SCIADOCERINAE (Schmitz, 1929)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/0003-0090-423.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4612825 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B187A8-FFCA-FFB2-FF15-3BB17EE4F93D |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
SCIADOCERINAE |
status |
|
SUBFAMILY SCIADOCERINAE View in CoL
DIAGNOSIS: Pretarsus with empodium either minute or completely lost. Acrostichals long, in 1–3 rows (except Ulrichophora ). Plesiomorphic features include: cells cup and bm present (closed); frons without median sulcus; tip of R 4+5 fully fused to C; sternites fully developed in both sexes.
COMMENTS: There are two living sister species of Sciadocerinae , Archiphora patagonica Schmitz in Chile and Sciadocera rufomaculata White in Austalia and New Zealand. Their close relationship is indicated by characters 14 and 15 (table 4): stem of M 1 -M 2 lost or spectral, and the basal flagellomere is enlarged in males (it is much larger in Archiphora ). A Baltic amber (Eocene) species was transferred to its own genus, Hennigophora robusta (Meunier) , by Brown (2007a), into which I am also transferring Archiphora pria Grimaldi and Cumming (see below). Two other genera of sciadocerines occur in Baltic amber: Ulrichophora Brown (monotypic: lobata ), and Eosciadocera Hong (two species). I have not examined Ulrichophora , but the fly has some distinctive features, the most striking being the numerous acrostichals not arranged into one or a few rows ( Brown, 2007a). Eosciadocera setosa and E. pauciseta , n. sp., are striking because of their large size, nearly 7 mm in body length.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.