Capsaloides sinuatus ( Goto, 1894 ) Price, 1938
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.172308 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C21EA9A2-6A92-452C-849D-DC11B657E4C4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6255203 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FC8787-E17B-FFD4-FED3-FEEA9C7DF9F6 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Capsaloides sinuatus ( Goto, 1894 ) Price, 1938 |
status |
|
Capsaloides sinuatus ( Goto, 1894) Price, 1938 View in CoL ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 G)
Synonyms: Tristomum sinuatum Goto, 1894 ; Capsala sinuata ( Goto, 1894) Johnston, 1929 ; Capsaloides sinuatum ( Goto, 1894) Price, 1938 .
Typehost: Histiophorus sp. ( Istiophoridae ). Goto (1894) lists the Japanese name “kajiki” as the host of C. sinuatus . Lawler (1981) noted that with this Japanese name, the host is likely now known as Istiophorus platypterus .
Typelocality: Misaki, Japan [Pacific Ocean].
Site: Inner side of gills.
Additional record: Gills of Tetrapterus audax (Philippi, 1887) , Hawaii, USA [Pacific Ocean] (see Yamaguti 1968).
Specimens examined: Two voucher specimens (CNHE 002739).
Remarks
We were unable to locate typematerial to verify the original description or the 5 specimens upon which the redescription was based (see Yamaguti 1968). The haptoral accessory sclerite ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 G; redrawn from Goto 1894) does not appear to be completely in profile in a flattened dorsoventral orientation. Goto (1894) described the uterus as opening into the “genital atrium” near the common genital pore but Yamaguti (1968) depicted the uterus as having a separate aperture. Goto (1894) based his description on careful observations of whole and sectioned material. Furthermore, in all other species of Capsaloides , the uterus joins the male copulatory organ canal just before the common genital pore. Therefore, it is likely that Yamaguti’s depiction of a separate uterine aperture is incorrect.
We examined 2 voucher specimens identified by LamotheArgumedo as C. sinuatus . These worms were collected from the gills of T. audax caught off Mazatlan, Mexico. We cannot distinguish these apparent C. sinuatus specimens from the holotype of C. cristatus . The dorsomarginal body sclerites of the 2 voucher specimens are identical to C. cristatus . Of particular note is the presence of the left anterior isolated group of dorsomarginal body sclerites (6–7 isolated sclerites with 6–10 cusps) in the 2 voucher specimens which was not described for C. sinuatus by Goto (1894). If these voucher specimens are indeed C. sinuatus , this provides further support for the synonymy of C. cristatus with C. sinuatus . However, until typematerial is located or additional specimens from the typelocality are collected, we choose not to make this decision.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |