Luridiblatta quadrivittata ( Chopard, 1963 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5215.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8882FE42-0615-4BBA-9E71-457B8639102A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7403397 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AED24E-FFB9-DF32-A5BE-FC8CCB30FE5B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Luridiblatta quadrivittata ( Chopard, 1963 ) |
status |
|
7. Luridiblatta quadrivittata ( Chopard, 1963)
Figs. 1D View FIGURE 1 , 2D View FIGURE 2 , 3B View FIGURE 3 , 4D,G View FIGURE 4 , 5A View FIGURE 5 , 23A–K View FIGURE 23 , 24A–G View FIGURE 24 , 33A View FIGURE 33 , 34D,E View FIGURE 34 , 35E View FIGURE 35 , 41 View FIGURE 41 , 43 View FIGURE 43
Phyllodromica quadrivittata Chopard, 1963: 164 View in CoL , fig. 1; Princis 1971, 1097.
Diagnosis. In the male sex characterised by the hook having an abnormally broadened shaft as is typical for the beybienkoi -group, but with the claw still resembling the species of the longitubulata - and trivittata -group by having a small triangular crest, and no antlerlike processes ( Fig. 23J,K View FIGURE 23 ).
Material studied. Type material. Holotype, ♂, ISRAEL, Jerusalem, 23.VII.1949, J.Wahrman (slide: Bo 344; Isr 3) (M. Tel Aviv).
Additional material. ISRAEL: ex L: 4♂, 3♀, 4L, Tsova (E Jerusalem), 700 m, 19.VII.2010, leg. H.Bohn (slides: ♂, Is 10/1; ♀, Is 10/2); ex L: 10♂, 11♀, 7L, Ben Shemen Forest ( E Lod ), 2 km N Kfar Daniel, 120 m, 13.VII.2010 , leg. H.Bohn (slides: ♂, Is 11/1; ♀, Is 11/2–4); ex L: 6♂, 2L, Ben Shemen Forest (E Lod ), n. Kh. Khermeshit , 180 m, 13.VII.2010 , leg. H.Bohn (slide: ♂, Is 12/1); 1♂, ex L: 25♂, 24♀, 4L, Jerusalem, Jerusalem Forest, Har Hazikaron, 700 m, 15.VII.2010, leg. H.Bohn (slides: ♂, Is 13/1,2,3; ♀, Is 13/4,5; L, Is 13/6); ex L: 8♂, 9♀, 8L, Esht’ol ( NNE Beit Shemesh ), 280 m, 19.VII.2010, leg. H.Bohn (slides: ♂, Is 23/1; ♀, Is 23/lain 2,3). (Coll. Bohn, ZSMC) .— 1♂, Jerusalem, 25.10.1943, leg. Bytinski-Salz (slide: Bo 1248; Isr 3); ? 1♀ [specimen incomplete], Rehovot, 10.VIII.[19]56, J.Halperin (Isr 4); ?1L, Israel, Tel Baruch beach, 29.VIII.1978, Y.Hadar ( Isr 5); ?2L, Israel , Tel Aviv , 15.VIII.1982 / 20.VIII.1982 (Isr 7). (M. Tel Aviv) .
Additional, already published reports. ISRAEL: Kirjath-Anavim ( Bodenheimer 1935), determined as L. trivittata , according to the locality presumably L. quadrivittata (Isr 15); Ein Gedi (Isr 2) ( Chopard 1963).
Description. Size. Male. Length of pronotum 1.57–1.82 (mean 1.70) mm, of tegmina 3.81–4.45 (mean 4.03) mm. (N = 7/7). Female. Length of pronotum 1.73–1.86 (mean 1.80) mm, of tegmina 1.76–2.11 (mean 1.99) mm. (N = 8/8). T6 of male: Distance between the anterior bristle stripes in % of the tergite breadth: range 21.4–24.3, mean 23.4. (N = 7).
Female tegmina. Apical border shallowly concave ( Figs. 23G View FIGURE 23 , 24G View FIGURE 24 ).
Male abdomen. Tergites: Fig. 23A–E. T View FIGURE 23 6 View FIGURE 6 . Highly specialised as described under characters of the genus and the beybienkoi -group ( Figs. 1D View FIGURE 1 , 2D View FIGURE 2 , 3B View FIGURE 3 , 4D,G View FIGURE 4 , 5A View FIGURE 5 ). T7. Pit opening with gutters (gu, Figs. 23C View FIGURE 23 , 24A View FIGURE 24 , 33A View FIGURE 33 ) reaching near to the lateral borders of the tergite; pit size up to size 4; a nterior pit wall (aw) as in all other species of the group without strongly sclerotized area (“sa” in Fig. 24A View FIGURE 24 ), stabilising bracelet (s) narrow, window frame with well developed transversal folds (tf, Fig. 24B,C View FIGURE 24 ); posterior pit wall (pw) with a pair of wide and shallow bulges (bu, Fig. 24A,C View FIGURE 24 ); glandular pouches long (gp, Figs. 23C View FIGURE 23 , 24A View FIGURE 24 ), tubules short (tu, Fig. 23C View FIGURE 23 ). Genital hook. Among the species of the beybienkoi -group with the broadest shaft (sh), but shape due to largely membraneous parts difficult to define, apical process (ap) restricted to the right half of the upper end of the shaft ( Fig. 23D View FIGURE 23 ), forming a triangular peak; claw (cl) from the base almost rectangularly bent, crest (cr) small, rounded triangular, without antler processes ( Figs. 23J,K View FIGURE 23 , 24D,E View FIGURE 24 ).
Distribution. The distribution is—as far as known—restricted to a rather narrow zone in central Israel, mainly west of Jerusalem at a latitude between 31° 30’ and 32° 00’ N ( Fig. 41 View FIGURE 41 ) but may reach further to the South: Chopard (1963) is presumably right in assigning a larva from Ein Gedi to this species (Isr 2). Whether the two larvae from Tel Aviv (Isr 7) and the Tel Baruch Beach (Isr 5)—both localities situated slightly north of 32°00’—also belong to this species cannot be decided now.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SuperFamily |
Blaberoidea |
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Ectobiinae |
Genus |
Luridiblatta quadrivittata ( Chopard, 1963 )
Bohn, Horst 2022 |
Phyllodromica quadrivittata
Chopard, L. 1963: 164 |