Agyneta Hull, 1911

Dupérré, Nadine, 2013, Taxonomic revision of the spider genera Agyneta and Tennesseellum (Araneae, Linyphiidae) of North America north of Mexico with a study of the embolic division within Micronetinae sensu Saaristo & Tanasevitch 1996, Zootaxa 3674 (1), pp. 1-189 : 8-17

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3674.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:981F80ED-96D7-40C7-8A3C-677954416A2E

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6162279

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038D6700-FFBB-5607-118C-03FAAAD7B539

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Agyneta Hull, 1911
status

 

Agyneta Hull, 1911 View in CoL View at ENA

Agyneta Hull 1911: 583 View in CoL . Type species Microneta passiva ( O. Pickard-Cambridge 1906) .

Anomalaria Dahl 1912: 611. Type species Agyneta subtilis ( O. Pickard-Cambridge 1863) View in CoL .

Meioneta Hull 1920: 9 . Type species Meioneta rurestris ( C.L. Koch 1836) . SYNONYMY REAFFIRMED Aprolagus Simon 1929: 534 –535, 718–719. Type species Aprolagus saxatilis ( Backwall 1844) .

Syedrula Simon 1929: 534 –536, 715. Type species Syedrula innotabilis ( O. Pickard-Cambridge1863) . Ischnyphantes Simon 1929: 717 –718. Type species Ischnyphantes rurestris ( C.L. Koch 1836) .

Gnathantes Chamberlin & Ivie 1943: 5 . Type species Gnathantes ferosa Chamberlin & Ivie 1943 .

Diagnosis: Agyneta males and females can be distinguished from those of the closely related genus, Tennesseellum by the position of the spiracle, in Agyneta the spiracle is positioned close to the spinnerets ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 31 – 33 ) whereas in Tennesseellum the spiracle is positioned midway between the spinnerets and the epigastric groove ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 31 – 33 ), from Anibontes by the finely reticulate sternum not extending between coxae ( Fig. 593 View FIGURES 588 – 598 ), whereas in Agyneta the sternum extend between the coxae ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ). From all other North American Linyphiidae Agyneta males are distinguished by the sickle-shaped embolus attached basally by a folded membrane, and bearing a projecting embolus proper on its retrolateral surface ( Figs 34, 35 View FIGURES 34 – 39. 34, 36 – 39 ). Females are distinguished by their folded scapes ending in well developed lateral lobes, in ventral view the lateral lobes appears as eye-liked structure ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 34 – 39. 34, 36 – 39 ).

Description: Male: Total length: 1.1–2.6, female: Total length: 1.6–2.5.

Carapace variable; yellow, orange to light brown; suffused with gray along radiating lines, with or without trident marking ( Fig. 258 View FIGURES 254 – 264 ); oval ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ) to elongate oval ( Fig. 258 View FIGURES 254 – 264 ); reticulate; in lateral view anterior part slightly elevated ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ); fovea not visible. Clypeus; height low 1–2, medium 3–4 or high 5 ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ); straight or protruding. Eyes; eight in pairs; anterior median eyes (AME) circular, usually the smallest, anterior lateral eyes (ALE) and posterior lateral eyes (PLE) circular, more or less of equal size, posterior median eyes (PME) circular typically the largest. Sternum; yellow, orange or light brown; slightly or strongly suffused with gray; smooth or somewhat reticulate; as long as wide; extending between coxae ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ). Endites; as long as wide, serrula present (only observed in A. decora , A. rurestris ) ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ). Labium; rebordered, fused to the sternum ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ). Chelicerae; promargin and retromargin with small teeth or denticles; cheliceral stridulatory organ always present ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ), the striae can be more or less pronounced, and more or less widely spaced. Two forms of chelicerae are found in Agyneta males. The common form has a long paturon (visibly much longer than wide) and long and narrow fangs ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 17 – 24. 17 ). In this form, the paturon may be excavated ( Figs 24–26 View FIGURES 17 – 24. 17 View FIGURES 25 – 30. 25 ) or not excavated ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 17 – 24. 17 ). On the retromarginal and promarginal side of the paturon, near the base of the fang, there is sometimes a triangular or rounded projection (ppr) ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 25 – 30. 25 ). Variation occurs; in A. fabra , the paturon of the male bears a mastidion ( Figs 21 View FIGURES 17 – 24. 17 , 395 View FIGURES 390 – 401 ), and in other species the paturon has seta-tipped tubercles (h-tip) ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 25 – 30. 25 ). In A. fillmorana two morphs exist, males with extremely elongated chelicerae ( Figs 22 View FIGURES 17 – 24. 17 , 179 View FIGURES 172 – 180 ) and extremely long fangs along with males with normal size chelicerae ( Fig. 180 View FIGURES 172 – 180 ). In the second form, the paturon is shorter (slightly longer than wide) and the fangs are short and wide as well. The paturon is always slightly excavated and no seta-tipped tubercles nor triangular or rounded projections are ever found on it ( Figs 1, 5 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ). Abdomen; more or less oval ( Figs 176–178 View FIGURES 172 – 180 ) to elongated ( Figs 258 View FIGURES 254 – 264 , 269 View FIGURES 265 – 273 ); uniformly light to dark gray ( Fig. 304 View FIGURES 300 – 308 ) or patterned ( Figs 189, 190 View FIGURES 185 – 194 ); spiracles near base of spinnerets ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 31 – 33 ). Shape of abdomen is mentioned in species descriptions only if it is other than oval. Spinnerets; studied here only for the adult male of A. decora ( A. rurestris and A. ramosa studied in Arnedo et al. 2009), ALS with one major ampullate spigot and eight to ten piriform spigots, PMS with one minor ampullate spigot and two aciniform spigots, PLS with one of the triplet spigots retained (presumably one of the aggregate spigots) and three aciniform spigots ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ); and for female of A. rurestris ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 9 – 16. 9 ), ALS with one major ampullate spigot and ten piriform spigots ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 9 – 16. 9 a), PMS with one cylindrical, two aciniform, one minor ampullate spigot ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 9 – 16. 9 b) and PLS with at least one cylindrical, and numerous aciniform spigots, two aggregate and one flagelliform spigots ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 9 – 16. 9 c). Colulus; triangular with a ~ 4–6 setae. Legs: usually uniformly colored, occasionally patterned; leg formula 4123, two dorsal tibial spines, TmI present (0.13–0.93); TmIV present or absent; female palpal tarsus normal or enlarged, without claw. Respiratory system: illustrated here only for A. decora , ( A. subtilis , A. saxatilis studied by Blest 1976, A. rurestris studied by Hormiga 1994), desmistracheate ( Figs 29 View FIGURES 25 – 30. 25 a–b, 31) with two median tracheae (mtr) and the two lateral tracheae (ltr) which are less than half the diameter of the median tracheae ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 25 – 30. 25 a, 31) and one spiracle ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 25 – 30. 25 ). Hormiga (1994a: 44) found for A. rurestris “a tracheal atrium that opens via a single spiracle”. I observed the same conformation in Agyneta , Anibontes and Tennesseellum ( Figs 31, 32, 33 View FIGURES 31 – 33 ).

Genitalia: The palpal tibia of Agyneta males can have quite elaborate apophyses, the tibia can possess a retrolateral tibial apophysis (rta) and a dorsal tibial apophysis (dta) of various shapes and forms, rugose or smooth ( Figs 290 View FIGURES 290 – 299 , 316 View FIGURES 316 – 325 , 326 View FIGURES 326 – 335 ). The dorsal tibial apophysis is sometimes difficult to characterize. It can be very distinct from the retrolateral tibial apophysis, but most of the time it is continuous with the retrolateral tibial apophysis and not so well-sclerotized ( Figs 213 View FIGURES 213 – 222 , 361 View FIGURES 361 – 367 ). The tibia bears one or two trichobothria retrolaterally, one dorsally, none prolaterally ( Figs 64 View FIGURES 64 – 71 , 108 View FIGURES 108 – 115 ). The cymbium is more or less elevated dorsally, from rounded, triangular to conical ( Figs 72 View FIGURES 72 – 78 , 137 View FIGURES 137 – 143 , 421 View FIGURES 421 – 424 ). The retrolateral side can bear a glabrous depression (gd) ( Figs 213 View FIGURES 213 – 222 , 238 View FIGURES 238 – 245 ) corresponding to the hairless depression of Saaristo (1973: 462). In some species, mainly from southern USA, this depression is absent ( Figs 520 View FIGURES 520 – 528 , 529 View FIGURES 529 – 537 , 538 View FIGURES 538 – 545 , 546 View FIGURES 546 – 549 , 550 View FIGURES 550 – 556 , 562 View FIGURES 562 – 569 ). The fillmorana group has a distinctive retrolateral fold (rlf) adjacent to the glabrous depression ( Figs 172 View FIGURES 172 – 180 , 185 View FIGURES 185 – 194 , 195, 197 View FIGURES 195 – 201. 195, 196 , 202 View FIGURES 202 – 208 , 209 View FIGURES 209 – 212 ). About midway along the retrolateral margin there is a notch (rln) and at the base there is a membranous region (mr) with which the paracymbium articulates ( Fig. 64 View FIGURES 64 – 71 ). The prolateral side also bears an apical notch (pln) and some basal cymbial tubercles (t) ( Fig. 65 View FIGURES 64 – 71 ). Saaristo (1973: 462), described the tubercles as “a small tubercle (st), and behind it a big tubercle (bt) which is partly contiguous with the prolateral tooth (plt)”. The terminology used by Saaristo can be somewhat confusing as, in some species, the “small tubercle” is big and the “big tubercle” is small, as in A. crawfordi , A. spicula ( Figs 210 View FIGURES 209 – 212 , 317 View FIGURES 316 – 325 ). Here I use the term dorsal tubercle (dt) for the tubercle more dorsally situated on the cymbium (corresponding to Saaristo’s small tubercle) and ventral tubercle (vt) for the one more ventrally situated and contiguous with the prolateral tooth (corresponding to Saaristo’s big tubercle) ( Figs 239 View FIGURES 238 – 245 , 255 View FIGURES 254 – 264 ). In some species (eg. A. aquila , A. rurestris ) there is only one tubercle ( Figs 87 View FIGURES 86 – 89 , 109 View FIGURES 108 – 115 ) or they can be more or less fused ( Figs 65 View FIGURES 64 – 71 , 173 View FIGURES 172 – 180 ) has in A. decora , A. fillmorana , making their homology assessement more difficult. The tubercles may be smooth or rugose ( Figs 203 View FIGURES 202 – 208 , 347 View FIGURES 346 – 353 ).

Saaristo (1973: 462, figs 33–37) divided the paracymbium into three regions, 1) the proximal part with some setae, 2) a middle part with two depressions, the anterior pocket of paracymbium (apo), which can be short to very long, and is sometimes fused with the posterior pocket of paracymbium (ppo), which can be long, short or, spinelike, and 3) and the apical part with a the apical pocket of paracymbium (appo) ( Fig. 64 View FIGURES 64 – 71 ) which is always present, except in A. decorata ( Fig. 562 View FIGURES 562 – 569 ).

The bulb can be divided into six main regions, which are all associated with the sperm duct: the subtegulum, tegulum (te), suprategulum (spt), column (co), radix (r) and the embolus (e) ( Figs 34, 35 View FIGURES 34 – 39. 34, 36 – 39 ). The subtegulum and tegulum are simple sclerites without projections. The suprategulum is more or less triangular, apically with a well sclerotized pointed tip apically. The distal suprategular apophysis (dsa), is an important structure used in copulation, as the tip of the distal suprategular apophysis is pushed in the stretcher pit of the epigynum (van Heldsingen 1965). The distal suprategular apophysis medially bears a transparent column (co) to which is attached a translucent, elongated embolic membrane (em) ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 34 – 39. 34, 36 – 39 ). The column (co) is attached to the radix retrolaterally by a well sclerotized pillar (pi) ( Fig. 41 View FIGURES 40 – 45. 40, 41 ). Retrolaterally the radix is well-sclerotized peripherally, and membranous centrally. Apically there is a blunt hook (bh) and dorsally a small to large bulge (bu) ( Figs 41 View FIGURES 40 – 45. 40, 41 , 111 View FIGURES 108 – 115 ). In a few species there are some small spines scattered on the surface of the radix ( Figs 75 View FIGURES 72 – 78 , 82 View FIGURES 79 – 85 ). Attached to the membranous part of the radix are three sclerites, more or less attached to each other. First is the anterior terminal apophysis (ata), a more or less sclerotized, elongated sclerite with or without protrusions at the tip. Second is the posterior terminal apophysis (pta), a shorter, more sclerotized sclerite with various shapes and forms, with or without associated prongs. Finally at the tip of the radix lies the lamella characteristica (lc), a very complex sclerite with multiples prongs, folds, and various textures ( Figs 41 View FIGURES 40 – 45. 40, 41 , 111 View FIGURES 108 – 115 , 175 View FIGURES 172 – 180 , 216 View FIGURES 213 – 222 ).

Also attached to the radix there is a sickle-shaped, well sclerotized embolus (e), that can be divided into apical and basal parts ( Fig. 40 View FIGURES 40 – 45. 40, 41 ). The base of the embolus has a folded membranous section (mfo), and it is attached to the membranous part of the radix. The embolus is on the prolateral-basal side of the radix, whereas the sclerites are on its retrolateral side ( Figs 34, 35 View FIGURES 34 – 39. 34, 36 – 39 ). The embolus is more or less movable through this membranous part and can be detached easily at this point without breaking. The embolus can harbor different kinds of prongs, flanges or spines basally, medially or apically ( Figs 74 View FIGURES 72 – 78 , 174 View FIGURES 172 – 180 , 356 View FIGURES 354 – 360 , 382 View FIGURES 380 – 389 ). Prolaterally the embolus has a more or less oval, short or elongated but very well sclerotized swelling which appears to be a reinforcement point (rp) for the apical part of the embolus ( Fig. 40 View FIGURES 40 – 45. 40, 41 ). On its dorsal side the embolus bears a more or less elongated smooth, process, the thumb (th) and on its ventral side a transparent, smooth or rugose lamella, the ventral lamella (vl) ( Figs 40 View FIGURES 40 – 45. 40, 41 , 110 View FIGURES 108 – 115 , 427 View FIGURES 425 – 431 ). The ventral lamella reaches the base of the embolus proper, since it is transparent it is sometimes difficult to distinguish and differentiate from other processes. In some species it is clearly absent ( Figs 427 View FIGURES 425 – 431 , 434 View FIGURES 432 – 438 , 441 View FIGURES 439 – 442 ). The embolus proper (ep) is a more or less triangular projection, of variable size where the sperm duct (sd) ends, situated on the retrolateral side of the embolus. The sperm duct divides the embolus proper in two parts, those parts can be of more or less equal size ( Figs 40 View FIGURES 40 – 45. 40, 41 , 99 View FIGURES 97 – 103 ) or one part can be much larger than the other part ( Figs 74 View FIGURES 72 – 78 , 139 View FIGURES 137 – 143 , 174 View FIGURES 172 – 180 ). It can bet set apically ( Fig. 40 View FIGURES 40 – 45. 40, 41 ), medially ( Fig. 382 View FIGURES 380 – 389 ) or basally ( Fig. 240 View FIGURES 238 – 245 ). The embolus proper may be fixed in place along a horizontal ridge associated with the tip of the embolus ( Figs 40 View FIGURES 40 – 45. 40, 41 , 110 View FIGURES 108 – 115 ). This basic form is found in the decora , rurestris , picta and llanoensis groups. In the lophophor group the embolus proper is fixed on a short horizontal ridge, but it’s difficult to determine if it is associated with the tip of embolus. In the fillmorana group the dorsal part of the embolus proper is serrated and crest-like, reaching the tip of the embolus ( Figs 27 View FIGURES 25 – 30. 25 , 174 View FIGURES 172 – 180 , 187 View FIGURES 185 – 194 ). In the vinki group, the embolus proper is set on a horizontal ridge as well but linked with the retro-basal side of the embolus tip in correlation with a projection ( Fig. 215 View FIGURES 213 – 222 arrow). The fratrella group has a unique configuration where the embolus proper is set basally, and covered by the sclerotized tip of the thumb ( Figs 240 View FIGURES 238 – 245 , 248, 252 View FIGURES 246 – 253. 246 – 249 ). In the parva group the embolus proper is set on a long or short vertical ridge, not associated with the embolus tip ( Figs 292 View FIGURES 290 – 299 , 311 View FIGURES 309 – 315 ). The micaria group has the embolus proper set medially or apically and not associated with the embolus tip ( Figs 382 View FIGURES 380 – 389 , 392 View FIGURES 390 – 401 , 404 View FIGURES 402 – 411 , 414 View FIGURES 412 – 420 , 423 View FIGURES 421 – 424 ).

The sperm duct runs from the membranous base of the embolus, through the embolus to end in the embolus proper. Through its course in the embolus, the sperm duct may be enlarged into a gland, the Fickert’s gland (fg). The Fickert’s gland can be set medially ( Fig. 392 View FIGURES 390 – 401 ) or basally ( Fig. 106 View FIGURES 104 – 107 ) within the embolus and can be globular ( Fig. 199 View FIGURES 195 – 201. 195, 196 ) or more or less elongated ( Fig. 240 View FIGURES 238 – 245 ). When the Fickert’s gland was observed within a species, multiple specimens were studied and in every case the Fickert’s gland was present.

The epigynum consists of a folded scape of the ventral plate. When untreated the epigynum appears to have an oval sclerotized plate with two large slits. These epigynal slits (sl) are filled by eye-like, transparent structures, the lateral lobes (ll) ( Figs 36 View FIGURES 34 – 39. 34, 36 – 39 , 112 View FIGURES 108 – 115 ). The middle part, the proximal part of scape (pps) can take many shapes from triangular to oval, with or without an indentation, the pit hook depression (phd) ( Figs 36 View FIGURES 34 – 39. 34, 36 – 39 , 229 View FIGURES 223 – 232 , 358 View FIGURES 354 – 360 ). Underneath the pit hook depression there can be a knob-liked structure, the stretcher (st) ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 34 – 39. 34, 36 – 39 ). When treated with 10% KOH the scape unfolds, and can be separated into three regions ( Saaristo & Tanasevitch 1996: 171), the proximal part (pps), the median part (mps) and the distal part of scape (dps) (see Paquin et al. 2009, figs 11, 22). The distal part of scape is composed of the lateral lobes (ll), the lateral lobes pockets (po), the stretcher (st) and the pit (pi) ( Figs 36– 39 View FIGURES 34 – 39. 34, 36 – 39 ). The genital pores (gp) can be situated in the distal part of the scape (in the lateral lobes, or at the base of the lateral lobe pockets) or in the median part ( Figs 114 View FIGURES 108 – 115 , 220 View FIGURES 213 – 222 , 245 View FIGURES 238 – 245 , 411 View FIGURES 402 – 411 ). The copulatory ducts (cd) runs from the genital pores to the receptacula throughout the scape, they can be straight or undulate ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 34 – 39. 34, 36 – 39 , 334 View FIGURES 326 – 335 ). The internal genitalia is composed of one or two receptacula (re) of different shapes and oriented in various positions ( Figs 37 View FIGURES 34 – 39. 34, 36 – 39 , 149 View FIGURES 144 – 150 , 359 View FIGURES 354 – 360 , 536 View FIGURES 529 – 537 ). The fertilization ducts are difficult to observed under compound scope, seeing that they are not well sclerotized, they are best observed in dorsal view and are positioned on the dorsal side of the receptacula and directed inward ( Figs 38 View FIGURES 34 – 39. 34, 36 – 39 , 129 View FIGURES 123 – 129 , 136 View FIGURES 130 – 136 ).

Composition: The genus Agyneta presently contains 191 described species: A. adami Millidge 1991 , A. affinis (Kulczyn'ski 1898), A. affinisoides ( Tanasevitch 1984) , A. albinotata Millidge 1991 , A. alboguttata Jocqué 1985 , A. albomaculata Baert 1990 , A. allosubtilis Loksa 1965 , A. alpica ( Tanasevitch 2000) , A. amersaxatilis ( Saaristo & Koponen 1998) , A. angulata ( Emerton 1882) , A. aquila Dupérré 2013 , A. arida Baert 1990 , A. arietans ( O.P.- Cambridge 1872), A. barfoot Dupérré 2013 , A. barrowsi Chamberlin & Ivie 1944 , A. bermudensis (Strand 1906) , A. birulai (Kulczyn'ski 1908), A. birulaioides ( Wunderlich 1995) , A. boninensis Saito 1982 , A. breviceps Hippa & Oksala 1985 , A. brevipes ( Keyserling 1886) , A. brevis Millidge 1991 , A. bronx Dupérré 2013 , A. brusnewi (Kulczyn'ski 1908), A. bucklei Dupérré 2013 , A. bueko Wunderlich, 1983 , A. canariensis ( Wunderlich 1987) , A. castanea Millidge 1991 , A. catalina Dupérré 2013 , A. cauta ( O.P.- Cambridge 1902), A. chiricahua Dupérré 2013 , A. cincta , A. collina Millidge 1991 , A. conigera ( O. P.- Cambridge 1863), A. crawfordi , A. crista Dupérré 2013 , A. curvata Bosmans 1979 , A. dactylis Tao, Li & Zhu 1995 , A. danielbelangeri , A. darrelli Dupérré 2013 , A. decora ( O.P.- Cambridge 1871), A. decorata Chamberlin & Ivie 1944 , A. decurvis Tao, Li & Zhu 1995 , A. delphina Dupérré 2013 , A. dentifera Locket 1968 , A. depigmentata ( Wunderlich 2008) , A. discolor , A. disjuncta Millidge 1991 , A. dynica Saaristo & Koponen 1998 , A. emertoni ( Roewer 1942) , A. equestris ( L. Koch 1881) , A. erinacea Dupérré 2013 , A. evadens ( Chamberlin 1925) , A. exigua Russell-Smith 1992 , A. fabra ( Keyserling 1886) , A. falcata Li & Zhu 1995 , A. fillmorana ( Chamberlin 1919) , A. flandroyae Jocqué 1985 , A. flavipes Ono 1991 , A. flax , A. flibuscrocus Dupérré 2013 , A. floridana ( Banks 1896) , A. fratrella ( Chamberlin 1919) , A. frigida , A. fusca Millidge 1991 , A. fuscipalpa ( C. L. Koch 1836) , A. gagnei Gertsch 1973 , A. galapagosensis Baert 1990 , A. girardi Dupérré 2013 , A. gracilipes Holm 1968 , A. grandcanyon Dupérré 2013 , A. gulosa ( L. Koch 1869) , A. habra Locket 1968 , A. hedini Paquin & Dupérré 2009 , A. ignorata Saito 1982 , A. innotabilis ( O.P.- Cambridge 1863), A. insolita Locket & Russell-Smith 1980 , A. insulana ( Tanasevitch, 2000) , A. iranica ( Tanasevitch 2011) , A. issaqueena Dupérré 2013 , A. jacksoni Braendegaard 1937 , A. jiriensis Wunderlich 1983 , A. kaszabi Loksa 1965 , A. kopetdaghensis ( Tanasevitch 1989) , A. laimonasi ( Tanasevitch 2006) , A. larva Locket 1968 , A. lauta Millidge 1991 , A. ledfordi Dupérré 2013 , A. leucophora Chamberlin & Ivie 1944 , A. levii ( Tanasevitch 1984) , A. levis Locket 1968 , A. lila (Dönitz & Strand 1906) , A. llanoensis ( Gertsch & Davis 1936) , A. longipes Chamberlin & Ivie 1944 , A. lophophor ( Chamberlin & Ivie 1933) , A. luctuosa Millidge 1991 , A. manni Crawford & Edwards 1989 , A. maritima ( Emerton 1919) , A. martensi Tanasevitch 2006 , A. mediocris , A. mendosa Millidge 1991 , A. merretti Locket 1968 , A. mesasiatica ( Tanasevitch 2000) , A. metropolis Russell-Smith & Jocqué 1986 , A. micaria ( Emerton 1882) , A. milleri Thaler et al. 1997 , A. miniata Dupérré 2013 , A. minorata Chamberlin & Ivie 1944 , A. mollis ( O.P.- Cambridge 1871), A. mongolica Loksa 1965 , A. montana , A. montivaga Millidge 1991 , A. mossica Schikora 1993 , A. muriensis Wunderlich 1983 , A. natalensis Jocqué 1984 , A. nigra Oi 1960 , A. nigripes ( Simon 1884) , A. nigripes nivicola ( Simon 1929) , A. obscura Denis 1950 , A. oculata Millidge 1991 , A. okefenokee Dupérré 2013 , A. olivacea ( Emerton 1882) , A. opaca Millidge 1991 , A. ordinaria Chamberlin & Ivie 1947 , A. orites ( Thorell 1875) , A. pakistanica Tanasevitch 2011 , A. palgongsanensis Paik 1991 , A. palustris Li & Zhu 1995 , A. panthera , A. paquini Dupérré 2013 , A. paraprosecta ( Tanasevitch 2010) , A. parva ( Banks 1896) , A. perspicua Dupérré 2013 , A. picta Chamberlin & Ivie 1944 , A. pinta Baert 1990 , A. pistrix Dupérré 2013 , A. plagiata ( Banks 1929) , A. platnicki Dupérré 2013 , A. pogonophora Locket 1968 , A. prima , A. propinqua , A. propria Millidge 1991 , A. prosectes Locket 1968 , A. prosectoides Locket & Russell-Smith 1980 , A. protrudens ( Chamberlin & Ivie, 1933) , A. proxima Millidge 1991 , A. pseudofuscipalpis ( Wunderlich 1983) , A. pseudorurestris ( Wunderlich 1980) , A. pseudosaxatilis ( Tanasevitch 1984) , A. punctata ( Wunderlich 1995) , A. ramosa Jackson 1912 , A. regina Chamberlin & Ivie 1944 , A. resima ( L. Koch 1881) , A. ressli Wunderlich 1973 , A. ripariensis ( Tanasevitch 1984) , A. rufidorsa Denis 1961 , A. rugosa Wunderlich 1992 , A. rurestris ( C.L. Koch 1836) , A. saaristoi ( Tanasevitch 2000) , A. sandia Dupérré 2013 , A. saxatilis ( Blackwall 1844) , A. semipallida Chamberlin & Ivie 1944 , A. serrata ( Emerton 1909) , A. serratichelis Denis 1964 , A. serratula ( Wunderlich 1995) , A. sheffordiana ( Dupérré & Paquin 2007) , A. silvae Millidge 1991 , A. similis (Kulczyn'ski 1926), A. simplex ( Emerton 1926) , A. simplicitarsis ( Simon 1884) , A. spicula Dupérré 2013 , A. straminicola Millidge 1991 , A. subnivalis ( Tanasevitch 1989) , A. subtilis ( O. P.- Cambridge 1863), A. suecica Holm 1950 , A. tenuipes Ono 2007 , A. tianschanica ( Tanasevitch 1989) , A. tibialis ( Tanasevitch 2005) , A. tincta Jocqué 1985 , A. transversa ( Banks 1898) , A. trifurcata Hippa & Oksala 1985 , A. tuberculata Dupérré 2013 , A. unicornis Tao, Li & Zhu 1995 , A. unimaculata ( Banks 1892) , A. usitata Locket 1968 , A. uta ( Chamberlin 1920) , A. uzbekistanica ( Tanasevitch 1984) , A. vera ( Wunderlich 1976) , A. vinki , A. watertoni , A. yukona Dupérré 2013 , A. yulungiensis Wunderlich 1983 .

Distribution: Agyneta has a worldwide distribution and species occur on every continent except for Antarctica. The majority of the fauna occurs in the Nearctic (33%) and Palearctic (31%) regions. The Neotropical region contains 16% of the fauna, mostly found in South America. In the Neotropic, 91% of the fauna occurs in South America and only 9% are known to occur in Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean. I have examined a fair number of new species from Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean, as such the number of species of Agyneta should increase significantly in these regions. The Afrotropical region contains 9% of the fauna, the Indomalayan 8%, Australasia 1% and only 2% of the fauna has and Holarctic distribution.

Natural History: In North America, Agyneta species are found in different environments, but most species are found in forested habitats. From the data included on the labels we can ascertain that A. allosubtilis is mostly found in spruce forests and bogs. A. vinki , A. panthera , A. fratrella are generally found in deciduous forests and A. bucklei , A. minorata A. barrowsi occur in oak and oak-pine forests. A. parva , A. picta and A. serrata are found in hardwood hammock forests. A few species seem to prefer non-forested habitats, A. unimaculata , A. fabra , A.

lophophor are found in pastures, prairies and fields. Some species are simply generalists, A. simplex can be found in alpine meadows as well as in prairies.

In Newfoundland Pickavance & Dondale (2005) reported that A. allosubtilis is found in mixed coniferous woods in shrubby areas, A. amersaxatilis and A. simplex are found in exposed rocky coastal area, A. dynica occurs in rocky coastal area as well as in alpine regions and coniferous woods and A. fabra , A. jacksoni and A. olivacea are found in coniferous woods.

In Nunavut Agyneta maritima was found in gravel without vegetation and in sedge meadow ( Pickavance 2006). In Yukon, A. lophophor was found in moss on sagebrush-covered slopes and on dunes ( Dondale et al. 1997).

Some species prefer alpine habitat A. olivacea , A. maritima are found in alpine tundra ( Dondale et al. 1997) as well A. jacksoni A. maritima A. mollis , A. nigripes have been reported in alpine habitats by Nagy & Grabehrr (2009).

A. manni View in CoL is found in subalpine and alpine environments in the Central Cascade Mountains of Washington ( Crawford & Edwards 1989), and now has been found under rocks at high elevation in southwestern British Columbia and is consider a Pacific Northewest endemic ( Bennett & Copley 2011).

Two species of Agyneta View in CoL are considered troglophiles in North America, A. llanoensis View in CoL and A. hedini View in CoL . A. llanoensis View in CoL has been found in numerous caves mostly in Texas, "where it spins sizeable webs among rocks on the ground, or in various depressions, in which the spider hangs upside down" ( Paquin et al. 2009) and A. hedini View in CoL has been found in the dark zone of two caves one in Colorado and one in Arizona. The only completely blind Agyneta View in CoL therefore consider a true troglobite occurs in Hawaii and was described by Gertsch (1973).

Not much is known about Agyneta View in CoL phenology, A. fabra View in CoL females and juveniles overwinter while the males are present in summer ( Aitchinson 1984), in A. manni View in CoL both sexes mature in July or early August only a short time aftre snow melt ( Crawford & Edwards 1989).

Blandenier & First (1998) collected spiders in suction trap from an agricultural landscape in Switzerland. In there study Agyneta rurestris View in CoL was one of the more abundant Linyphiidae View in CoL collected while ballooning. Based on the data from labels at least, A. simplex View in CoL , A crista View in CoL and A. girardi View in CoL have been collected while ballooning.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Linyphiidae

SubFamily

Micronetinae

Loc

Agyneta Hull, 1911

Dupérré, Nadine 2013
2013
Loc

Gnathantes

Chamberlin 1943: 5
1943
Loc

Syedrula

Simon 1929: 534
Simon 1929: 717
1929
Loc

Meioneta

Simon 1929: 534
Hull 1920: 9
1920
Loc

Agyneta

Hull 1911: 583
1911
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF