Brachyscelus macrocephalus Stephensen, 1925

Zeidler, Wolfgang, 2021, A review of the hyperiidean amphipod family Brachyscelidae Stephensen, 1923 (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Hyperiidea), Zootaxa 5026 (3), pp. 405-439 : 419-422

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5026.3.4

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:11E41F28-9FA8-4057-93E2-59D6538DA631

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B487A3-FFAB-460E-F3A0-F9D2FF497612

treatment provided by

Plazi (2021-08-26 15:02:32, last updated by GgImagineBatch 2021-08-27 18:34:46)

scientific name

Brachyscelus macrocephalus Stephensen, 1925
status

 

Brachyscelus macrocephalus Stephensen, 1925

( Figs 7–8)

Brachyscelus macrocephalus Stephensen, 1925: 177–179 , 230 (table), fig. 66.— Shoemaker 1945: 243.— Shoemaker 1948: 14.— Hure et al. 1969: 603 & 605 (tables).— Thurston 1976: 388–389 (table), 434.— Shulenberger 1977: 379 (table).— Vinogradov et al. 1982 /1996: 396/489 (key), 400–401/495–496, fig. 216.—Vinogradov 1990: 77, 95 (table).— Vinogradov 1991: 261 (table).— Zeidler 1992: 115 (key).— Vinogradov 1999: 1193 (key).— Gasca & Shih 2001: 498.— Escobar-Briones et al. 2002: 367 (list).— Vinogradov et al. 2004: 16, 24 (table).— Zelickman 2005: xvii (list).— Gasca et al. 2009: 1497 (table).— Burridge et al. 2016: passim.— Zeidler 2016: 47 (key).— Espinosa-Leal et al. 2021b: passim.

Type material. There are several syntypes (approx. 36 specimens) of Brachyscelus macrocephalus in the NHMD, in alcohol. The type locality is the Mediterranean Sea, from several locations, mainly from the eastern basin; Thor stations 39, 43, 161, 277, 297, 298, 339, 340, 341, 385 ( NHMD- 87114–24; formerly CRU-9618–28 respectively). Stephensen (1925) illustrates a male and female (about 5 mm) from station 277 [33°20’N 27°30’E], 132 metres of wire out (mw), 6 April 1911; partly dissected and labelled “Type” ( NHMD- 85006; formerly CRU-7162).

Material examined. Type material of B. macrocephalus as detailed above and the following. In NHMD: N.E. Atlantic, off Morocco, Dana station 4016 [28°07’N 15°24’W], 50 mw, one female (233044). Tropical W. Indian Ocean, near Maldives, Dana station 3918 v [00°35’N 66°09’E], 50 mw and Dana station 3920 x [01°12’S 62°19’E], 50 mw, numerous specimens, mostly females (233042 & 2233043). In SAM: S.W. Indian Ocean, off South Africa, Meiring Naude station SM 27 [28°S 34°45.4’E], 212–0 m, one female and station SM 30 [28°03.7’S 32°42’E], 212–0 m, 2 females, 2 males. In SAMA: Tasman Sea, off eastern Australia [30°17’S 153°16’30”E], 25 m, one female (C5258).

Diagnosis. Body length up to 5.0 mm for females and 6.0 mm for males. Head relatively large and rounded in both sexes, depth about twice length in females, 1.5 x length in males. Antennae 2 of males; length of terminal article about one-quarter preceding one. Gnathopod 1 basis slightly shorter and more robust than for G2, with inflated anterior margin in females, with distinct pocket for A 2 in males; carpus with antero-distal corner produced into small lobe, partly overlapping propodus, especially in males; carpal process with large teeth, with minor serrations; postero-distal corner of propodus armed with one large tooth followed by two smaller teeth with small serrations in-between; dactylus relatively sharp, length 0.4–0.5 x propodus (longer in females). Gnathopod 2 similar to G1 but basis without pocket and antero-distal corner of carpus barely produced. Pereopods 3 & 4 morphologically similar, P4 marginally longer than P3; merus slightly inflated anteriorly, length about 0.4 x basis; carpus equal in length to merus; propodus 1.5 x carpus length for P 3 in females, 1.3 x in males and about 2 x carpus length for P 4 in females, about 1.5 x in males, posterior margin slightly serrated. Pereopod 5 similar in length to P6; basis oval-shaped, length about 1.5 x maximum width, slightly more narrow in males, antero-distal margin without lobe; merus about 0.3 x basis length, slightly shorter than carpus, anterior margin with or without slight serrations; propodus about 1.5 x carpus length in females, 1.2 x in males; dactylus relatively short, slightly more than 0.2 x propodus. Pereopod 6 basis length 1.7 x maximum width for females, 1.5 x for males, anterior margin straight, antero-distal lobe relatively broad with rounded distal margin produced slightly beyond ischium; posterior margin with distinct bulge proximally tapering gradually to minor rounded lobe distally, overlapping ischium; merus about 0.3 x basis length, about 1.5 x carpus; propodus about 1.6 x carpus length; anterior margin of merus, carpus and propodus with small serrations; dactylus relatively long, about 0.4 x propodus. Pereopod 7 basis with posterior margin inflated proximally, more narrow in females, almost 2 x width, only about 1.5 x in males, slightly longer than remaining articles combined; merus slightly longer than carpus; propodus slightly shorter than carpus, with complex projections on antero-distal corner; dactylus hook-shaped, partly retractile. Uropod 1 endopod slightly longer than peduncle and exopod. Uropod 2 endopod slightly longer than peduncle, about 1.4 x exopod or slightly longer. Uropod 3 endopod about 3.0 x peduncle length, marginally longer than exopod, broadened distally, without distinct excavation terminally on inner margin. Rami of all uropods with serrated margins. Double urosomite about 1.6 x wider than long. Telson slightly shorter than width at base, apex rounded.

Remarks. This is one of the smallest species of Brachyscelus with records of ovigerous females at about 3.0 mm long ( Stephensen 1925). It is most similar to B. globiceps as discussed under that species.

Distribution. A relatively rare species, known from a few isolated records, mainly from tropical regions, from all of the world’s oceans. In the Mediterranean Sea it is most common in the eastern basin. In the Atlantic it has been recorded from near the Canary and Cape Verde Islands in the north and the tropical western part from Cuba to the Gulf of Mexico. In the Pacific it has been found in the Northern Central Gyre ( Shulenberger 1977) and off Chile and Peru, with one record from the Tasman Sea (see Material examined). Specimens from near the Maldives and off South Africa (see Material examined) are new records for the Indian Ocean. Most records are from near surface waters.

Burridge, A. K., Tump, M., Vonk, R., Goetze, E. & Peijnenburg, K. T. C. A. (2016) Diversity and distribution of hyperiid amphipods along a latitudinal transect in the Atlantic Ocean. Progress in Oceanography, 12 pp. [Available on line 8 September 2016.] https: // doi. org / 10.1016 / j. pocean. 2016.08.003

Escobar-Briones, E., Winfield, I., Ortiz, M., Gasca, R. & Suarez, E. (2002) Chapter 17. Amphipoda .. In: Llorente-Bousquets, J. & Morrone, J. J. (Eds.), Biodiversidad, taxonomia y biogeografia de artropodos de Mexico: Hacia una sintesis de su conocimiento. Volumen III. Comision Nacional para el conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad / Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. Bayer, Mexico, pp. 341 - 371.

Espinosa-Leal, L., Medellin-Mora, J., Corredor-Acosta, A. & Escribano, R. (2021 b) The community structure of hyperiid amphipods associated with two seamount regions in the South-east Pacific. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 1 - 12. https: // doi. org / 10.1017 / s 0025315420001344

Gasca, R. & Shih, C. - T. (2001) Hyperiid amphipods from surface waters of the western Caribbean Sea (1991). Crustaceana, 74 (5), 489 - 499. https: // doi. org / 10.1163 / 156854001750243063

Gasca, R., Manzanilla, H. & Suarez-Morales, E. (2009) Distribution of hyperiid amphipods (Crustacea) of the southern Gulf of Mexico, summer and winter, 1991. Journal of Plankton Research, 31 (12), 1493 - 1504. https: // doi. org / 10.1093 / plankt / fbp 096

Hure, J., Scotto di Carlo, B. & Basile, A. (1969) Comparazione tra lo Zooplancton del Golfo di Napoli e dell'Adriatico Meridionale presso Dubrovnik, II: Amphipoda (Hyperiidea). Pubblicazioni della Stazione Zoologica di Napoli, 37, 599 - 609.

Shoemaker, C. R. (1945) The Amphipoda of the Bermuda Oceanographic Expeditions, 1929 - 1931. Zoologica, New York, 30 (4), 185 - 266.

Shoemaker, C. R. (1948) The Amphipoda of the Smithsonian-Roebling Expedition to Cuba in 1937. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 110, 1 - 15.

Shulenberger, E. (1977) Hyperiid amphipods from the zooplankton community of the North Pacific Central Gyre. Marine Biology, 42, 375 - 385. https: // doi. org / 10.1007 / BF 00402200

Stephensen, K. (1925) Hyperiidea-Amphipoda (Part 3: Lycaeopsidae, Pronoidae, Lycaeidae, Brachyscelidae, Oxycephalidae, Parascelidae, Platyscelidae). Report on the Danish Oceanographical Expeditions 1908 - 10 to the Mediterranean and Adjacent Seas, 2 (Biology-D 5), 151 - 252.

Thurston, M. H. (1976) The vertical distribution and diurnal migration of the Crustacea Amphipoda collected during the SOND Cruise, 1965. II. The Hyperiidea and general discussion. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 56, 383 - 470. https: // doi. org / 10.1017 / S 0025315400018981

Vinogradov, M. E., Volkov, A. F. & Semenova, T. N. (1982) Amfipody-Giperiidy (Amphipoda: Hyperiidea) Mirovogo Okeanea. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Opredeliteli po Faune SSSR No. 132. Leningrad, 492 pp. [In Russian]

Vinogradov, G. M. (1991) Hyperiid amphipods in the eastern part of the South Pacific gyre. Marine Biology, 109 (2), 259 - 265. https: // doi. org / 10.1007 / BF 01319394

Vinogradov, G. M. (1999) Amphipoda. In: Boltovskoy, D. (Ed.), South Atlantic Zooplankton. Vol. 2. Backhuys, Leiden, pp. 1141 - 1240.

Vinogradov, G. M., Hernandez, F., Tejera, E. & Leon, M. E. (2004) Pelagic amphipods from the Cape Verde Islands (TFMCBM / 98 cruise, Macaronesia 2000 - project). Vieraea, 32, 7 - 27.

Zeidler, W. (1992) Hyperiid amphipods (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Hyperiidea) collected recently from eastern Australian waters. Records of the Australian Museum, 44 (1), 85 - 133. https: // doi. org / 10.3853 / j. 0067 - 1975.44.1992.29

Zeidler, W. (2016) A review of the families and genera of the superfamily PLATYSCELOIDEA Bowman & Gruner, 1973 (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Hyperiidea), together with keys to the families, genera and species. Zootaxa, 4192 (1), 1 - 136. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4192.1.1

Zelickman, E. A. (2005) Amphipoda: Hyperiidea of Israel. A morphological atlas. Fauna Palaestina. Crustacea 1. The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Jerusalem, 440 pp.

SAM

South African Museum

SAMA

South Australia Museum

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Malacostraca

Order

Amphipoda

Family

Brachyscelidae

Genus

Brachyscelus