Corpuz-Raros, 2008 ( Philippines) View in CoL
– Pedipalpal genu with one bulbous apophysis.............................................................. 24
24. Basal pair of adoral setae very long, more than four times the length of distal pair; apophysis of pedipalpal telofemur about as long as width of this segment; genital seta g 4 twice as long as setae g 1 –g 3 .... D. rosarioae Corpuz-Raros, 1995 ( Philippines) View in CoL
– Basal pair of adoral setae not elongated, subequal to distal pair; apophysis of pedipalpal telofemur short, less than width of this segment; genital setae g 4 slightly longer than setae g 1 –g 3 .................. D. agricolus Corpuz-Raros, 1995 ( Philippines) View in CoL
25. Median dorsal hysterosomal shield present................................................................ 26
– Median dorsal hysterosomal shield absent................................................................ 27
26. Dorsal hysterosomal shield bear three pairs of setae (c, d and e)............................................... 1 1 1 ............................................... D. eupaloides Berlese, 1916 ( Argentina, North America, Europe) 1 2 1 1
– Dorsal hysterosomal shield bear four pairs of setae (c, c, d, and e)..... D. minys Inayatullah and Shahid, 1996 ( Pakistan) View in CoL
27. Pedipalpal claw trifid; setal formula of coxae II–IV 3-3-3.................. D. trifidus Corpuz-Raros, 2008 ( Philippines) View in CoL
– Pedipalpal claw entire, unbranched; setal formula of coxae II–IV not as above................................... 28
28. Coxa I with two setae..................................................... D. bengalensis Gupta, 1992 ( India) View in CoL
– Coxa I with three setae............................................................................... 29
29. Coxal II–IV setal formula 1-3-2.................................... D. orsi Inayatullah and Shahid, 1996 ( Pakistan) View in CoL
– Coxal II–IV setal formula 2-3-1.............................. D. saopauloensis Den Heyer and Castro, 2012 ( Brazil) View in CoL
Berlese, A. (1916) Centuria secunda di Acari nuovi. Redia, 12 (1), 125 - 177.
Corpuz-Raros, L. A. (1995) Philippine predatory mites of the family Cunaxidae. 2. Genera Armascirus Den Heyer and Dactyloscirus Berlese. The Philippine Agriculturist, 78 (2), 159 - 173.
Corpuz-Raros, L. A. (2008) Additional species of Cunaxidae and first report of the subfamily Neobonzinae (Cunaxidae, Acari). Asia Life Sciences, 17 (1), 71 - 89
Den Heyer, J. (1979) A new cunaxid subfamily and the neotype designation of Cunaxoides croceus (Koch, 1838) (Prostigmata: Acari). Acarologia, 20 (3), 338 - 350.
Den Heyer, J. & de Castro, T. M. M. G. (2012) New Neotropical cunaxine species (Acari: Prostigmata: Bdelloidea: Cunaxidae). Zootaxa, 3265, 22 - 42. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3265.1.2
Gupta, S. K. (1981) Some soil prostigmatid mites (Acarina) from Bihar. Progress in Soil Biology and Ecology in India. USA Technical Series, No. 39, 93 - 99.
Gupta, S. K. (1992) Arachnida: Plant mites (Acari). In: Shaha, S. K., (Ed.), State Fauna Series, Fauna of West Bengal, Part 3. Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta, India, pp. 61 - 211.
Inayatullah, S. M. & Shahid, M. (1996) Three new predatory mites of the genus Dactyloscirus Berlese (Acarina; Cunaxidae) from Pakistan. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 12 (5), 547 - 557.
Oudemans, A. C. (1922) Acarologische Aanteekeningen LXVIII (Acari van Sumatra). Entomologische Berichten, 6 (127), 108 - 111.
Shiba, M. (1986). The mites of family Cunaxidae (Acarina: Prostigmata) in Japan II. Genera Armascirus Den Heyer and Dactyloscirus Berlese. Matsuyama Shinonome Tanki Daigaku Kenyu Ronso, 17, 151 - 163.
Skvarla, M. A. & Dowling, A. P. G. (2012) Some new armascirine cunaxids (Acari: Prostigmata: Cunaxidae) from the Eastern United States. Zootaxa, 3194, 1 - 34. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3194.1.1
Smiley, R. L. (1992) The Predatory Mite Family Cunaxidae (Acari) of the World with a New Classification. Indira Publishing House, West Bloomington, Michigan. 356 pp.
Tragardh, I. (1905) Acariden aus Aegypten und dem Sudan. Results of the Swedish Expedition to Egypt and the White Nile, 1901, Part 2, 5.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SubOrder |
Prostigmata |
Family |