Mycale (Carmia) raphidiophora Hentschel, 1911
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4912.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9536C1CF-4AEF-47F8-959B-48CD7A5392D8 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4450946 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/361087A7-FF80-FFE5-55AB-FEEF5382CABA |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Mycale (Carmia) raphidiophora Hentschel, 1911 |
status |
|
Mycale (Carmia) raphidiophora Hentschel, 1911 View in CoL
Figs 46 View FIGURE 46 a–i
Mycale raphidiophora Hentschel, 1911: 291 View in CoL .
Mycale (Carmia) raphidiophora View in CoL ; Shaw 1927: 424 (no description).
Material examined. ZMA Por. 11176, Seychelles, Mahé, of SE coast, 4.7667°S 55.55°E, depth 45–50 m, rectangular dredge, coll GoogleMaps . R. W.M. van Soest, Netherlands Indian Ocean Expedition stat. 742, field nr. IOP-E 742/04, 24 December 1992 (red) ; ZMA Por. 12704, Seychelles, Mahé, off SE coast, 4.7667°S 55.55°E, depth 45–50 m, rectangular dredge, coll GoogleMaps . R. W.M. van Soest, Netherlands Indian Ocean Expedition stat. 742, field nr. IOP-E 742/03, 24 December 1992 (red) .
Description ( Fig. 46a View FIGURE 46 ). Encrusting shells, up 6 x 4 cm in lateral expansion, several mm thick. Red colored in life, in preservation grayish beige. Surface irregular, slightly punctate, no visible openings. Consistency soft, easily damaged.
Skeleton ( Fig. 46b,b View FIGURE 46 1 View FIGURE 1 ). The interior of the sponge is filled with refractile grains. The skeleton consists of thick spicule tracts of 55–110 µm diameter (consisting of 8–12 megascleres in cross section) coursing from the substratum to the surface, where they fan out into brushes of individual spicules. The surface membrane is charged with microscleres and these also are scattered in the tissue between the refractile grains. Rosettes of anisochelae I, 80–125 µm in diameter, are rare but do occur in both specimens.
Spicules ( Figs 46 View FIGURE 46 c–i). Mycalostyles, three categories of anisochelae, two categories of sigmas, raphidotoxas.
Mycalostyles ( Figs 46c,c View FIGURE 46 1 View FIGURE 1 ), short, fusiform, and comparatively robust, with prominent head and subterminal neck, 254– 277.6 –298 x 4– 6.4 – 8 µm.
Anisochelae ( Fig. 46d View FIGURE 46 ) I, robust with well developed upper and lower alae, free part of the shaft 30–35% of spicule length, 44– 47.8 – 52 µm.
Anisochelae II ( Fig. 46e View FIGURE 46 ), narrow-shaped, well-developed upper and lower alae, free part of shaft about 35% of spicule length, 19– 21.9 – 25 µm.
Anisochelae III ( Fig. 46f View FIGURE 46 ), reduced, with poorly developed upper and lower lateral alae, 10– 14.2 – 18 µm.
Sigmas I ( Fig. 46g View FIGURE 46 ), robust, narrow-shaped, asymmetrical, 71– 85.1 –105 x 4.5– 6.1 – 7 µm.
Sigmas II ( Fig. 46h View FIGURE 46 ), thin (1 µm or less in thickness), almost symmetrical, 17– 18.3 – 21 µm, quite rare in ZMA Por. 11176.
Raphidotoxas ( Figs 46i,i View FIGURE 46 1 View FIGURE 1 ), usually arranged in loose bundles, curved shape, about 1 µm thick in the middle, 250– 338.5 – 462 µm.
Distribution and ecology. Seychelles, West Australia, possibly Tasmania, on shells, collected at greater depth (down to 50 m).
Remarks. The description of Hentschel of the holotype from West Australia differs in several aspects, anisochelae I are only up to 28 µm (against up to 50 µm in our specimens), and within the smaller anisochelae no distinction was made into anisochelae II and III, sized only 12–15 µm (against 10–24 µm in our specimens). Furthermore, no sigma II were mentioned by Hentschel, but these are easily overlooked in many specimens of Mycale , and are rare in our specimens. The occurrence on shells, the shape of the mycalostyles, the presence of raphidotoxas and robust sigma I are similarities between the holotype and our specimens. We prefer to emphasize these similarities.
There is considerable resemblance to Mycale (Carmia) rhaphidotoxa Hentschel, 1912 , which will be treated below. The difference between the two species as defined here is the more delicate skeletal tracts and the apparent absence of sigmas II in M. (C.) rhaphidotoxa .
There are several other species in the region possessing raphidotoxas, see below, M. (C.) raphidotoxa Hentschel, 1912 , M. (C.) tenuichela sp.nov., and M. (C.) tydemani sp.nov. The present material stands out by having relatively robust skeleton and spicules, and detailed small differences (cf. key below).
ZMA |
Universiteit van Amsterdam, Zoologisch Museum |
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Mycale |
Mycale (Carmia) raphidiophora Hentschel, 1911
Van, Rob W. M., Aryasari, Ratih & De, Nicole J. 2021 |
Mycale (Carmia) raphidiophora
Shaw, M. E. 1927: 424 |
Mycale raphidiophora
Hentschel, E. 1911: 291 |