Turritella lucagrita, Gründel & Nützel, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/zitteliana.98.e138605 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9FB6F185-9EA1-48EB-A5C9-632BD52A8B6F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14392451 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/981B3127-5498-5628-9CC7-FE72940013AA |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Turritella lucagrita |
status |
sp. nov. |
Turritella lucagrita sp. nov.
Plate 9: figs 15–17 View Plate 9
Etymology.
Arbitrary.
Holotype.
SNSB-BSPG 2016 XXI 1840 , the only specimens at hand.
Type locality and stratum.
Upper Jurassic (Kimmeridgian) reefal limestones from the locality Saal near Kelheim, Lower Bavaria ( Gründel et al. 2015, 2022).
Diagnosis.
Shell high-spired, very slender; whorls face of early whorls barely converge, later whorls converge significantly towards the apex; early whorls with 3 spiral cords of approximately equal strength; on late whorls, abapical spiral cord (low on whorls) strengthened, prominently protruding, angulating whorl face.
Description.
Shell high-spired, very slender; shell 75 mm high; shell flanks straight; sutures distinct; sculpture consists of 3 spiral cords; upper and lower spiral cord at clear distance from adapical and abapical suture respectively; on early whorls, all three spiral cords almost equally strong (middle one slightly weaker than others); whorl face of early whorls barely converge, later whorls converge significantly towards apex; no nodes visible on whorl face; on late whorls abapical spiral cord becomes stronger than others and protrudes noticeably forming an angulation low on whorl; shell ornament reduced on last preserved whorls; base and aperture not preserved; no plaits visible; narrow umbilicus present.
Remarks.
Turritella amitava Das et al., 2018 from India (originally thought to be of Jurassic age but later found to be Miocene: Fürsich et al. 2023, and again as identified as being Upper Jurassic by Das et al. 2024) is smaller, secondary spiral cords are formed next to the 3 main spiral cords, and shows no ontogenetic reduction of the sculpture. Turritella dhosaensis Das et al., 2018 (also of disputed age, Jurassic vs Miocene) is smaller, the abapical and middle spiral cord is are closer to each other than the middle and adapical spiral cord; the abapical spiral cord does not protrude as much on late whorls, and the ontogenetic sculptural change is generally missing. Promathilda (Teretrina) sp. sensu Hägele (1997) is much smaller, has more numerous and weaker but equally strong spiral cords, there is no ontogenetic sculptural reduction. Aptyxiella tricincta (Münster) sensu Quenstedt (1881–1884 ) has a concave or almost straight and vertical whorl face, the subsutural spiral cord is the strongest and the abapical one is not reinforced and does not protrude.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
SuperFamily |
Cerithioidea |
Family |
|
Genus |