Himantariella scutellaris Brolemann, 1926
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5278.1.7 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C3B2A583-609E-437D-B6F4-608EC4E24E2E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7900391 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B4C176-FFE3-FC28-FF39-ED6BF817FD2C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Himantariella scutellaris Brolemann, 1926 |
status |
|
Himantariella scutellaris Brolemann, 1926 View in CoL
Himantariella scutellaris Brolemann, 1926 View in CoL Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Toulouse 54: 257–259, figs. 24–27.
Himantariella scutellaris: Attems, 1929 In View in CoL : Myriapoda: 1. Geophilomorpha View in CoL . p. 34 (in key), 35, figs. 49–50.
Himantariella scutellaris: Brolemann, 1930 View in CoL In: Faune de France. 25: p. 54 (in key), 65–67, figs. 37–40.
Himantariella scutellaris: Căpuşe, 1975 View in CoL Trav. Inst. Spéol. «Emile Racovitza» 14: 38 (in key only).
Himantariella scutellaris: Demange, 1981 View in CoL In: Les Mille-pattes Myriapodes. Généralités, Morphologie, Ecologie, Ethologie. Détermination des espèces de France. p. 225 (in key), 226.
Himantariella scutellaris: Geoffroy & Iorio, 2009 View in CoL Soil Org. 81: 682 (list only).
Himantariella scutellaris: Bonato & Minelli, 2014 View in CoL Zootaxa 3770(1): 14 (list only).
Himantariella scutellaris: Iorio, 2014 View in CoL Mém. Soc. Linn. Bordeaux 14: 216.
Himantariella scutellaris: Iorio, 2021 View in CoL Bull. Soc. entomol. Fr. 126: 135–136, figs. 6, 27, 31, 51.
Material examined. Spain —Girona: Beuda, Can Grau , Southern side of El Mont/ Alta Garrotxa : 1♁, 22/03/2019, 394 m, under an olive tree stump near abandoned crop fields (31T 474599 4676890); 1♀, 18/03/2020, 390 m, under a stone near abandoned crop fields (31T 474594 4676964) . Barcelona: Fogars de Montclús, El Vallès Oriental, Santa Fe de Montseny : 1♀ (E. Vives leg., CRBA-4496 col.), 15/05/1972, in a beech forest (E. Vives pers. comm.) (31T 455 4625). Terrassa, El Vallès Occidental : 1♀ (J. Brugueras leg., CRBA-4495 col.), 27/04/1976, probably in an anthropic environment (31T 41 460). Asturias: Gijón, between Cataluña street and Río Eo street: 1♁, 29/09/2020, 15 m, moving on the pavement at night in the city centre (30T 283992 4822387); Street Carlos Marx near the urban park Doctor Juan Negrín : 1♀, 26/11/2021, 4 m, moving on the pavement at night in the city centre (30T 284071 4823750). Oviedo, Seminario Metropolitano : 1♁ / 1♁ subadult, 20/12/2021 and 1♁ / 1♀, 26/12/2021, 265 m, under a stone stuck in the ground in a garden (30T 269292 4804250): 1♁, 26/12/2021, 265 m, moving on the pavement at night in an urban area and 2♁ / 2♀, 02/12/2022, 265 m, under a stone stuck in the ground in a garden (30T 269292 4804250) .
Morphological remarks
Iberian specimens had an orange head and body, sometimes with the distal end of the trunk brownish (in vivo) ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ). Males with 113–119 LP, body length 115–175 mm, minimum body width 1–2.5 mm, maximum body width 2–4 mm. A subadult male with 113 LP, body length 83 mm, minimum body width 1.5 mm, maximum body width 2 mm. Females with 117–121 LP, body length 121–202 mm, minimum body width 1.5–2.5 mm, maximum body width 2–3.5 mm. Second maxillar coxosternite with a median notch and angulate backwards ( Fig. 3A View FIGURE 3 ). Labrum with a median fissure or notch and teeth both on the central and the lateral pieces ( Fig. 3B View FIGURE 3 ). Males with 16–19 labral teeth, 9–12 projections on the pectinate lamellae and 7–9 teeth on the dentate lamellae. Subadult male with 10 labral teeth, 8 projections on the pectinate lamellae and 6 teeth on the dentate lamellae. Females with 14–18 labral teeth, 9–12 projections on the pectinate lamellae and 7–10 teeth on the dentate lamellae. Cephalic plate wider than long and with a transverse suture. Forcipular coxosternite wider than long, coxopleural sutures diverging anteriorly, chitin-lines reaching the condyles and no denticles on forcipules ( Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4 ). Trunk with principal paratergites, sometimes hidden under the lateral edges of metatergites ( Fig. 4B View FIGURE 4 ). Pore-fields extending from metasternite 2 to the penultimate. Shape of pore-fields variable along the trunk ( Fig. 4D–F View FIGURE 4 ): small and circular in the anterior part, oval in the intermediate region and slightly elliptical in the posterior part. No other fossae or specific structures on metasternites. Ultimate tergite with sutural sulci between pretergite and intercalary pleurites. Ultimate metasternite trapezoidal, slightly wider than long and with a distinct mid-longitudinal groove, both in males and females ( Fig. 4C View FIGURE 4 ). Ultimate coxopleura with many scattered pores, both in the dorsal and the ventral side. Ultimate leg pair slightly swollen in both sexes and as long as the penultimate.
Morphology of Iberian specimens fits former descriptions of previous records from the eastern Pyrenees, except the number of labral teeth and pieces on pectinate and dentate lamellae, which is slightly higher than previously reported ( Table I View TABLE I ) or the separation between mid-labral teeth, which is slightly wider in certain specimens ( Fig. 3B View FIGURE 3 ). These findings make it possible to provide updated morphological ranges on the morphology of H. scutellaris : 113–121 leg pairs, body length 60–83 mm in pre-adult specimens and 115–202 mm in adults, minimum body width 1–2.5 mm, maximum body width 2–4.2 mm, 10–19 labral teeth (frequently 16 or 18), 8–12 projections on the pectinate lamellae (frequently 9 or 10) and 6–10 teeth on the dentate lamellae (frequently 7 to 9). Worth noting the utility of oval pore-fields as a diagnostic character, since other Himantariidae genera reported from the Iberian Peninsula and the Pyrenees lack this feature.
Ecological remarks
Iberian specimens of H. scutellaris were detected in urban areas, crop fields and forests ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). Worth noting that specimens from the Cantabric Region were only found in urban green areas such as gardens or near parks ( Fig. 1C–D View FIGURE 1 ). In the Iberian Peninsula, the species was detected from March to December in areas located between 4–394 metres above the sea level. Records belong to areas with a milder climate due to the nearby sea or mountains, with less than 30ºC most of the year, temperatures below zero in the colder months and abundant rainfall, even in the driest season. Regarding the edaphic factors, Iberian specimens were found in soils with high humidity and acidic or neutral pH. Nocturnal activity could be recorded twice in the city centre of Gijón and once in Oviedo (recording available on https://youtu.be/simBiJcIhuo). According to previous records and new data from the Iberian Peninsula, it is possible to summarise that H. scutellaris is present in open areas, both in mountainous and urban environments, almost from the sea level to 1025 metres, from spring to winter. Although the species was initially considered a Pyrenean endemism, its current distribution ranges from the northwestern to the northeastern Iberian Peninsula, including the Cantabric Region, the Prelitoral Mountain Range, the Spanish pre-Pyrenean area and the French Pyrenees ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ).
Locality | S | LP | BL | BW | LT | PL | DL | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vernet-les-Bains | J | 121 | 60 | 1.5 | - | - | - | Broleman (1926) |
Oviedo | ♁* | 113 | 83 | 1.5-2 | 5+5 | 8 | 6 | Present work |
Perpignan | ♁ | 113 | - | - | 13 | 12 | 6 | Iorio (2014, 2021) |
Saint Martin du Canigou | ♁ | 113 | 152 | 3.8 | 10 | 11 | 7/8 | Broleman (1926) |
Oviedo | ♁ | 115 | 126 | 1.2-3 | 8+8 | 9 | 7 | Present work |
Beuda | ♁ | 117 | 115 | 2-3 | 8+8 | 10 | 9 | Present work |
Gijón | ♁ | 117 | 117 | 2-3 | 9+9 | 10 | 8/9 | Present work |
Oviedo | ♁ | 117 | 130 | 1-3 | 9+9 | 10/9 | 8 | Present work |
Oviedo | ♁ | 117 | 147 | 2-3 | 9+9 | 10 | 9/8 | Present work |
Oviedo | ♁ | 117 | 175 | 2-4 | 9+10 | 11 | 8 | Present work |
Oviedo | ♁ | 119 | 175 | 2.5-3 | 9+9 | 9/12 | 9/7 | Present work |
Perpignan | ♀ | 117 | 144 | 4.2 | 16 | 10-11 | 6 | Iorio (2014, 2021) |
Fogars de Montclús | ♀ | 117 | 155 | 2-3 | 9+9 | 9 | 7 | Present work |
Gijón | ♀ | 119 | 126 | 2.5 | 8+9 | 11/12 | 7/9 | Present work |
Oviedo | ♀ | 119 | 162 | 2-3.5 | 9+8 | 10 | 8/7 | Present work |
Terrassa | ♀ | 119 | 164 | 2-3.5 | 8+9 | 9-10 | 8-9 | Present work |
Oviedo | ♀ | 119 | 166 | 2-3 | 7+7 | 10 | 8/9 | Present work |
Oviedo | ♀ | 119 | 202 | 2-3 | 11+7 | 12 | 10/9 | Present work |
Beuda | ♀ | 121 | 121 | 1.5-2 | 9+6 | 9 | 9/7 | Present work |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Himantariella scutellaris Brolemann, 1926
Cabanillas, David, Serra, Antoni, López-Alonso, Ricardo, Carbonell, Rafael & Robla, Jairo 2023 |
Himantariella scutellaris:
Iorio 2021 |
Himantariella scutellaris:
Bonato & Minelli 2014 |
Himantariella scutellaris:
Iorio 2014 |
Himantariella scutellaris:
Geoffroy & Iorio 2009 |
Himantariella scutellaris:
Demange 1981 |
Himantariella scutellaris: Căpuşe, 1975
Capuse 1975 |
Himantariella scutellaris:
Brolemann 1930 |
Himantariella scutellaris
: Attems 1929 |
Himantariella scutellaris
Brolemann 1926 |