Vellumnus intonsus, Ng & Prema & Ravichandran, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5476.1.26 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:84C66278-7194-4F3E-8145-3918E1659289 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12746150 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C54B01-FF84-3757-FFF1-FF1D95D9FED9 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Vellumnus intonsus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Vellumnus intonsus n. sp.
( Figs. 8–10 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 View FIGURE 10 )
Pilumnus labyrinthicus View in CoL .— Henderson, 1893: 365 (Gulf of Manaar); Kathirvel & Gokul, 2010: 27. (Not Pilumnus labyrinthicus Miers 1884 View in CoL ).
Vellumnus labyrinthicus View in CoL .— Trivedi et al. 2018: 61 (list).
Type material. Holotype: male (cw 4.3 mm, cl 3.0 mm), CASAU-CR-2021-1024, in coral rubble, Mankudy fish landing centre, Kanyakumari district, Tamil Nadu, southern India, Southeastern Arabian Sea, 8°05′29.8′′N, 77°29′02.9′′E, 50–60 m, coll. M. Prema, 5 November 2021 GoogleMaps . Paratype: 1 ovigerous female (cw 4.3 mm, cl 3.1 mm), ZRC 2022.0999 View Materials , same data as holotype GoogleMaps .
Etymology. The name is derived from the Latin for bearded and unshaven; alluding to the appearance of the species.
Diagnosis. Carapace hexagonal, wide; surface and pereiopods covered with dense, short, soft pubescence as well as scattered long plumose setae completely obscuring margins and surfaces, longer setae arranged in clumps on carapace regions, forming faint circular patterns on gastric and cardiac regions ( Fig. 8A, B View FIGURE 8 ); epigastric, mesogastric, postorbital cristae low, gastric and subhepatic regions with scattered low granules, hepatic region with low broad tubercle, may be very low ( Figs. 8C, D View FIGURE 8 , 10A, B View FIGURE 10 ); frontal margin distinctly convex, lateral lobule sharp, distinct, separated from frontal lobes by deep V-shaped cleft; supraorbital margin with median fissure, margin convex ( Figs. 8C, D View FIGURE 8 , 10A, B View FIGURE 10 ); external orbital tooth triangular, first anterolateral tooth triangular, third tooth smallest; subhepatic tooth low or distinct, may be visible in dorsal view ( Figs. 8C, D View FIGURE 8 , 10A, B View FIGURE 10 ); surface of merus of third maxilliped smooth, anteroexternal angle of rounded, not auriculiform, ischium relatively short ( Fig. 10C View FIGURE 10 ); outer surface of chelae with numerous relatively large round granules, vaguely arranged in longitudinal rows, carpus with numerous round granules, without distinct tooth on inner angle, fingers shorter than palm ( Fig. 9B–E View FIGURE 9 ); ambulatory legs without distinct crests or ridges, unarmed; surfaces completely obscured by numerous long, short setae ( Fig. 9F View FIGURE 9 ); anterior thoracic sternum with surfaces relatively smooth, suture between sternites 3 and 4 shallow, medially interrupted ( Fig. 9A View FIGURE 9 ); male pleon relatively narrow, subrectangular, pleonal somites 1, 3 subequal in width; telson semicircular ( Figs. 9A View FIGURE 9 , 10F View FIGURE 10 ); G1 slender, sinuous along entire length, distal part gently bent laterally with sharp tip ( Fig. 10G, H View FIGURE 10 ).
Variation. In the holotype male, there is a distinct large but low tubercle behind the first anterolateral tooth and the subhepatic region has a distinct tooth which is clearly visible in dorsal view ( Figs. 8D View FIGURE 8 , 10A View FIGURE 10 ). In the paratype female, however, the surface behind the first anterolateral tooth is only slightly raised and barely visible and the subhepatic tooth is low and poorly developed, and hardly visible in dorsal view ( Figs. 8C View FIGURE 8 , 10B View FIGURE 10 ). The two specimens, however, agree in all other aspects and we are confident they are conspecific.
Colouration. Not known.
Remarks. Henderson (1893: 365–366) recorded one small specimen cw 5.0 by cl 4.0 mm in size (no sex indicated) as “ Pilumnus labyrinthicus ” from Rameswaram, southern India, noting that it has “the very characteristic markings or lines on its dorsal surface, which hear some resemblance to a face.” Kathirvel & Gokul (2010) subsequently listed the species based on this record from the Gulf of Mannar. On the basis of this description and distribution, this record is likely to be conspecific with V. intonsus n. sp. The records of “ Pilumnus labyrinthicus ” from the Andaman and Nicobar Islands by Dev Roy & Nandi (2012) and Dev Roy (2015) need to be clarified and their specimens examined to confirm if they are V. labyrinthicus s. str. or V. intonsus n. sp.
The small adult size (cw less than 8 mm), less obvious setal pattern on the carapace, the absence of ridges under the vermiform setal patterns, and relatively wider male thoracic sternum and male pleon allies V. intonsus n. sp. most closely with V. penicillatus (type locality Hong Kong). Vellumnus intonsus n. sp. can be separated from by the lateral lobule of the front being separated from the frontal lobes by a deep cleft ( Fig. 10A, B View FIGURE 10 ) (vs. separated by a shallow concavity in V. penicillatus ; Ng & Clark 2023: fig. 3A–C); the external orbital tooth is triangular in shape ( Fig. 10A, B View FIGURE 10 ) (vs. truncatiform in V. penicillatus ; Ng & Clark 2023: fig. 3A–C); the granules on the cheliped carpus and chela are proportionately larger and fewer in number ( Fig. 9B–E View FIGURE 9 ) (vs. smaller and more numerous in V. penicillatus ; Ng & Clark 2023: figs. 1A, B, 2A, B); and the distal part of the G1 is distinctly curved downwards and hooked ( Fig. 10G, H View FIGURE 10 ) (vs. distal part is curved laterally at approximately right angles in V. penicillatus ; Ng & Clark 2023: fig. 3H, I).
Vellumnus intonsus n. sp. also resembles V. pygmaeus (type locality Ogasawara Islands) and V. pictus (known only from one female from the Persian Gulf) and most of the differences between them are shared with V. penicillatus . Vellumnus pygmaeus can be separated as it has the supraorbital margin prominently more convex ( Takeda, 1977: fig. 5A) (vs. supraorbital margin gently convex with median fissure in V. intonsus n. sp.; Fig. 8C, D View FIGURE 8 , 10A, B View FIGURE 10 ); and the G1 is relatively stouter with the distal part curved laterally ( Takeda, 1977: fig. 5B, C) (vs. G1 slender, sinuous with the distal part gently bent laterally, with a sharp tip in V. intonsus n. sp.; Fig. 10G, H View FIGURE 10 ). Compared with V. pictus , V. intonsus n. sp. also has the merus of the third maxilliped smooth with the anterolateral angle gently rounded ( Fig. 10C View FIGURE 10 ) (vs. surface with granules and the anterolateral angle is auriculiform in V. pictus ; Fahimi & Naderloo, 2023: fig. 1D); and there are relatively more numerous granules on the outer surface of the chela ( Fig. 9B–E View FIGURE 9 ) (vs. fewer and less evenly distributed in V. pictus ; Fahimi & Naderloo, 2023: fig. 1C).
Vellumnus intonsus n. sp. also differs from the type species, V. labyrinthicus , in the vermiform setal pattern being only evident on the gastric and cardiac regions and when denuded, the underlying surface is smooth ( Fig. 8A–D View FIGURE 8 ) (vermiform pattern more pronounced in V. labyrinthicus with the setae is present on most of the carapace regions, and there is an ridge under these setae when denuded; Ng 2010: figs. 13A, 14A, 15A); the anterolateral teeth are relatively shorter with the last tooth directed obliquely anteriorly ( Fig. 8C, D View FIGURE 8 ) (anterolateral teeth stronger and longer with the last tooth directed laterally in V. labyrinthicus ; Ng 2010: fig. 14A); the male anterior thoracic sternum is proportionately wider ( Fig. 9A View FIGURE 9 ) (proportionately narrower in V. labyrinthicus ; Ng 2010: fig. 14B); the male pleon is relatively wider, especially across somites 3 and 4 ( Fig. 10F View FIGURE 10 ) (entire pleon distinctly narrower in V. labyrinthicus ; Ng 2010: fig. 16D); and the G1 is more distinctly sinuous with the proximal half strongly curved ( Fig. 10G, H View FIGURE 10 ) (the proximal half is only gently curved with the G1 relatively less sinuous in V. labyrinthicus ; Ng 2010: figs. 15C, 16E, F).
Vellumnus intonsus n. sp. can be separated from V. minabensis and V. tki by its proportionately wider male anterior thoracic sternum ( Fig. 9A View FIGURE 9 ) (vs. anterior thoracic sternum proportionately narrower in V. minabensis and V. tki , e.g., Ng & Clark 2023: fig. 6E); the median lobe of the posterior margin of the epistome is distinctly triangular in shape ( Fig. 10D View FIGURE 10 ) (vs. median lobe is lower and more lobiform in V. minabensis and V. tki , e.g., Ng & Clark 2023: fig. 6B); the ischium of the third maxilliped is relatively shorter ( Fig. 10C View FIGURE 10 ) (vs. ischium distinctly longer in V. minabensis and V. tki , e.g., Ng & Clark 2023: fig. 6C); there are fewer but larger granules on the outer surface of the cheliped ( Fig. 9B–E View FIGURE 9 ) (vs. more numerous smaller granules in V. minabensis and V. tki , e.g., Ng & Clark 2023: fig. 5B, C); and the distal part of the G1 is distinctly more elongate ( Fig. 10G, H View FIGURE 10 ) (vs. G1 distal part shorter in V. minabensis and V. tki , e.g., Ng & Clark 2023: fig. 6H, I).
Distribution. Only known from the type locality.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
InfraOrder |
Brachyura |
SuperFamily |
Pilumnoidea |
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Pilumninae |
Genus |
Vellumnus intonsus
Ng, Peter K. L., Prema, Mani & Ravichandran, Samuthirapandian 2024 |
Vellumnus labyrinthicus
Trivedi, J. N. & Trivedi, D. J. & Vachhrajani, K. D. & Ng, P. K. L. 2018: 61 |
Pilumnus labyrinthicus
Kathirvel, M. & Gokul, A. 2010: 27 |
Henderson, J. R. 1893: 365 |