Hyalonema
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.1866.1.3 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0398E958-4857-1557-FF41-09C213B1FB51 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Hyalonema |
status |
|
Hyalonema View in CoL . (Cyliconema) keiense Ijima, 1927 View in CoL ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 ; Tab. 11).
Material. NTM Z 0002594 View Materials —sta. NWS0052, off Rowley Shoals , Northwest Shelf , Scampi trawl Grounds, 17 o 28’S 118 o 53’E, depth 405 m. GoogleMaps WAM 13682 About WAM — RV Soela , sta. SO 4/82/8 C, N of Port Headland, 18 o 43’S 117 o 12’E, depth 368 m. GoogleMaps
Description. Body: The specimen NTM Z 0002594 is a complete upper part of the body, cuplike, 70 mm high and oval in the upper part of the body 60x 100 mm; the atrial cavity is slightly depressed. The sieveplate is similar to that of Hyalonema (Hyalonema) ; open meshes are assembled in groups separated by imperforate tracts). The other specimen is a fragment.
Spicules: The most important measurements are given in the Tab. 11. Choanosomal hexactins were found neither in our material nor in the holotype ( Ijima, 1927 wrote that their presence is uncertain). Unlike the holotype, many atrial pinular diactins were found in both new specimens; the pinular ray is conically pointed with few short spines. Some macramphidiscs in the specimen WAM 13682 have sparsely spiny shafts. Unlike the holotype, small macramphidiscs were not observed in the investigated specimens.
Remarks. The primary description was made from a single representative, a poor fragment, likely from the dermal surface. Unlike the new Australian specimens, pinular diactins located among atrial spicules are entirely absent in the holotype. All the other spicules are very similar in size and shape, the only exception being the small macramphidiscs; amphidiscs of such size are entirely absent in both of the new specimens (see Tab. 11). Neither of these differences seems to be significant enough to consider the new specimens to be a new species nor to distinguish them as a new subspecies.
H. ( Oonema ) Lendenfeld, 1915
Hyalonema . ( Oonema ?) microstauractina Tabachnick and Levi, 2000 ( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 , 13 View FIGURE 13 ; Tab. 12)
Material. MNHN (p1088; fr865)—Cidaris I, RV Franklin, sta. 24 2, 17 o 19.58’ S 147 o 47.61’ E, depth 1187– 1200 m . MNHN (p8)—Cidaris I, RV Franklin, sta. 3 1, 18 o 8.22’ S 147 o 33.97’ E, depth 1044–1067 m .
Description. Body: The most complete specimen (p1088) has a conical body 45 mm high and oval in the upper part of the body 20x 40 mm, other specimen are fragments.
Spicules: The measurements of spicules are given in Tab. 12, their specific features are discussed below. Macramphidiscs are regular but abnormal forms with 4 teeth and with several umbels were found in MNHN (fr865).
Remarks. These specimens are very similar to H. ( Oonema ?) microstauractina described from relatively close to Australian regions, off New Caledonia, Wallis and Futuna Islands. The complete absence of spicules with spindlelike pinular ray and apical cone is not an outstanding feature because the construction of the pinular ray in dermal spicules varies in the type series: All pinular rays are conical without an apical cone as it is in the newly found Australian as well as in the type series: MNHN HCL 430; 434; 435. The abnormal amphidiscs in the form of staurodiscs and hexadiscs found sometimes in the ‘Australian’ specimens should be considered as an intraspecific variation, as known for other species of Hyalonema .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Hyalonema
Tabachnick, Konstantin R. & Menschenina, Dorte Janussen And Larisa L. 2008 |
(Cyliconema) keiense
Ijima 1927 |
Chalaronema
Ijima 1927 |