Plagiobrissus grandis (Gmelin, 1791)

Guilherme, Pablo Damian Borges, Bueno, Maristela de Lima, Metri, Rafael, Baptista-Metri, Cassiana, Loose, Robin Hilbert & Tavares, Yara Aparecida Garcia, 2023, First record of the heart urchin Plagiobrissus grandis (Gmelin, 1791) (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) in the coastal region of Paraná, southern Brazil, Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 63, pp. 1-8 : 2-4

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.11606/1807-0205/2023.63.026

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A5590C-AC11-FF99-FC8E-375E8CEC257E

treatment provided by

Felipe (2023-08-21 14:10:10, last updated by Plazi 2023-11-10 05:21:54)

scientific name

Plagiobrissus grandis (Gmelin, 1791)
status

 

Plagiobrissus grandis (Gmelin, 1791) View in CoL View at ENA Figs 1 View Figure 1 , 2 View Figure 2 , 3 View Figure 3 and 4 View Figure 4

Echinus grandis Gmelin, 1791 – Gmelin, 1791: 3200.

Spatangus pectoralis (Lamarck,1816) – Lamarck,1816: 29.

Eupatagus pectoralis (Lamarck, 1816) – D′Archiac & Haime, 1853: 217-218.

Metalia pectoralis (Lamarck,1816) View in CoL – Agassiz,1872:144-145.

Plagiobrissus pectoralis (Lamarck,1816) View in CoL –Pomel,1883:29-30.

Eupatagus (Plagiobrissus) grandis (Gmelin, 1791) – Cooke, 1942: 54.

Plagiobrissusgrandis (Gmelin,1791)– Clark,1917:207-208, pl. 146: figs. 21, 22. Mortensen, 1951: 496-498, pl. 40-41, 63:figs.13,16.Tommasi,1958:7, pl. 11: fig.4. Tommasi, 1966: 20, pl. 5b. Kier, 1975, fig. 2-5; pl. 1-3; pl. 4: figs. 1, 2. Martins et al., 2018: 16-18, figs. 14-15. Gondim et al., 2018: 47-49, fig. 17.

Material examined: Parque Nacional Marinho das Ilhas dos Currais (Paraná State) – 10 m, 02-VIII-2015, // Maristela Bueno det. 2018. 1 ♀ (UNESPAR – ECH 033); Djanka ferry wreck (Paraná State) – 26 m, 2016 // Robin Hilbert Loose, personal observation .

Diagnosis: The specimen (ECH 033) dimensions were 155.65 mm in length, 118.93 mm in width, and 41.31 mm in maximum height( Fig.3 View Figure 3 ),test oval and flattened,round- ed anteriorly and truncate posteriorly ( Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ). The carapace is extremely thin and fragile, brittle. At the top of the test, the apical disc plating is ethmolytic, with 4 symmetrically sized gonopores.The ambulacral zones draw 4 petals radiating on the upper face from the apical system, these petals are slightly inserted into the test, without forming a gutter or deep furrow. At the front of the test, a shallow notch, without perforations, connects the apical system to the front concavity, under which opens the mouth or peristome ( Fig. 4A View Figure 4 ), which is in an anterior and ventral position, and relatively small (18.48 mm) representing 15% of the total width of the organism. Labrum short, in contact with both sternal plates ( Fig. 4A View Figure 4 ). Between these petals extend the inter-ambulacral zones covered with large tubercles in relief: these are the supports for the long spines (length = 25.35 ± 7.19 mm; width = 0.75 ± 0.19 mm; n = 10), with short, backward-curving spines between them ( Figs. 1 View Figure 1 and 2 View Figure 2 ). The peripetal fasciole is covered with very small spines (length = 4.12 ± 1.11 mm;width = 0.29 ± 0.05 mm;n = 10). In the middle of the ventral face is the plastron ( Fig. 3A View Figure 3 ), particularly narrow, with rectilinear and parallel edges. Outside the plastron, there are longer spines ( Fig. 3B View Figure 3 ) with a fan-shaped base (length = 20.07 ± 5.04 mm; width = 0.60 ± 0.11 mm; base width = 1.38 ± 0.17 mm; n = 10). The spatulate spines in the plastron ( Fig. 3C View Figure 3 ) are thinner and shorter than on the rest of the oral surface (length = 9.11 ± 1.83 mm; width = 0.51 ± 0.06 mm; tip width = 0.68 ± 0.08 mm; n = 10). The suture between the sternal and episternal plates is very marked and concave. The terminal (posterior) anus, surrounded by a subanal fasciole shield-shaped ( Fig. 4B View Figure 4 ) with large plates. Periproct large (10.63 mm), tear-shaped ( Figs. 4B and C View Figure 4 ), truncate, surrounded by anal fasciole ( Fig. 4C View Figure 4 ).

Colour: Living specimens are light brown ( Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ), naked test light beige.

Distribution: North America and Caribbean Sea (Palomares & Pauly, 2022). In Brazil from Alagoas, Bahia, São Paulo (Tommasi, 1958, Netto et al., 2005, Gondim et al., 2018), and Paraná (present study), including Trindade Island (Martins et al., 2018). This is the first record of this species in Paraná State ( Fig. 5 View Figure 5 ). From depths of 1 to 210 m, but most common in less than 50 m (Serafy, 1979).

Agassiz, A. 1872. Revision of the Echini, pt. 1 - 2. Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, 3: 1 - 762. Available: https: // www. biodiversitylibrary. org / bibliography / 40080. Access: 16 / 05 / 2023.

Clark, H. L. 1917. Hawaiian and other Pacific Echini, Echinoneidae to Spatangidae. Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, 46 (2): 91 - 238. https: // www. biodiversitylibrary. org / bibliography / 42203.

Cooke, C. W. 1942. Cenozoic irregular echinoids of the Eastern United States. Journal of Paleontology, 16 (1): 1 - 62.

D'Archiac, E. J. A. & Haime, J. 1853. Description des animaux fossiles du groupe nummulitique de l'Inde, precedee d'un resume geologique et d'une monographie des nummulites. Paris, Gide et J. Baudry. 373 p. Available: https: // gallica. bnf. fr / ark: / 12148 / bpt 6 k 987100. Access: 16 / 05 / 2023.

Gallery Image

Figure 1. Live specimen Plagiobrissus grandis (ECH 033) in an aquarium. (A) oral view and (B) aboral view.(C) Image of the covering behavior.Photos: Robin Hilbert Loose.

Gallery Image

Figure 2. Fixedspecimen Plagiobrissusgrandis (ECH 033) – captured at approximately10mdepthnear ParqueNacionalMarinhodas IlhasdosCurrais (Paraná State). Aboral view (left)and oral view (right).Photo:Maristela Bueno.

Gallery Image

Figure 3. Oral view specimen Plagiobrissus grandis (ECH 033) – captured at approximately 10 m depth near Parque Nacional Marinho das Ilhas dos Currais (Paraná State).Oral view and plastron (A), long spines fan-shaped base,localized outside the plastron (B) and spatulate spines in the plastron (C).Photo:Maristela Bueno.

Gallery Image

Figure 4. Fixedspecimen Plagiobrissusgrandis (ECH 033) – captured at approximately10mdepthnear ParqueNacionalMarinhodas IlhasdosCurrais (Paraná State). Oral view,detail of peristome (A), subanal fasciole (B) and anal fasciole and periproct (C).Photo:Maristela Bueno.

Gallery Image

Figure 5. Geographical distribution of Plagiobrissus grandis in America.The dots represent the previous and new records of the species.Map background generat- ed with package ̎ggmap″ usingGoogle Maps API.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Echinodermata

Class

Echinoidea

Order

Spatangoida

Family

Brissidae

Genus

Plagiobrissus