Tupigea guapia Huber, 2011
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2010.524319 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A887D8-FF97-FFA9-BB17-DEA9FE58FE2E |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Tupigea guapia Huber |
status |
sp. nov. |
Tupigea guapia Huber View in CoL , sp. nov.
( Figures 8E View Figure 8 , 9 View Figure 9 F–M)
Types
Male holotype and 2♂, 3♀ paratypes from Brazil, Rio de Janeiro: Cachoeiras de Macacú, Reserva Ecológica Guapiaçú (22 ◦ 24.4 ′ to 25.3 ′ S, 42 ◦ 44.2 ′ to 44.3 ′ W), 140– 280 m a.s.l., 25 September 2009 (B.A. Huber), in MNRJ (holotype, 1♀ paratype), and ZFMK (2♂, 2♀ paratypes) .
Etymology
The specific name is a noun in apposition, taken from the type locality.
Diagnosis
Very similar to T. ale , distinguished by male chelicerae (slightly stronger hairs on proximal elevation, no modified hair-bases; Figure 9F View Figure 9 ) and epigynum (large triangular scape, Figures 8E View Figure 8 , 9K View Figure 9 ). From other known congeners also by male palp (femur without ventral modification, procursus shape, bulb shape).
Male (holotype)
Total body length 1.8, carapace width 0.6. Leg 1: 20.3 (5.1 + 0.3 + 4.9 + 8.5 + 1.5), tibia 2: 3.1, tibia 3: 2.2, tibia 4: 2.9, tibia 1 L / d: 79. Habitus as in T. ale (cf. Figure 4O,P View Figure 4 ); prosoma and legs pale ochre-yellow, abdomen pale greenish-gray. Distance PME–PME 170 µm, diameter PME 60 µm, distance PME–ALE 35 µm, no trace of AME. Ocular area barely elevated, each triad on low hump, thoracic furrow shallow but distinct, clypeus unmodified. Chelicerae as in Figure 9F View Figure 9 , with slightly stronger hairs on proximal elevation but without modified hair-bases. Sternum wider than long (0.46 / 0.40), unmodified. Palps mostly as in T. ale (cf. Figure 8A,B View Figure 8 ), only bulbal apophysis slightly stronger and straighter; tarsal organ exposed. Legs without spines and curved hairs, with vertical hairs on femora and tibiae; retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at 9%; tarsus 1 with> 20 pseudosegments, poorly visible. Anterior lateral spinnerets with two spigots each ( Figure 9I View Figure 9 ).
Variation. Tibia 1 in seven other males: 4.4–5.4 (mean: 4.9).
Female
In general similar to male; tips of palps darkened, no vertical hairs on legs. Tibia 1 in nine females: 3.3–3.9 (mean: 3.5). Epigynum with large triangular scape directed backwards ( Figures 8E View Figure 8 , 9K View Figure 9 ); internal genitalia as in Figures 8E View Figure 8 and 9L View Figure 9 .
Distribution
Known from type locality only ( Figure 2 View Figure 2 ).
Material examined
BRAZIL: Rio de Janeiro: Cachoeiras de Macacú , Reserva Ecológica Guapiaçú: 3♂, 3♀ types above; same data but 23 September 2009 (B.A. Huber, A. Giupponi), 1♂, 1♀ in ZFMK; same data but 23–24 September 2009 (B.A. Huber), 1♀, 1 juvenile in pure ethanol, in ZFMK; forest fragment near Res. Ecol. Guapiaçú (∼22 ◦ 27.9 ′ S, 42 ◦ 45.8 ′ W), ∼ 150 m a.s.l., 24 September 2009 (A. Giupponi), 5♂, 7♀ in MNRJ (3♂, 5♀) and ZFMK (2♂, 2♀) .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.