Tetranychus gigas Pritchard & Baker
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.157781 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6272911 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E20754-FFE8-1E50-FEF9-FD77FD50FAA0 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tetranychus gigas Pritchard & Baker |
status |
|
Tetranychus gigas Pritchard & Baker
Tetranychus gigas Pritchard & Baker, 1955:405 .
Redescription
FEMALE (n = 18) — Idiosoma 368–563 long, 555–675 including rostrum, 280–431 wide. Colour in life carmine red.
Prodorsal striation longitudinal; opisthosomal striae longitudinal between setae e1 and e1 and again between setae f1 and f1, forming a diamond shaped pattern. Peritremes distally hooked. ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ).
Palp tarsus: terminal eupathidium (spinneret) 6 long and 4.5 in diameter; two lateral eupathidia 6 and 7 long; solenidion 6 long. ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 6 – 11 ).
Prodorsal setae slender, barbed; length v2 64 –79, sc1 124–158, sc2 94–113. Distances between setal insertions: v2–v2 60 –75, sc1–sc1 83–94. Hysterosomal setae long, pubescent. Setal length: c1 116–150, c2 113–143, c3 101–124, d1 113–139, d2 113–139, e1 113–131, e2 113–143, f1 98–128, f2 79–101, h1 38–49. Distances between setal insertions: c1–c1 56–79, d1–d1 98–109, e1–e1 113–131, f1–f1 34–75.
Legs: tarsus I with proximal duplex setae located at level ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 2 – 5 ) or about level ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 2 – 5 ) with the four proximal tactile setae. Empodia of tarsi I–IV with a small mediodorsal spur, visible in a perfect lateral view, less than one third the length of the proximoventral hairs. ( Figs. 8–11 View FIGURES 6 – 11 ).
Leg chaetotaxy, from coxae to tarsi (solenidia in parentheses; numbers in brackets represent an alternative setal count observed in a few specimens)
I — 21 9[10]59(1)13(1) + 2 duplexes
II — 21 7[6]57[8]13(1) + 1 duplex
III — 11 44[3]79(1)
IV — 11 4[3] 4710 (1)
Ventral idiosoma transversely striated; area immediately anterior to genitalia with longitudinal broken striae. ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 6 – 11 ).
µm MALE (n = 10) — smaller than female, 366–484 long, including rostrum. Palptarsus terminal eupathidium (spinneret) 5 long and 2.6 in diameter; two lateral eupathidia 5 and 6 long; solenidion 4.5 long. ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 12 – 19 ).
Leg chaetotaxy, from coxae to tarsi (solenidia in parentheses)
I — 211059 (4)13(2) + 2 duplexes
II — 21 65713(1) + 1 duplex
III — 11 4469(1)
IV — 11 44710(1)
Empodium I with a strong proximoventral, tapering tooth and, on each side, with a finer tooth on each side; mediodorsal spur strong and nearly as long as the trifid appendage. Empodium II with a strongly developed mediodorsal spur; empodia III and IV each with the mediodorsal spur small but obvious. ( Figs. 14–17 View FIGURES 12 – 19 ).
Aedeagus shaft short, gradually narrowing and turning dorsad at a wide (obtuse) angle, ending in a larger knob. A neck is virtually absent. Aedeagal knob about as long as dorsal margin of shaft with the anterior angulation acute and caudal angulation acutely curved ventrad. Dorsum of knob rounded ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 12 – 19 ). Pritchard & Baker (1955) describe and figure a longer dorsal margin of the aedeagal shaft, however in the paratype specimen as well as in the Brazilian specimens we examined is much shorter.
We also examined one female and one male of a Tetranychus collected from beans, Phaseolus vulgaris L., in Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil, 5 Nov. 1971, coll. O. Nakano, which is considered to be very close to T. gigas . The male aedeagus is undistinguishable from that of T. gigas , but its tibia II has only 6 setae and tarsus IV 9 setae and one solenidion. The female is similar to that of T. gigas in the general aspect, differing in having 6 setae on tibia III and mainly in the much longer dorsal opisthosomal setae: c1 225, c2 210, c3 195, d1 225, d2 210, e1 206, e2 210, f1 180, f2 105 and in the wider distances between their bases: c1–c1 113, d1–d1 165, e1–e1 101 and f1–f1 105. Tarsal appendages have also the same aspect as those of T. gigas .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SubOrder |
Prostigmata |
Family |
|
Genus |
Tetranychus gigas Pritchard & Baker
Návia, Denise & Flechtmann, Carlos H. W. 2004 |
Tetranychus gigas Pritchard & Baker , 1955 :405
Pritchard 1955: 405 |