Triphoris scitula A. Adams, 1854
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5088.1.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:904D8C6D-A0C0-4D5A-960F-AEBACE141DF0 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14206769 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0380CB2B-0494-15C7-FFB4-4860FD49F80D |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Triphoris scitula A. Adams, 1854 |
| status |
|
Triphoris scitula A. Adams, 1854
Triphoris scitulus A. Adams, 1854: 278 View in CoL .
Triforis scitulus A. Adams, 1854 — Tryon 1887: 191.
Triphora scitula A. Adams, 1854 View in CoL — Hedley 1904: 883.
Notosinister scitula (A. Adams, 1854) — Cotton & Godfrey 1931: 54.
Hedleytriphora scitula (A. Adams, 1854) View in CoL — Marshall 1983: 38, fig. 17d–f.
Type locality. Australia, South Australia, Port Lincoln.
Type material. NHMUK 196561 About NHMUK , lectotype . NHMUK 196562/1–2 , paralectotypes .
Distribution. Australia ( Adams 1854; Tryon 1887; Paetel 1888; Hedley 1904; Cotton 1959; Marshall 1983; Albano et al. 2019).
Remarks. The genus Triphoris is of feminine gender, therefore the name should be Triphoris scitula . Lectotype designation by Marshall (1983). Marshall (1983) considered Triphoris pfeifferi Crosse & P. Fischer, 1865 a junior synonym of Triphoris scitula A. Adams, 1854 .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Triphoris scitula A. Adams, 1854
| Bakker, Piet A. J. & Albano, Paolo G. 2022 |
Hedleytriphora scitula (A. Adams, 1854 )
| Marshall, B. A. 1983: 38 |
Notosinister scitula (A. Adams, 1854 )
| Cotton, B. C. & Godfrey, F. K. 1931: 54 |
Triphora scitula A. Adams, 1854
| Hedley, C. 1904: 883 |
Triforis scitulus A. Adams, 1854
| Tryon, G. W. 1887: 191 |
Triphoris scitulus A. Adams, 1854: 278
| Adams, A. 1854: 278 |