Neocolochelyna (Neocolochelyna) montana ( Konow, 1898 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4127.3.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:03EB28E9-8837-4E86-AF5A-37B3FC7F9B81 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6074256 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03811A52-B213-E524-FF19-662EFAD8FDEE |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Neocolochelyna (Neocolochelyna) montana ( Konow, 1898 ) |
status |
|
Neocolochelyna (Neocolochelyna) montana ( Konow, 1898)
( Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 a, 3a–c, 6a, 7a, 7j, 8c, 8g, 8j, 9c, 9g, 11a, 11j)
Colochelyna montana Konow, 1898: 281 ; Konow, 1905: 118; Malaise, 1937: 47.
Neocolochelyna montana: Malaise, 1937: 47 ; Malaise, 1945: 114; Saini et al., 2006: 589; Saini, 2007: 54.
Description. Female. Holotype ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 a). Length 16 mm. Head brown with a large black macula covering narrow posterior margin of clypeus, supraclypeal area, inner orbit, frons, ocellar area, anterior of temple and anterior 0.6 of postocellar furrow; labrum yellow brown ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 a), lower part of posterior side of head blackish; antenna entirely brown, basal part hardly paler than apex ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 a). Thorax black, narrow lateral margin and very broad posterior margin of pronotum brown; mesoscutellum (not including mesoscutellar appendage), a short stripe on posterior margin of mesoscutal lateral lobe, anterior and posterior margins of parapsis, metascutellum, cenchri, postspiracular sclerite, prepectus (not epicnemium) and dorsal margin of metapleuron yellow brown. Abdomen black, narrow posterior margin of tergite 1 ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 a), about apical half of tergites 2–10 and apical 0.25 of each sternite dark reddish brown to yellow brown, cerci and ovipositor sheath pale brown. Body hairs brown to pale brown. Legs orange, ventral side of each coxa and first trochanter of each leg black, outer side of hind femur dark brown, all tarsi largely yellow brown. Wings yellowish infuscate in anterior part and gradually paler toward posterior margin and apex, vein C and pterostigma pale brown, posterior of vein Sc+R and most of vein M+Cu blackish; hind wing weakly infuscate, clearly paler than forewing.
Punctures on labrum large and shallow, surface smooth, shiny; punctures on clypeus dense and large, narrow interspaces between punctures hardly microsculptured, shiny; frons and inner orbit coarsely and irregularly punctured, narrow interspaces microsculptured, mat; punctures on temple and postocellar area sparser than inner orbit, interspaces smaller than punctures, surface clearly but weakly microsculptured, less shiny; malar space densely punctured ( Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 a–c); hind orbit densely punctured, interspaces linear, microsculptured, hardly shiny; upper corner of pronotum densely punctured and almost dim, depressed part of pronotum coarsely punctured and microsculptured, almost mat, narrow lateral margin of pronotum shiny; mesoscutal middle lobe and lateral lobe densely punctured, interspaces very narrow, distinctly microsculptured, punctures on posterior part of lateral lobe much denser, almost dim; punctures on mesoscutellum large and dense, interspaces narrow but flat, weakly microsculptured, less shiny; mesoscutellar appendage distinctly coriaceous in lateral side and smooth in middle part, impunctate; parapsis and metapostnotum strongly microsculptured ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 a); punctures on upper half of mesepisternum large and very dense, interspaces very narrow, hardly shiny; punctures on lower half of mesepisternum small and much sparse, surface strongly microsculptured, almost dim; mesepimeron and metapleuron strongly microsculptured mixed with large and dense punctures, narrow anterior and posterior margins of mesepimeron and of metapleuron shiny; abdominal tergite 1 strongly microsculptured, almost mat, lateral side with some shallow and large punctures ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 a); tergites 2–8 strongly microsculptured, mat, posterior margin of tergites 4–8 with some shallow and indistinct punctures; median part of tergite 10 weakly microsculptured, distinctly shiny; surface of basal sheath microsculptured mixed with some shallow punctures, apical sheath hardly coriaceous, ventral margin with a few shallow punctures, shiny.
Hairs on dorsum of head and mesopleuron dense, hardly curved at apex, about 0.9–1 times diameter of median ocellus ( Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 a–b); hairs on mesoscutal middle and lateral lobes about 0.8 times as long as diameter of median ocellus; dorsum of abdominal tergites 1, 4–8 distinctly pubescent, hairs on tergite 1 not longer and denser than other tergites, tergites 2–3 largely, mesoscutellar appendage and intertergites of abdomen entirely glabrous ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 a).
Labrum subtriangular, apical corner distinctly angled but not very acute; clypeus flat, without middle ridge, anterior margin almost truncate, very shallowly and broadly incised; malar space as long as diameter of median ocellus; distance between eyes at level of anterior tentorial pits 1.2 times as long as longest axis of eye ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 b); left mandible as Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 j; hind orbit with a distinct occipital carina in lower half; middle fovea roundish, deep, not open to frons; lateral fovea minute, with an indistinct tubercle; frons subquadrate, frontal ridge indistinct; POL: OOL: OCL=15: 30: 24; interocellar furrow short, broad and deep, postocellar furrow narrow and indistinct, clearly bent forward at middle; postocellar area flat, clearly below temple, 1.7 times as broad as long, posterior margin not elevated; lateral furrows very shallow and indistinct in anterior 0.7, replaced by a low carina in posterior 0.3, straight, distinctly divergent backwards; head roundly dilated behind eyes in dorsal view ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 a). Antenna as long as thorax, antennomere 3 about 1.1 times as long as antennomeres 4 and 5 together and 0.9 times as long as antennomeres 6–9 together, antennomere 7 about 1.2 times as long as broad ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 a). Mesoscutal middle lobe with narrow but distinct middle furrow; mesoscutellum weakly and roundly elevated, anterior margin subtriangularly protruding, transverse anterior furrow shallow; mesoscutellar appendage short with middle length about 1.1 times as long as diameter of median ocellus; mesoscutellum 6 times as long as mesoscutellar appendage; cenchrus transverse, slightly broader than long, CD=1.5 ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 a); mesepisternum roundly and weakly elevated at middle, without distinct ridge. Venation as Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 a, cell 2Rs about 0.8 times as long as cells 1R1+1Rs, cell A of forewing weakly constricted at basal 0.25, where distance between 1A and 2A+3A about 5 times as broad as vein 2A+3A; vein 1M as long as vein 1m-cu, vein 2r1 meeting cell 2Rs at apical 0.35. Inner tibial spur of fore leg as Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 j, apical incision narrow, very deep; claw as Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 a, inner tooth clearly longer than apical tooth. Triangular middle lobe of sternite 7 small, much narrower than lateral straight posterior margin of sternite 7 ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 j). Ovipositor sheath 0.9 times as long as front tibia and 0.7 times as long as middle tibia, apical sheath 1.1 times as long as basal sheath, narrowly truncate at apex in lateral view. Lancet as Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 c, with 26 serrulae, middle and apical segments as Figs 9 View FIGURE 9 c, 9g, annular spines and surface sculptures of lancet as Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 g; basal sensilla as Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 g.
Male. Body length 14 mm; color, punctation and structure similar to female except for following: head black, labrum and narrow posterior margin of temple brown; each femur largely dark brown; malar space 0.8 times as long as diameter of median ocellus; distance between eyes at level of anterior tentorial pits about 1.1 times as long as longest axis of eye; subgenital 1.1 times as long as broad, apical margin obtusely truncate; harpes about 2 times as long as broad; penis valve not dissected but similar to Fig. 10a in outline, dorsal apical hook long and strongly tapering toward apex.
Distribution. India (Sikkim) ( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 ).
Material examined. Type. Holotype: ♀, “Sikkim”; “Coll. Konow”; “ Colochelyna montana Knw. , Sikkim.”; “ Holotypus ”[red]; “ Typus ”[red]; “GBIF-GISHym 4192”. ( SDEI).
Other specimens. 1♀, MUSEUM PARIS, DARJILING, (MONTAGNES), HARMAND 1888; 3363, 86; Neocolochelyna montana Konow, Malaise det., 1935; Coll. Malaise; montana . ( SNHM). 1Ƌ, “SIKKIM, Runjit Valley, 4-94, BINGHAM COLL ”; “ COLL. C. T. Bingham, 96-30”; “British Museum”; “ Colochelyna montana Knw, Malaise det.” ( BMNH).
Host plant. Unknown.
Remarks. N. montana is similar to N. acutilabria sp. nov.. See the above key for the differences between the two species.
The holotype has a large hole on right side of mesonotum. Besides, the left prepectus (not epicnemium) in front of the postspiracular sclerite is much larger than the lateral ocellus. It should be abnormal because the prepectus on the right side is unrecognizable, and in N. acutilabria the prepectus is also very small and linear.
SNHM |
Sudan Natural History Museum |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Neocolochelyna (Neocolochelyna) montana ( Konow, 1898 )
Niu, Gengyun, Wei, Meicai, Shinohara, Akihiko & Naito, Tikahiko 2016 |
Neocolochelyna montana:
Saini 2007: 54 |
Saini 2006: 589 |
Malaise 1945: 114 |
Malaise 1937: 47 |
Colochelyna montana
Malaise 1937: 47 |
Konow 1898: 281 |