Portaratrum holdichi, Bird, 2014
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2014.896489 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B087EC-0262-3A75-03E1-D39600E6FBF5 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Portaratrum holdichi |
status |
sp. nov. |
Portaratrum holdichi View in CoL n. sp.
Leptognathia View in CoL (?) zezinae Kudinova-Pasternak, 1973 View in CoL ; Holdich and Bird (1985): 444, Table 1 [probable synonym]
Material examined
Holotype ovigerous female (2.9 mm), BIOGAS Stn 3282 [IINH 27881]; Iceland Basin [slope], 62.48° N 16.16° E, 1810 m, 2.54°C. GoogleMaps
Allotype preparatory male (2.6 mm), BIOGAS Stn 3282 [IINH 27882], details as for holotype.
Paratypes: nine non-ov. ♀♀, four prep. ♂♂, BIOICE Stn 2836 [IINH 27883]; one non-ov. ♀, BIOICE Stn 2859 [IINH27884]; four non-ov. ♀♀, BIOICE Stn 2860 [IINH 27885]; one non-ov. ♀, BIOICE Stn 2864 [IINH 27886]; one prep. ♂, BIOICE Stn 3069 [IINH 27887]; one non-ov. ♀, two ov. ♀♀, one prep. ♂, BIOICE Stn 3624 [IINH 27888]; nine non-ov. ♀♀ (one dissected on microslides), two ov. ♀♀, one prep. ♂, BIOICE Stn 3282 [IINH 27889]; one ov. ♀, BIOICE Stn 3504 [IINH 27900]; one non-ov. ♀, one ov. ♀, BIOICE Stn 3509 [IINH 27901]; one?non-ov. ♀, BIOICE Stn 3510 [IINH 27902]; one manca-III, two non-ov. ♀♀, one ov. ♀, two post-ov. ♀♀, eleven prep. ♂♂ (one partly dissected on microslide), BIOICE Stn 3522 [IINH 27903]; six non-ov. ♀♀, one ov. ♀, ten prep. ♂♂, BIOICE Stn 3524 [IINH 27904] .
Other material (examined 1982–1989): two non-ov. ♀♀, BIOGAS-III Stn DS 36; one non-ov. ♀, BIOGAS-IV Stn DS 64; one non-ov. ♀, BIOGAS-VI Stn DS 75; five non-ov. ♀♀, BIOGAS-VI Stn DS 86; one non-ov. ♀, BIOGAS-VI Stn DS 87; one non-ov. ♀, BIOGAS-XI Stn KG 212; one ov. ♀, INCAL Stn CP 02; one non-ov. ♀, INCAL Stn CP 03; two non-ov. ♀♀, INCAL Stn CP 04; four non-ov. ♀♀, INCAL Stn CP 07; one non-ov. ♀, one ov. ♀, one prep. ♂, INCAL Stn CP 08; four non-ov. ♀♀, two prep. ♂♂, INCAL Stn DS 01; two non-ov. ♀♀, INCAL Stn DS 02; three non-ov. ♀♀, INCAL Stn DS 05; nine non-ov. ♀♀, three prep. ♂♂, INCAL Stn DS 06; one prep. ♂, INCAL Stn DS 08; two non-ov. ♀♀, one prep. ♂, INCAL Stn DS 09; one manca-III, INCAL Stn KR 03; one non-ov. ♀, INCAL Stn KR 06; one non-ov. ♀, INCAL Stn ØS 01; three non-ov. ♀♀, INCAL Stn WS 02; one non-ov. ♀, IOS Stn 10111#8; two non-ov. ♀♀, POLYGAS Stn DS 15; two non-ov. ♀♀, POLYGAS Stn DS 20; one non-ov. ♀, one ov. ♀, SMBA ES4 ; 28 non-ov. ♀♀, one ov. ♀, three prep. ♂♂, six indet. (damaged/incomplete), SMBA Stn ES 10; four non-ov. ♀♀, one manca- III, SMBA Stn ES 34; one non-ov. ♀, SMBA Stn ES 56; one manca-III, one non-ov. ♀, SMBA Stn ES 105; one non-ov. ♀, SMBA Stn ES 118; three non-ov. ♀♀, one indet., SMBA Stn ES 135; three non-ov. ♀♀, one post-ov. ♀, SMBA Stn ES 137; two non-ov. ♀♀, one post-ov. ♀, SMBA Stn ES 143; three non-ov. ♀♀, SMBA Stn ES 147; one indet., SMBA Stn ES 172; two non-ov. ♀♀, SMBA Stn ES 180; nine non-ov. ♀♀, one ov. ♀, one prep. ♂, SMBA Stn ES 185; one non-ov. ♀, SMBA Stn ES 190; three non-ov. ♀♀, SMBA Stn ES 204; one non-ov. ♀, SMBA Stn ES 207; one manca-III, one non-ov. ♀, SMBA Stn SBC48; one ov. ♀, SMBA Stn SBC50; one manca-II, one non-ov. ♀, SMBA Stn SBC51; one manca-III, three non-ov. ♀♀, SMBA Stn SBC60; two non-ov. ♀♀, SMBA Stn SBC61; three manca-III, two non-ov. ♀♀, SMBA Stn SBC68; one manca-III, SMBA Stn SBC150; three manca-II, SMBA Stn SBC262; one non-ov. ♀, SMBA Stn SBC275 .
Etymology
In honour of my former supervisor in the Department of Zoology, Nottingham University, and principal contributor to the renewed study of Tanaidacea in Britain during the late 1970s and early 1980s, Dr David Holdich DSc.
Type locality
Bathyal Iceland Basin ca. 1500–2100 m.
Diagnosis
Female: with cheliped basis with anterior mass clearly longer than posterior lobe; fixed finger with single distal tooth on incisive margin. Pereopods 1–3 propodus inferior margin smooth. Uropod exopod two-segmented, distal segment much smaller than proximal. Preparatory male pleon slightly longer than in female, wider than pereon. Antennule article-1 2.0 times ltb. Pleopod rami with nine distal setae.
Description
Female (ovigerous, post-ovigerous): habitus ( Figure 6A View Figure 6 ) fairly slender, 6.9 times ltb; length 1.9–3.3 mm [post-ovigerous female 2.2–3.1 mm]; cuticle well-calcified, fragile. Cephalothorax ( Figure 6D, E View Figure 6 ) 1.3 times ltb, with rounded lateral margins; rostrum rounded. Pereon 62% of body length, pereonites with lateral process at pereopod insertion, becoming more posterior from pereonite-1 to pereonite-6; pereonite-1 with two anterodorsal setae. Pleon ( Figure 6B View Figure 6 ) 18% of body length, pleonites of equal width; epimera with simple seta. Pleotelson ( Figure 6C View Figure 6 ) shorter than pleonites 4–5 together, with two simple setae and two PSS on posterior margin.
Antennule ( Figure 7A View Figure 7 ) 0.7 times as long as cephalothorax; article-1 fairly stout, 2.4 times ltb, twice as long as article-2, with two lateral group of three PSS and distolateral simple seta; article-2 1.7 times ltb, with distolateral seta, at least two PSS, with stouter distomedial seta; article-3 subrectangular, 0.6 times length of article-2, with two stout distal setae; article-4 longer than article-3, with one weak subdistal seta, four longer terminal setae and one aesthetasc. Antenna ( Figure 7B View Figure 7 ) just shorter than antennule; article-1 annular, naked; article-2 just longer than broad, with small superodistal seta; article-3 slightly smaller than article-2, with larger superodistal seta; article-4 slender, 7.5 times ltb, with very slight indication of fusion line at mid-length, with associated PSS, and with at least two distal PSS and two long inferodistal setae; article-5 slender, just under half as long as article-4, with distal seta; article-6 small, with five terminal setae.
Labrum ( Figure 7C View Figure 7 ) as long as broad, distally truncate, setulate. Mandibles ( Figure 7D–H View Figure 7 ) delicate; left mandible incisor tricuspid, lacinia acuminate, molar acuminate, with about twelve terminal spines, in sub-coronal array; right mandible incisor tetracuspid, molar acuminate with curved terminal spines. Labium ( Figure 7J View Figure 7 ) with sub-triangular inner lobe, distally setose. Maxillule ( Figure 7K View Figure 7 ) slender, endite with sparse rows of setules and eight (?) terminal spines; palp typical of genus. Maxilla ( Figure 7L View Figure 7 ) sub-ovate, half as long as maxilliped bases and endites together. Maxilliped ( Figure 7M, N View Figure 7 ) bases together cardiform, with small seta near articulation with palps, margin projecting distally over endite; each endite weakly flared, with setose distolateral margin, distolateral lobe, small rounded medial tubercle, and medial seta; palp article-1 naked; article-2 with long lateral seta overreaching article-3, with three inner setae, one serrulate on oral margin; article-3 larger than article-2, with three inner setae (two long, one weak); article-4 about half as long as article-3, with subdistal seta and five unequal terminal setae. Epignath not recovered.
Cheliped ( Figure 8A, B View Figure 8 ) robust; basis as long as broad, with superolateral seta; merus inferior margin as long as carpus margin, with one seta; carpus 1.5 times ltb, with two superior setae and two inferior setae; chela longer than carpus; propodus palm with two spines on medial comb; fixed finger longer than palm, with three setae proximal on incisive margin, with large distal tooth, terminal spine rounded; dactylus with small medial seta and two spines on inferior margin, distal larger.
Pereopod-1 ( Figure 9A View Figure 9 ) annular coxa with seta; basis slender, four times ltb (at widest breadth), smooth; ischium with stout seta; merus with weakly oblique articulation with carpus, about twice as long as broad, with inferodistal bayonet spine; carpus subrectangular, three times ltb, with one superodistal and one inferodistal bayonet spine; propodus slender, six times ltb, 1.2 times longer than carpus, with small superodistal seta and inferodistal bayonet spine; dactylus and unguis just longer than propodus, dactylus slightly shorter than the unguis, which has a rounded tip (possibly denoting a spinning pore). Pereopod-2 ( Figure 9B View Figure 9 ) similar to pereopod-1 but carpus with two, unequal, inferodistal bayonet spines. Pereopod-3 ( Figure 9C View Figure 9 ) similar to pereopod-2 but merus slightly shorter.
Pereopod-4 ( Figure 9D View Figure 9 ) coxa annular, with seta; basis broader than pereopods 1–3, 3.3 times ltb, with two inferior PSS; ischium with two setae; merus just over twice as long as broad, with two inferodistal bayonet spines; carpus subrectangular, as long as merus, with superodistal rod-shaped seta and three bayonet spines; propodus slender, about 1.2 times longer than carpus, inferior margin setulate, with two inferodistal bayonet spines and one superodistal bayonet spine half as long as dactylus; dactylus almost as long as carpus, with inferior spinulation; unguis slender, shorter than dactylus, together longer than propodus. Pereopod-5 ( Figure 9E View Figure 9 ) similar to pereopod-4 but basis with long PSS on inferior margin and with shallow superior groove. Pereopod-6 ( Figure 9F View Figure 9 ) similar to pereopod-5 but propodus without superodistal PSS, and with three superodistal spines.
Pleopod ( Figure 10A View Figure 10 ) peduncle visible from dorsal view of pleon, slender, three times ltb, subovate; endopod slender, seven times ltb, with distomedial seta (weaker than remainder) and four distolateral setae; exopod longer and broader than endopod, six times ltb, with seven distolateral setae; all setae sparsely plumose.
Uropod ( Figure 8C View Figure 8 ) as long as pleotelson; peduncle longer than broad; endopod two-segmented, segment-1 slightly longer than segment-2, with two long PSS, segment-2 with one subterminal seta, three terminal setae and one PSS; exopod two-segmented, segment-1 with distal seta, segment-2 cap-like, with larger, longer seta.
Manca-II: generally similar to non-ovigerous female but pleonite-5 without spur; without pereopods-6 or pleopods; length 0.98–1.04 mm.
Manca-III ( Figure 10C View Figure 10 ): generally similar to non-ovigerous female but pleonite-5 without spur; with rudimentary pereopods-6 and pleopods; length 1.02–1.38 mm.
Neuter-non-ovigerous female: similar to ovigerous female; length 1.4–3.5 mm.
Preparatory male: habitus ( Figure 6F View Figure 6 ) slender, seven times ltb, length 1.5– 2.8 mm. Cephalothorax 1.4 times ltb. Pereonite-6 sternite with small raised male pores. Pleon ( Figure 6G View Figure 6 ) 21% of body length, slightly wider than pereon. Antennule ( Figure 8D View Figure 8 ) stout, article-1 twice as long as broad. Pleopod ( Figure 10B View Figure 10 ) rami stouter than female, endopod and exopod 3.2 and 3.6 times ltb respectively; setae more numerous, endopod with one distomedial and eight terminal setae, exopod with nine terminal setae. Otherwise as female.
Distribution in study area
Represented by two records from AFEN: Hebrides Slope and North Rockall Trough, 1612 m and 1859 m respectively; also seven records from AFEN-area SMBA stations: Hebrides Slope , North Feni Ridge, and (northern) Rockall Trough, at 1800–1993 m, 1600–2000 m , and 2150–2200 m respectively; three records from AFEN-area INCAL Stn 1.3: (northern) Rockall Trough, 2081–2091 m . Also by 12 records from BIOICE: nine from Iceland Basin (slope) 1607–1940 m and three from Iceland Basin , 2079 ‒ 2296 m .
Overall depth range 1600–2296 m. Temperature range 2.7–3.7°C (n = 10) in BIOICE samples from Iceland Basin. Where recorded, the sediment type was ‘silty sand’ for the BIOICE stations and ‘mud’ and ‘sandy mud’ for single AFEN-area stations on the Hebrides Slope and in the northern Rockall Trough, respectively .
Distribution elsewhere
Recorded in 61 samples from the South Feni Ridge, Malin Slope, Rockall Trough, Porcupine Slope, Porcupine Seabight, abyssal Porcupine, Porcupine Abyssal Plain, North Biscay, abyssal North Biscay, Armorican Slope, Armorican Seamount, South Biscay Slope, and South Biscay, 1635–4632 m (Appendix B). It was most abundant at the SMBA’ s Stn ES 10 in the Rockall Trough, at 2540 m.
Remarks
This is a widely distributed and eurybathic (bathyal-abyssal) species within the Northeast Atlantic, although it is absent from the cold-water area north of Iceland and the Faroes. It differs from the other two described species in having the cheliped incisive margin with essentially a single large distal tooth – several in P. afer and P. fascinatus . The unusual cap-like segment-2 of the uropod exopod of Portaratrum holdichi n. sp. is very similar to that of Leptognathioides biarticulata , which seems to be further evidence for the possible close relationship between these genera.
The mouthparts of Portaratrum holdichi n. sp. are proportionately small and delicate in relation to the general robustness and size of the cephalothorax, with weak and acuminate mandibular molars. This suggests they deal with food items that are not as tough as those eaten by shallow-water taxa such as leptocheliids, tanaids, and paratanaids, where the mandibles are robust and have broad triturative molars. Since there is a similar apparent contrast of the delicate mouthparts with the robust chelipeds, it is possible that Portaratrum is adapted to predation on shell-forming foraminiferans. As with Leptognathioides , this genus is well-calcified, smooth, bearing relatively few setae on the carapace, pereon, pleon, and pleotelson.
Key to Portaratrum species
1. Cheliped fixed finger with single distal tooth; uropod exopod two-segmented
....................................................................................... Portaratrum holdichi View in CoL
Iceland Basin to North-east Atlantic - Cheliped fixed finger with several distal teeth; uropod exopod one-segmented
..................................................................................................................... 2
2. Cheliped carpus slender, longer than broad; pereopods 1–3 propodus inferior
margin spinulate ................................................................................. P. afer View in CoL
Angola Basin to South Atlantic - Cheliped carpus stout, as long as broad; pereopods 1–3 propodus inferior
margin smooth ........................................................................... P. fascinatus View in CoL
Eastern tropical Pacific
Comparison of Portaratrum View in CoL and Chauliopleona View in CoL
As was briefly discussed by Guerrero-Kommritz (2003) there is general similarity in habitus of these two genera in addition to the presence of a sternal spur on pleonite-5 (two examples from Chauliopleona View in CoL are shown in Figure 11B, C View Figure 11 ). However, this apparently shared character is homoplastic and independently evolved. Several other paratanaoid genera that belong in a variety of families express sternal spurs, such as Akanthophoreus Sieg View in CoL ( Figure 11A View Figure 11 ), Cryptocopoides Sieg View in CoL ( Figure 11D View Figure 11 ), Insociabilitanais Larsen View in CoL ( Figure 11E View Figure 11 ), Leptognathia G.O. Sars View in CoL sensu stricto ( Figure 11F View Figure 11 ), and Paranarthrurella Lang View in CoL ( Figure 11G View Figure 11 , here illustrated by P. arctophylax (Norman and Stebbing)) View in CoL . These processes are either heterogeneous or homogeneous in shape, recurved or not, or present on one or more pleonites.
While Chauliopleona View in CoL belongs in the Akanthophoreidae Sieg View in CoL (see Błażewicz- Paszkowycz and Bamber 2011), the classification of Portaratrum View in CoL remains uncertain. These two genera are easily distinguished by the morphologies of the cheliped and uropod, inter alia ( Table 2). Principally, in Chauliopleona View in CoL , the cheliped basis has a well-developed posterior lobe, the carpus possesses an inferior shield (sometimes highly developed, as in C. hastata View in CoL ), the palm inferior and superior margins are *indicates also applicable to Leptognathioides View in CoL .
divergent, and the uropods are markedly different in proportions. Those of Chauliopleona View in CoL are much more slender and the relative size of the exopod and endopod more unequal.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Genus |
Portaratrum holdichi
Bird, Graham J. 2014 |
Leptognathia
Holdich DM & Bird GJ 1985: 444 |