Scinax uruguayus (Schmidt, 1944) FAIVOVICH & HADDAD & GARCIA & FROST & CAMPBELL & WHEELER, 2005

FAIVOVICH, JULIÁN, HADDAD, CÉLIO F. B., GARCIA, PAULO C. A., FROST, DARREL R., CAMPBELL, JONATHAN A. & WHEELER, WARD C., 2005, Systematic Review Of The Frog Family Hylidae, With Special Reference To Hylinae: Phylogenetic Analysis And Taxonomic Revision, Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2005 (294), pp. 1-240 : 96-97

Scinax uruguayus Group

DIAGNOSIS: Putative morphological synapomorphies of this group include the bicol­ ored iris and the presence of two keratinized and pigmented plates on the sides of the low­ er jaw sheath (Kolenc et al., ‘‘2003’’ [2004]).

COMMENTS: The marginal papillae of the posterior margin of the oral disc being larger than those of the lateral margins (Kolenc et al., ‘‘2003’’ [2004]) and the reduction in toe webbing could be other synapomorphies of the group.

CONTENTS: Two species. Scinax pinima (Bokermann and Sazima, 1973) new comb.; Scinax uruguayus (Schmidt, 1944) new comb.

Species of the Scinax ruber Clade Unassigned to a Species Group

We follow Faivovich (2002) in not recognizing the former Scinax ruber and S. staufferi groups, as both were not monophyletic on his analysis. We are considering all species formerly included in these groups as members of the S. ruber clade, although we consider them as unassigned to any group. These species are Scinax acuminatus (Cope, 1862) ; Scinax altae (Dunn, 1933) ; Scinax alter (B. Lutz, 1973) ; Scinax auratus (Wied­ Neuwied, 1821); Scinax baumgardneri (Rivero, 1961) ; Scinax blairi (Fouquette and Pyburn, 1972) ; Scinax boesemani (Goin, 1966) ; Scinax caldarum (B. Lutz, 1968) ; Scinax cardosoi (Carvalho e Silva and Peixoto, 1991) ; Scinax castroviejoi De la Riva, 1993 ; Scinax chiquitanus (De la Riva, 1990) ; Scinax crospedospilus (A. Lutz, 1925) ; Scinax cruentommus (Duellman, 1972) ; Scinax curicica Pugliese, Pombal, and Sazima, 2004 ; Scinax cuspidatus (A. Lutz, 1925) ; Scinax danae (Duellman, 1986) ; Scinax dolloi (Werner, 1898) new comb.; Scinax duartei (B. Lutz, 1951) ; Scinax elaeochrous (Cope, 1875) ; Scinax eurydice (Bokermann, 1964) ; Scinax exiguus (Duellman, 1986) ; Scinax flavidus La Marca, 2004 ; Scinax funereus (Cope, 1874) ; Scinax fuscomarginatus (A. Lutz, 1925) ; Scinax fuscovarius (A. Lutz, 1925) ; Scinax granulatus (Peters, 1871) ; Scinax hayii (Barbour, 1909) ; Scinax ictericus Duellman and Wiens, 1993 ; Scinax karenanneae (Pyburn, 1992) comb. nov.; Scinax lindsayi Pyburn, 1992 ; Scinax manriquei Barrio­Amorós , Orellana, and Chacon, 2004; Scinax maracaya (Cardoso and Sazima, 1980) ; Scinax nasicus (Cope, 1862) ; Scinax oreites Duellman and Wiens, 1993 ; Scinax pachycrus (Miranda­Ribeiro, 1937) ; Scinax parkeri (Gaige, 1926) ; Scinax perereca Pombal, Haddad, and Kasahara, 1995 ; Scinax quinquefasciatus (Fowler, 1913) ; Scinax rub­ er (Laurenti, 1768); Scinax similis (Cochran, 1952) ; Scinax squalirostris (A. Lutz, 1925) ; Scinax staufferi (Cope, 1865) ; Scinax trilineatus (Hoogmoed and Gorzula, 1977) ; Scinax wandae (Pyburn and Fouquette, 1971) ; Scinax x­signatus (Spix, 1824) .