Pontogeneus priscus Leidy, 1852
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/g2017n1a1 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:40D6C996-226D-49BF-8BF2-E07050BE9035 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4535947 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AA8455-8005-FFBE-89DF-FA2914ABFB1F |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Pontogeneus priscus Leidy, 1852 |
status |
|
Pontogeneus priscus Leidy, 1852
HOLOTYPE. — ANSP 13668 View Materials , isolated middle cervical centrum.
TYPE LOCALITY AND HORIZON. — The original description indicates that the holotype is “from the Eocene formation of Ouachita, Louisiana ” ( Leidy 1852: 52). Recently, Uhen (2005) pointed out the possibility that it comes from the vicinity of the Caldwell Parish, Louisiana, where the upper Eocene Jackson Group (Eargle 1959) is exposed.
DISCUSSION
Leidy (1852) created the taxon Pontogeneus priscus based on an isolated cervical vertebra ( Fig. 4 View FIG ), figured by Kellogg (1936) and interpreted as a fifth cervical. Uhen (2005) recognized it as a more anterior cervical (C3 or C4) and considered both genus and species as nomina nuda because the original description was not diagnostic and the vertebra could belong to a small specimen of Basilosaurus (indeed, the centrum is quite similar in size to that of UM-WH74, a small Basilosaurus isis ). However, it can be evaluated that the vertebarterial foramina in the holotype of P. priscus are proportionally larger than in Basilosaurus ( Fig. 4 View FIG ). Such a feature is diagnostic for the genus Cynthiacetus (Martínez-Cáceres & Muizon 2011) . Because of this character Pontogeneus priscus could have closer affinities with Cynthiacetus than with Basilosaurus (as proposed by Gingerich 2015). However, such a holotype (the centrum of an isolated cervical vertebra) is not regarded as diagnostic enough to characterize a basilosaurid taxon and it is suggested here that the binome Pontogeneus priscus should only refer to the cervical vertebra described by Leidy (1852). Therefore, the genus name and the species name should be regarded as a Basilosauridae or a Pelagiceti incertae sedis and restricted to the type specimen of P. priscus .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.