Achaearanea conjuncta (Gertsch & Mulaik 1936)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.273386 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6255563 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038687FF-DC56-FF9E-FEF5-FED782EB74B0 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Achaearanea conjuncta (Gertsch & Mulaik 1936) |
status |
|
Achaearanea conjuncta (Gertsch & Mulaik 1936)
( Figs 58–63 View FIGURES 53 – 63. 53 – 57 )
Material examined.— Canada: Québec: Kazabazua, La ValléedelaGatineau, Lac Danford [45°57’N, 76°08’W] 16.vi.2001, sweeping in a fen, 4ɗ 5Ψ, P. Paquin & N. Dupérré ( CPAD).
Diagnosis.— This species is recognised by the presence of white pigments on the dorsum of the abdomen and a crescent of white pigments around posterior half (arrows, Figs 58–59 View FIGURES 53 – 63. 53 – 57 ) ( Levi 1955). Males are distinguished by the enlarged tip of the conductor (C) ( Fig. 60 View FIGURES 53 – 63. 53 – 57 ). Females are recognised by the weakly sclerotized epigynum ( Fig. 61 View FIGURES 53 – 63. 53 – 57 ), the oval spermathecae (S) ( Figs 61–63 View FIGURES 53 – 63. 53 – 57 ) and the anterior position of the copulatory openings (CO) ( Fig. 61 View FIGURES 53 – 63. 53 – 57 ).
Distribution.— Québec (present record) south to Florida, Lousiana and Mississippi.
Remark.— According to Levi (1955), the northernmost record of the species is from Durham, North Carolina. The present records are the first for Canada and extend the distribution of the species about 1000 km to the North. Its occurrence in Québec may be explained by its association with a fen, a habitat more common in southern areas.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |